3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

Brake Rotor Specs ???

Old Aug 28, 2009 | 11:05 AM
  #1  
FMB's Avatar
FMB
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 69
From: Old Norte Mexico
Brake Rotor Specs ???

I had a mechanic put in new U Joints last week and he said my front pads are down to almost nothing (I knew it was about time) and he wanted to change them as he had everything apart. Additionally, he said the rotors couldn't be turned as they are at minimum already. His measurements of the rotors are LF 43.03mm and RF 43.34mm. He states 43mm is the minimum.

These are original rotors, ~177k miles, have gone through original plus 2 pair of replacement OEM pads (on second pair now). The rotors have never been 'turned'. I've not had any issues with these rotors, no warpage or fade.

I didn't gift him the work. Any ideas out there as to the longevity of un-turned rotors? Guess I'll measure when I get in there though.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 02:07 PM
  #2  
.boB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 2
From: Colorado Springs, CO
The service manual does not list the specs. It says that the specs are stamped into the hub.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 02:14 PM
  #3  
bushusmarine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: CA
Not to long ago i did all four corners on my truck at 120k. I also couldnt turn my front ones, but my back are OE and there was barely enough to turn. Where your at sounds about right, your rotors are just worn down. But this is just my opinion
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 03:41 PM
  #4  
torquefan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 47
From: Calgary, Alberta
I would believe that the rotors may be worn out, even without previous machining. They changed the composition of the lining when they switched to dual-piston calipers in 2000. The pads are now really hard on rotors, compared to the older stuff. They seem to wear the rotors on a taper too.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2009 | 11:30 PM
  #5  
trik396's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 1
From: NW Indiana
170,000+ miles on rotors sounds great to me... sounds like you got your money's worth and then some.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2009 | 10:22 AM
  #6  
sdmark's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: San Diego California
Getting that much mileage out of your originals is pretty good. I had to replace my fronts at 80k. Lots of stop and go. I went with EBC rotors and pads up front and saw a vast improvement over stock.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kaysee
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
1
Aug 9, 2009 04:28 PM
06RAMCTD
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
0
Dec 19, 2006 04:15 PM
Dave88LX
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
4
Nov 6, 2005 12:19 AM
7mmrum
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
36
Sep 8, 2004 12:09 PM
Caincando1
HELP!
6
Oct 12, 2003 02:25 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 AM.