So from all of the research i have gathered, non i/c pistons have a larger bowl, and a point more compression than the i/c version. If anybody has a picture, please post. There is a picture floating around with intercooled vs marine, but not i/c vs non i/c.

Does anybody know the spray angle/pattern of the stock 4 hole non i/c injectors?

From most things i have read so far, marine injectors, or pods for that matter would work well with the non i/c pistons.

Anybody have any input on this?
Thanks...

 

i have pictures of my pistons with the head off, but nothing to show comparison between i/c and non i/c. i can still post if you'd like.

 

sure, maybe somebody has pics of an intercooled piston they could post, then it could all be in one thread...

 

Here is a pic of marine vs an i/c of some sort. Not sure if its late 1st gen or early 2nd gen.

 

correct me if im wrong but would the marine engine have more compression?

 

Here is a N/IC piston in my 90

 

i love my pods in my non ic 91, i didnt see much more heat than my stockers

 

Anybody have an application list of marine injectors? Im thinking about trying a set on my pig...

What would have to be done to 370s to make them work? Bore adapters, and pop pressure reset?

 

ive ran pods in both i/c and non i/c motors. they run a litttle cleaner in non i/c becuase of different bowl.they make a little more power vs stock 4x12 non i/c injector. however ther stock non i/c injector is a great all around injector, i would still run them if i hadnt switched heads on my crewcab ford. i still run them in the farm truck.

 

Oilcan
Smaller bowl might not mean higher compression. That can be controled by "compression height". That is the distance from the wristpin center to the top of the piston.
Ray

 

i dont see paying that money for PODs when you have non-ic injectors. go big or go home