3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

4-Lock - No Slip???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2006 | 10:17 PM
  #1  
pet05's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
4-Lock - No Slip???

On my truck when in 4-Lock, going around tight turns in parking lots, its causing a noticeable tire jarring. Is this caused by the 4WD being LOCKED, instead of allowing some slippage as some 4WD vehicles do? I thought the 4WD allowed the inner most tire to unlock as it must travel less than the outer tire.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2006 | 10:55 PM
  #2  
Silver76's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: Texico
That jarring is what it feels like to ruin a front end. "AWD" vehicles are fine on pavement, but our 4X4 systems are not designed to be run on dry pavement. (pp 273 of the owners manual)
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2006 | 12:37 AM
  #3  
jrussell's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Silver76
That jarring is what it feels like to ruin a front end. "AWD" vehicles are fine on pavement, but our 4X4 systems are not designed to be run on dry pavement. (pp 273 of the owners manual)
Only problem is, it happens on snowy/wet pavement just as bad!

I've never had a 4wd that was this bad about it. I can do a U-turn in my Toyota buggy with lockers front and rear on DRY pavement and not have any of the same issues. "Ruin the front end"...it has less than 2k miles and did it since brand new! Unless it was ruined from the factory, it's just very poor engineering IMO.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2006 | 06:51 AM
  #4  
ColdCase's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: Southern NH
Originally Posted by pet05
On my truck when in 4-Lock, going around tight turns in parking lots, its causing a noticeable tire jarring. Is this caused by the 4WD being LOCKED, instead of allowing some slippage as some 4WD vehicles do? I thought the 4WD allowed the inner most tire to unlock as it must travel less than the outer tire.
On turns the outer tire on an axle has to make more turns than the inner so there is a differential to allow that to happen without protest.

Similarly, on turns the front axle has to make more turns than the rear axle, something about physics I think. If you lock the axles together (4-lock) they are forced to turn the same amount, and something has to give. More often than not a tire slips, but sometimes bang, a U-joint or transfer case chain lets go.

AWD systems allow the front and rear axles to turn at different rates (sometimes with some resistance).

I have a mega cab and have not noticed more binding and tire jarring than expected, nothing on dirt. No snow here yet . I think the mega cab has more spring in the frame than other CTDs, which allows the binding to build up a little more before being released via tire slip... perhaps giving you more of a jarring feeling. Like the shudder on backup, one truck is more susceptible than another.

Better tire traction will make for more 4-lock binding, those toyo's may be too good. Otherwise look for something loose, perhaps the transfer case mount.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2006 | 08:58 AM
  #5  
Silver76's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: Texico
My jeep has a locked (Detroit)44 in the front too, and it wasn't that bad on pavement- But the jeep weighs about half of what our trucks do. The front axle on our trucks is pretty stout, but you definitely want to avoid binding it up. Sooner or later, something will let go..
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2006 | 09:35 AM
  #6  
jrussell's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
From: Florida
It was the same with the stock tires too. Doesn't matter if it's dry pavement, 6" of snow, ice, dirt, wet grass, etc...still binds really bad. Seems like the geometry/design of the front axle is just trash.

BTW - My 1st Gen doesn't have this problem at all.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2006 | 10:31 AM
  #7  
bnold's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,184
Likes: 0
From: Dallas area
Comparing the jarring of a 3,000lb jeep to a 8,000 lb ctd is Your jeep or yota whaever has no problem letting the tire slip while in 4 lock because there is less ground pressure. Whn you have 8k divided up over 4 wheels there is a huge increase in ground pressure making the tires not want to slip. The result is the tires don't slip and it binds the suspension up until a point where it finally lets go and gives you that 'jarring feeling' hence don't use 4 lock on dry or hard packed roads. Why would you need it anyways??
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2006 | 10:36 AM
  #8  
HappyGA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: Waycross, GA
what you are feeling is not necessarily the tires, but the binding of the U-joints when you have the wheels turned sharp. They are fine at slight to mid turn, but when you turn sharp, they are being forced through a series or rotations that they do not really want to go through. The binding is not good for U-joints. also the tires do turn at different rates when turned, but all 4 tires are not locked together on our trucks, unless you actually have a locker in, a limited slip rear is not a locker. hence the title limited slip..
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2006 | 11:01 AM
  #9  
jrussell's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by bnold
Comparing the jarring of a 3,000lb jeep to a 8,000 lb ctd is Your jeep or yota whaever has no problem letting the tire slip while in 4 lock because there is less ground pressure. Whn you have 8k divided up over 4 wheels there is a huge increase in ground pressure making the tires not want to slip. The result is the tires don't slip and it binds the suspension up until a point where it finally lets go and gives you that 'jarring feeling' hence don't use 4 lock on dry or hard packed roads. Why would you need it anyways??
Bnold, if you notice, I also compared it to my 7000-8000lb 1st Gen. That kinda disproves your theory. I also mentioned it happens on VERY slippery surfaces like snow and ice...nothing to do with dry roads. I think it's pretty obvious why someone would want 4wd on a snow covered road.

