Best wheel and tire combo for MPG?
i missed that one but im running 20's on 35's and at 70mph im running 1900 rpms and still passing people so im prob goin a lil faster than is says i stay consist at 20 mpg on the highway and have got as lil as 18 and as good as 22 that was hand calculated to this past december comin home from colorado
Its all gonna come down to where you drive. If you are on the highway often you can go a little larger to keep rpms down. In the city you want a little smaller and easier to turn over. Either way if you can reduce weight/rotational mass it may help a bit. In the long run unless you are an over the road hauler I doubt any set up is going to help you much, and all that money you sepnd on wheels and tires would be better spent on fuel.
JMO.
JMO.
i currently have moto metal 951's and pro comp xtreme tires. The biggest that would fit without a leveling kit. I do mainly highway driving and will need new tires soon. Will go with something less aggressive and looking for ideas
DTR's 'Wrench thrower...' And he aims for the gusto...
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 3
From: Smith Valley, NV (sometimes Redwood City, CA)
Honestly think lighter, skinnier, and a touch taller than stock height. I am running 295/70/17 nitto terra grapplers on my truck and am thinking about dropping to a 285/70/17 with a more full rib design to cut the rolling resistance more. Hope this helps.
Trending Topics
For best mpg the lightest, narrowest wheel/tire combo would be best. Your trucks gearing would determine the tire diameter.
The tire would have to have a highway type rib tread.
For most trucks going to a taller tire would help.
Just a quick search for the stock 17inch wheels:
LT235/80R17E's are readily available, much narrower but nearly the same diameter as the stock 265/70R17's.
Nitto Dura-Grapplers in LT285/75R17E. Nearly 2 inches taller than the stock 265/70R17's. Only about a inch wider.
http://www.nittotire.com/#index%2Eti...appler%2Esizes
LT225/70R19.5G's highway ribs on 19.5 inch aluminum wheels would be interesting. The 19.5inch G tires are very
heavy but very narrow. Plus they are expensive.
The tire would have to have a highway type rib tread.
For most trucks going to a taller tire would help.
Just a quick search for the stock 17inch wheels:
LT235/80R17E's are readily available, much narrower but nearly the same diameter as the stock 265/70R17's.
Nitto Dura-Grapplers in LT285/75R17E. Nearly 2 inches taller than the stock 265/70R17's. Only about a inch wider.
http://www.nittotire.com/#index%2Eti...appler%2Esizes
LT225/70R19.5G's highway ribs on 19.5 inch aluminum wheels would be interesting. The 19.5inch G tires are very
heavy but very narrow. Plus they are expensive.
DTR's 'Wrench thrower...' And he aims for the gusto...
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 3
From: Smith Valley, NV (sometimes Redwood City, CA)
The 235/80 would be an excellent mileage tire overall. It might be too narrow to carry the weight well in corners though. Taller is not always your friend with mileage because taller is heavier. Just raising the effective gear ratio with a taller tire is not necesarily going to help at all, it depends on the speeds you are driving and your current ratio. Don't fall into the trap of bigger is always better.
For instance, a taller, heavier, wider tire will offer more rolling resistance and more mass to spin up each time you start out. That means lower mileage. It may also drop you to a less efficient RPM at the speed you want the best mileage. So if any gains are realized it's only after those penalties are made up. In other words, there is probably a better way. A common mistake is to simply think lower RPM means better mileage. If that was true we would all be running around at idle RPM on the highway and expecting 30 MPG. Plus driveability suffers with too low of an RPM.
For instance, a taller, heavier, wider tire will offer more rolling resistance and more mass to spin up each time you start out. That means lower mileage. It may also drop you to a less efficient RPM at the speed you want the best mileage. So if any gains are realized it's only after those penalties are made up. In other words, there is probably a better way. A common mistake is to simply think lower RPM means better mileage. If that was true we would all be running around at idle RPM on the highway and expecting 30 MPG. Plus driveability suffers with too low of an RPM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
silkywoods
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
5
Sep 21, 2007 05:38 PM
signature600
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
28
Jul 17, 2007 03:43 PM
Jmac
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
10
Feb 25, 2005 01:16 PM
hooked3800
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
28
Aug 26, 2004 01:13 PM
cummer01
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
6
May 26, 2004 02:20 PM




