3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only) Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for third generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories. THIS IS FOR THE 5.9L ONLY!

600hp recipe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 08:04 AM
  #16  
gatf4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Lindenhurst IL
I had my air intake off and the hole in the manifold is really small. Unless you guys are enlarging the intake area of the cylinder head and removing the intake heater grid, That area,IMO will be the restriction in the system, not the Air intake horn. I was always taught that in any boosted application that the intake side, under pressure is, far less critical than on an unboosted application. At 50-60psi of boost that is being forced thru instead of drawn thru. If there are dyno tests showing large gains by adding the High ram, than I'm definately wrong. I just thought that in all but the highest HP apllications that it would be a really expensive decoration
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 08:55 AM
  #17  
djbikeman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
From: Omaha
I'm no expert on this stuff, but I think you would want to stud and ring the head with the boost pressure your mods could produce.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 09:18 AM
  #18  
Don M's Avatar
DTR Advertiser
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 1
From: In the Shop
Originally Posted by Mav
I think I have a good idea of how to make 600hp. Im thinking it would cost from 10-13k.

1) all guages
2) Bully dog crazy larry
3) Tst early twins
4) 100hp diesel dynamics injectors
5) f.a.s.s pusher pump
6) Southbend or ats or dtt clutch
7) Banks high ram
8) Banks techni cooler
9) Relentless diesel Arctic air twins
10) 6" stacks

Thats about it but if im missing anything post what im missing
Everything looks good, but keep the stock injectors. They are not bad at all and will give over 600. Add on a set of ARP studs and your there.

Don~
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 09:33 AM
  #19  
JCLeary's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by LinearX
Dare I ask the dumb question....

According to this site, they're using the stock turbo as well. If that is the case, how are drive pressures from one kit going to be significantly lower than another if the stock 9cm2 housing is still in place?

Just curious.
Not a dumb question. Mark Kendrick uses the stock turbo, but he mounts an external wastegate (either a Turbonetics or Tial, 32mm) on it so you're not pushing all the exhaust through the stock turbo. It will make the turbo live longer, and your head gasket happy.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 10:36 AM
  #20  
PanteraGSTK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: New Braunfels, TX
the Racegate WG he uses by Turbonetics is ~$360 from summit. easy to add to the relentless kit. I know why a wastegate is nice to have because you can limit your boost, but wouldn't the relentless kit be OK without a WG? Why is one better/safer?
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 12:34 AM
  #21  
Idaho CTD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
I'm been working on a set up for my truck that uses the stocker over a B2 that I can build with a stock wastegate (which can be opened up and given more travel) just controlled differently or a Tial 38mm. Unlike Kendricks stuff it uses a 2nd gen manifold and unlike the Relentless set up I wont have to add the wastegate to the manifold if I want to add it later. The cold piping and downpipe are the same no matter if it is wastegated or not. The only difference is the hot pipe. I just finished everything but the down pipe on my truck and I'm going to be testing it with the stock wastegate and then the Tial for boost vs. back pressure and egt. The Relentless set up is suppose to have 67psi of back pressure at 50psi of boost so I will try to beat that using the modified stock wastegate. I'd like to be 1:1 or better at 50psi.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 02:54 AM
  #22  
runamuk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento CA
Cancel the High Ram ............useless, and get a 5" exhaust instead of stacks!

Good to go otherwise

Rick
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 05:53 AM
  #23  
plow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: TN
https://www.dieselenginemotor.com/in...e=image&id=332 here's 600hp
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 09:56 AM
  #24  
abc4yew's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 1
From: Maritimes, Canada
Plow, and about 1850 ft lb of torque .

Most twins I have seen have either a waste gate, BOV or just a bypass tube so that excess boost can by pass the top tubo and go straight to the bottom turbo. The advantabe of the tial or similar is that the top turbo will spool very quick and the second it achieves it most efficient zone all excess is routed to the bottom turbo to bump it to its most efficient zone. It is definitely the most efficient and prevents a drive pressure excess. The bypass tube works in the same fashion but it will result in slightly slower spooling. If there is tons of fueling and the bypass tube is spec'd right then it is more efficient as when boost is near the wastegate opening threshold the wg starts to open and this creates a turbulent flow in the bypass tube. Having a fixed by pass tube gives a constant and smooth bypass flow. The truck I was in that used the bypass tube spooled way faster than mine and peaked at 65 psi (WG) in a heartbeat. ks
Reply
Old May 5, 2006 | 01:48 AM
  #25  
dammit's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: rhome, tx
Edited by Admin
Reply
Old May 5, 2006 | 09:02 AM
  #26  
Bart Timothy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 774
Likes: 1
From: West Jordan, Utah
Originally Posted by Mav
I think I have a good idea of how to make 600hp. Im thinking it would cost from 10-13k.

1) all guages
2) Bully dog crazy larry
3) Tst early twins
4) 100hp diesel dynamics injectors
5) f.a.s.s pusher pump
6) Southbend or ats or dtt clutch
7) Banks high ram
8) Banks techni cooler
9) Relentless diesel Arctic air twins
10) 6" stacks

Thats about it but if im missing anything post what im missing
This formula will certainly work for 600 hp, but there's much cheaper ways of doing it. 13k will buy much more than 600hp and, if spent wisely, will buy top honors at almost any dyno event.

First off, ditch the Banks stuff because it's not offering anything, especially when cost is considered. Take the money and spend it on studs, and be money ahead.

Twins are nice, but a Phat Shaft 66 will get you to 600 usable hp much cheaper. Go to the Silver Bullet for even more potential, and still be cheaper. Add water/meth if you want.

The TST - Bully Dog stack has been on many dyno event winners and is a proven combination which works. Keep it.

A Walbro fuel pump with an external pressure regulator and 2 micron Racor filter will be cheaper, quieter and more reliable than the FASS.
Reply
Old May 5, 2006 | 02:09 PM
  #27  
T & T's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Maui
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned a camshaft!!!

Reply
Old May 5, 2006 | 03:03 PM
  #28  
JD Dearden's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 1
From: Been deported back to Utah
Just leave it all stock except for propane and nitrous.
Reply
Old May 6, 2006 | 02:06 AM
  #29  
WUnderwood's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
Originally Posted by JD Dearden
Just leave it all stock except for propane and nitrous.
Like those idiots on Trucks!
Reply
Old May 6, 2006 | 09:00 AM
  #30  
OT-OF-Here's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis
Relentless Twins

Originally Posted by PanteraGSTK
the only difference between this kit and the relentless kit is that it has an external WG. I bet you could get relentless to put a WG turbo or add a wastegate to their kit. or maybe not.
B-4 I bought my set I asked Chris at Relentless if he'd put a wastegate on a set if I went that way and he said Nope!!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 PM.