The Jeeps and Toyotas have FULL LOCKERS front and rear and do not have ANY binding or jarring like this. I understand they weigh less, but you're comparing a fully locked 4wd system to a basic system with open diffs. There is no way the fully locked system should perform better when making tight turns...but it does! I'm guessing the Dodge/AAM engineers weren't so good in geometry class.



HappyGA, it's definitely the tires binding and not the U-joints. A U-joint doesn't last more than a second or two when bound up and torque is applied. Besides, the U-joints are rotating the same whether in 2wd or 4wd and the problem only occurs in 4wd.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2006 | 11:26 AM
  #10  
RustyJC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 4
From: Cypress, TX
In 4 lock, you have no center differential. An AWD vehicle has a center differential to allow the front and rear axles to turn at different speeds. With the front and rear driveshafts forced to turn at the same speed, something has to give in a corner. If you're lucky, it's tire slip.

Rusty
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #11  
jrussell's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by RustyJC
In 4 lock, you have no center differential. An AWD vehicle has a center differential to allow the front and rear axles to turn at different speeds. With the front and rear driveshafts forced to turn at the same speed, something has to give in a corner. If you're lucky, it's tire slip.

Rusty
Wouldn't the rear tires be more likely to slip in this situation (much less weight over the rear)?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2006 | 07:07 PM
  #12  
pet05's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Well, it was snowing here but when I turned into a parking lot that is when I noticed the jarring.

I figure it is best to just switch the 4-Lock to 2-WD when in tight turns (backing,etc.) or parking lots. I think that it is much less wear & tear switching from 2WD to 4WD & then back, than to have it bind in 4WD in tight turns. Plus, I thought the U-Joints are CONSTANTLY turning even in 2WD, switching to 4WD just locks them?!???

My BFG TKO's have good grip so that probably doesn't help things.

HAS ANYONE LOST A U-JOINT DUE TO THE "BINDING"???
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2006 | 12:08 AM
  #13  
Silver76's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: Texico
I've seen plenty of U-joints fail in the rocks, but never seen it happen on daily drivers (except for driveshaft ujoints)
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2006 | 11:04 AM
  #14  
bighornram's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 684
Likes: 1
From: Delta, PA
If it binds in 4wd, -on pavement - Take it out of 4wd

Even in 6 inches of snow, I rarely use 4wd, and if I am in 4wd, im not trying to make a U-turn. If the front tires are biting enough while turning to cause binding rather than the tire slipping, I would say chances are the back tires have enough traction to make using 4wd unnecessary.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2006 | 11:07 AM
  #15  
jrussell's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by bighornram
If it binds in 4wd, -on pavement - Take it out of 4wd

Even in 6 inches of snow, I rarely use 4wd, and if I am in 4wd, im not trying to make a U-turn. If the front tires are biting enough while turning to cause binding rather than the tire slipping, I would say chances are the back tires have enough traction to make using 4wd unnecessary.
Not sure what the terrain is like where you are, but 1" of snow will make 2wd useless in many places around here. In a sloped parking lot 2wd will have you sliding into the cars next to you.

It still doesn't change the fact that most 4wd trucks don't have this problem.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM.