2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain Discussion for all Dodge Rams from 1994 through 2002. Please, no engine or drivetrain discussion.

1999 dodge 2500 4x4 brakes

Old Sep 7, 2011 | 03:56 AM
  #16  
2500's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
WOW .. what a link!!!

contains all the info needed to do a dana 60 conversion for 94-98.5 12v
of course I just laid out $$$ for two new sealed bearing hubs


Originally Posted by totalloser
Spinning hubs uses virtually no fuel. The fuel is wasted only if you have full time 4x4. The drag is from turning the ring and pinion, thus CAD equiped trucks use virtually no more fuel than manual hub trucks with the hubs out (big myth).

Having said that, if you have non-slip rotors you probably have the old balljoint setup. If you have the old setup with the balljoints in the knuckle, the Ford knuckles will fit.

Many vehicles use some version of the CAD system (for instance ADD on Toyota trucks) to accomplish this efficiency savings by disconnecting the long side inner axleshaft. When disconnected, the short side spins the diff carrier side gear, and the spider gears walk spinning the disconnected short shaft with virtually no resistance.

Of full time axles, reverse rotation is the worst because in 2wd the road effectively pushes the "coast" side of the gear which creates more drag than the "drive" side of the gear. Dodges use standard rotation gears, so there is less drag even in a full time setup. Don't expect big jumps in efficiency from this kind of mod. Expect serviceable bearings that are more precise, stronger, longer lasting brakes, tighter steering, no death wobble (t steering versus y) and instant in and out 4x when the hubs are locked compared with slow mo CAD system.

Here's a SICK writeup of the conversion to Ford knuckles/brakes http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=874442

Keep in mind that with this swap the diameter of the brake rotors is about the same, but the ID of the friction contact is much smaller, so the difference between the inner friction to outer friction surface is MUCH MUCH larger so you have dramatically more pad contact even though the diameter isn't really bigger. IE much better brakes.

Also, if you have 4wheel abs versus rwal you will need to address the reluctor ring/sensor issue on the hubs to make your abs system work. Dynatrac has these for their custom axles- they use a ring that presses on the inside OD of the hub and a mount for the sensor to tuck inside between the rotor and hub. Might require lathe work on the hub to machine the OD to match press fit for reluctor ring.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
d man
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
5
Oct 2, 2012 11:42 AM
d man
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
2
Sep 28, 2012 12:13 PM
mr4732
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
12
Oct 21, 2007 05:12 AM
Cummins600
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
2
Sep 10, 2007 09:34 PM
V.R.Wheeler
HELP!
1
Aug 4, 2007 01:00 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 AM.