3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

3500 Lbs. Payload in SWB 2500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 08:03 AM
  #1  
Mark Hodowanec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
From: VA
3500 Lbs. Payload in SWB 2500

Hauled 5 yds. of mulch in my short wheel base 2500 - think that it was about 3500 lbs. or so. It was loaded pretty high, but I was surprized that the suspension did not handle the load any better - the truck squated about 4.5" & seemed to sway real easy.

Thought it would do a little better, but I guess that I should complain - it got the load home, and I never felt out of control or as if the truck was driving me. Just had to be a litle more careful.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 08:43 AM
  #2  
TonyB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 1
From: Gilbert, Az
I think (someone correct me if i'm wrong) the 2500's are rated for 9900 gvw. Which means the truck should be able to handle ~2400lb (9900-7500 truck weight = 2400).

That might explain the sway.

Tony
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 08:48 AM
  #3  
carcrz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: Belton, MO
I had to put airbags on mine to haul a pallet of chemicals. It sagged way down & I didn't feel comfortable doing it if I didn't have to.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 08:51 AM
  #4  
Mark Hodowanec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by carcrz
I had to put airbags on mine to haul a pallet of chemicals. It sagged way down & I didn't feel comfortable doing it if I didn't have to.
If I had to do this often, I would put in airbags or helper springs. Like I said, it handled it, just not as well as I would have liked.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 08:53 AM
  #5  
Mark Hodowanec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by TonyB
I think (someone correct me if i'm wrong) the 2500's are rated for 9900 gvw. Which means the truck should be able to handle ~2400lb (9900-7500 truck weight = 2400).Tony
I believe that the SRW 3500 has a 9900 lbs. GVWR. I think that the 2500 is only 9000. I don't know the wqeight of my truck but think it's closer to 7200 lbs. So, yes, I knew that I was a little overloaded based on door sticker, at least.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 10:28 AM
  #6  
jkitterman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
You were over payload by about 1750-2000 lbs.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 08:53 PM
  #7  
bigwheels94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: Anacortes Wa.
Put some air springs,& sway bars on it.I haul a 3000# slide in camper for a couple months @ a time hunting.No problems.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 09:59 PM
  #8  
dan1912's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: nebraska
Originally Posted by Mark Hodowanec
Hauled 5 yds. of mulch in my short wheel base 2500 - think that it was about 3500 lbs. or so. It was loaded pretty high, but I was surprized that the suspension did not handle the load any better - the truck squated about 4.5" & seemed to sway real easy.

Thought it would do a little better, but I guess that I should complain - it got the load home, and I never felt out of control or as if the truck was driving me. Just had to be a litle more careful.
You got 5 yards of mulch in your truck? Last time I put 5 yards of mulch in anything was a 12x8 dump trailor and it was falling out of the trailor because it was so full! WOW! It must of been a pile about 16 feet tall in your short wheelbase truck!
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 06:00 AM
  #9  
Mark Hodowanec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by dan1912
You got 5 yards of mulch in your truck? Last time I put 5 yards of mulch in anything was a 12x8 dump trailor and it was falling out of the trailor because it was so full! WOW! It must of been a pile about 16 feet tall in your short wheelbase truck!
It was a pallet of bagged mulch:
45 bags @ 3 cu.ft. per bag = 135 cu.ft = 5 cu.yds.
With the bed being 6.25 ft. long & 5.5 ft. wide, 135 cu.ft. works out to be a pile just under 4 ft. tall, which is about what it was!

The bags were strapped down to make sure they would not topple off of the top/sides.

See, you can get these baby short beds to do some work...you just have to wiork harder to do it. GOD I WISH I GOT A LONG BED!!!
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 07:29 AM
  #10  
davedye's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Milton, Pa
I have a 2500 CTD and I haul a Lance 845 truck camper on mine all the time. Dry weight, 2400lbs, wet weight, probably 3400lbs???. I have Firestone RideRite airbags and a Helwig sway bar, don't know it's back there. I also pull a 3500lb boat.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 10:31 AM
  #11  
kev94mx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: NC
Dont feel bad about your 2500. I have a 06 3500 dually and it squats almost as bad as my 2500. I put my timbren springs on it that I had on my 2500. They cure the problem but it rides stiffer. All 2500 & 3500 trucks made today seem to have softer springs in them. Look at the 2 generation dodge trucks now they had some real springs.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 06:48 PM
  #12  
eightball's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, Calif.
I'm kind of old school when loading a p.u. bed.

I keep checking the rear leaf springs to see how close they're getting to not having any bow in them, or are almost horizontal or straight across. Then I stop loading.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KodiakAlaska
Towing and Hauling / RV
4
Aug 12, 2012 05:24 PM
Mark Hodowanec
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
21
Oct 31, 2008 10:49 PM
dalee
Towing and Hauling / RV
17
Oct 10, 2006 06:51 PM
Fleg
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
15
Apr 14, 2006 09:01 PM
JImbo1
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
1
Aug 27, 2003 08:13 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 AM.