3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2007 and up 6.7 liter Engine and Drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

fuel milege

Old Mar 20, 2008 | 05:06 PM
  #1  
cowboy1814's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
fuel milege

is anyone else getting crappy fuel milege on their 08 6.7 s
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 05:48 PM
  #2  
coolbreeze's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Redding, Ca
I didn't buy mine for the mileage, I wanted the power
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 06:16 PM
  #3  
GMScott's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 0
From: Pottstown, PA
Originally Posted by cowboy1814
is anyone else getting crappy fuel milege on their 08 6.7 s
Don't know about the 08's but if you're coming from a pre-air pollution equipped diesel to an air pollution equipped diesel you're just gonna have to lower your expectations on the fuel mileage. I have 122k on the clock and the fuel mileage has remained pretty much the same since new. The older diesels used to get better with age. I guess those days are gone and soon to be forgotten as we head into the GREEN future.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 07:09 PM
  #4  
f272272's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
My monitor on my 6.7 has steadily gone up to about 16mpg. I am in the process of doing a real world check. My 95 CTD with about 235k miles get about 21mpg!
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 07:36 PM
  #5  
GMScott's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 0
From: Pottstown, PA
Originally Posted by f272272
My monitor on my 6.7 has steadily gone up to about 16mpg. I am in the process of doing a real world check. My 95 CTD with about 235k miles get about 21mpg!
Yeah, my 04.5 started to get really decent fuel mileage when it got over 100k. It only had a kitty CAT for air pollution control. By the time it hit 200k I was gettin' over 20 m.p.g. too. I don't think we'll see that kind of efficiency out of the 07.5 & up trucks until we get some better technology than what we have at present. The poor Cummins is just plain choked with the current EGR & DPF system. AND don't forget, Dodge learned how to mess with our minds with the overheads once they learned how to integrate better "overhead" fuel mileage into the flashes we all go in for!!
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 09:56 PM
  #6  
Tusker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield, CA
I haven't done a real-world check yet, but my overhead shows 14+ Ctiy and between 18.5 and 23 highway, depending on speed and conditions.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 07:12 AM
  #7  
ebinesar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Tusker
I haven't done a real-world check yet, but my overhead shows 14+ Ctiy and between 18.5 and 23 highway, depending on speed and conditions.
I get abt the same 13.5 city and 18.5 Hwy
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 01:23 PM
  #8  
Cuminapart's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
Tusker , how difficult was the VW into Samurai swap , this sounds very interesting.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 11:09 PM
  #9  
Azzy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
13.6 city

15.9 highway

Both empty
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 10:31 PM
  #10  
Tusker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield, CA
Originally Posted by Cuminapart
Tusker, how difficult was the VW into Samurai swap , this sounds very interesting.
It was a lot of work sourcing out things and getting it all together, but wasn't too tough. I used the 1.9 TD, which I had to get from Canada since it wasn't sold in the States. If I had it to do over again, I would probably use the 1.6TD, just because parts are readily availble here for it. I mated it to a Toyota 5-speed and dual t-cases. With intercooler and some screw driver work, my horsepower is now triple and the torque four times what the stock Sami had. The mileage is double
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 01:08 PM
  #11  
rsvegas's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
I have been getting 12 towing and 14 empty. I knew mileage would be bad with all of the emmission stuff when I bought it though.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 05:55 PM
  #12  
CheddarWedge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: San Angelo, TX.
I am getting 15.5ish city and 18.5ish highway.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 09:44 AM
  #13  
fflarry's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Moyock, NC
15.5-16 empty mixed driving, 17.1 hwy all empty...on a megacab 4x4. The light 2x4 standard cab should get better mpg.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 05:09 PM
  #14  
Dodgezilla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,803
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
I was on the highway today and did some experimenting. My best mileage was at exactly 65 mph. I got a solid 20mpg+ at that speed. If I went down to 60mph the mileage dropped and if I went to 70+ it dropped even more. I was very happy to see 20 though. I am only getting about 13.5 - 14mpg city but I only have 2000 miles on the truck so far....
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 05:31 PM
  #15  
floridagc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Plantation, Florida
Same here as Dodgezilla, exactly to a tee, could have not written it better. I really don't care about mileage,don't get me wrong I like good mileage but it really don't care when I am within 700 miles of home because my supply is endless for now, and the fuel is free, all I need is my vac truck, I love tank upgrades. To bad they won't let me use it on Gov jobs for my hvy equipment because that help my bottom line, if of course its not a T&M Project.

flgc
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 PM.