3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only) Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for third generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories. THIS IS FOR THE 5.9L ONLY!

Metric Versus Standard Mpg??

Old Dec 12, 2005 | 01:42 PM
  #1  
rickkari0304's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: ALGONA, WA
Metric Versus Standard Mpg??

Quick question guys. I was looking at another thread about mileage and how a metric setting would be higher. I checked mine and it shows 10.0 mpg on standard and 23.1 metric. I'm no math genius but that doesn't make any sense. It shoulod be closer to 14.5-15 on standard if metric is correct. Any thoughts or ideas on what's going on. This is an 06 auto with just over a thousand miles and the overhead has never went over 10.1, which to me sucks. My first hand calc was like 12.7 standard. Way worse than my 03 6-spd. Could my whole computer be off. Can my odometer be off from the factory? Let me know what you think. Thanks.

Rick
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 02:39 PM
  #2  
MadFrog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
about the metric thing:
american is miles per gallon: how many miles you can get out of one gallon of gas
metric is liters per 100km: how many liters of fuel you will burn over a 100km drive.

The higher the mpg, the lower the l/100km will be.

here's a *rough * conversion example:
10mpg = 16 km / gal ~ 4km/liter

4 km per 1 liter, will be about 25 liter for 100km.

10mpg ~ 25l/100km

if I had used the actual value of 3.79liter per gallon, we would have gotten the 23.1 that your overhead indicated. hth.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 04:07 PM
  #3  
rickkari0304's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: ALGONA, WA
Thanks. I thought of that on my way to the dealer to pick up my plates. I sure hope the mileage improves. I spent a lot of $$'s on this truck. I was counting on it lasting 10 years and getting 15-19 like my 03. My fingers are crossed.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #4  
Scotty's Avatar
Top's Younger Twin
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,743
Likes: 21
From: Thanks Don M!
And then theres the Imperial gallon that many Canucks post their mileage as so it looks/sounds better too. LOL
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 08:13 AM
  #5  
nickleinonen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
From: markham, ontario, canada
Originally Posted by Scotty
And then theres the Imperial gallon that many Canucks post their mileage as so it looks/sounds better too. LOL

yep..

the imperial gallon [and its dividends] are useless... my workplace uses them, mixed with american gallons [and soon to be liters]

±15.3 mpg [us gallon] = ±15.3 L/100km

i know when my overhead starts showing 15+ L/100km i have been driving too agressively to even think of getting good fuel economy

1 imperial gallon = 5 us quarts
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 02:31 PM
  #6  
abc4yew's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 1
From: Maritimes, Canada
Guys, Leave it on metric and then the harder you drive the more mileage points you get. ks
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:40 AM
  #7  
Steve034x4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: North of the Frost Line....near Priddis Alberta
Just watch the engine hour meter tick over when it's set to metric time...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
samiam4
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
5
Aug 25, 2008 04:34 PM
RenegadeT
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
3
Apr 24, 2007 09:27 PM
BigDodge1
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
3
Dec 5, 2006 04:46 PM
fredbert
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
1
May 16, 2005 09:40 PM
Parvenu
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
2
Oct 18, 2003 03:10 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM.