1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

effects of where you enlarge the exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 10:43 PM
  #1  
BigWaylon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte
effects of where you enlarge the exhaust

been doing a bit of reading tonight on exhaust...basically seeing a lot of different setups, but haven't found a good explanation on "why" things were done, and what the power/EGT advantages/disadvantages will be...

It seems the stock downpipe is 3", and there are a couple 4" DP's available...

I've seen some run a 3" DP, then 4" pipe, then 5" stacks...

I just bought my 350 on Saturday, and the owner gave me two 5" stainless stacks that he never installed...

I figured I'd replace the muffler with a straight pipe, and then turn it up into the bed right behind the cab, and split it to the stacks...

should the straight pipe be 3"? 4"? 5"?

do they make 3"-5" adapters, or will I have to go with 4" in the middle?

any real harm in leaving the 3" DP?

Thanks.
Greg
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 10:50 PM
  #2  
rebal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,899
Likes: 3
From: Yuba city Kalifornia
no harm leaving it 3" if you got a 4" DP you might lower EGTs 50* .my sons 90 has 3" all the way back to the bed then turns up to 4" then 5" up to the stacks. heres a link for parts if you need, good people to deal with.






http://www.airflo.com/
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 10:52 PM
  #3  
BigWaylon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte
Originally Posted by rebal
no harm leaving it 3" if you got a 4" DP you might lower EGTs 50* .my sons 90 has 3" all the way back to the bed then turns up to 4" then 5" up to the stacks. heres a link for parts if you need, good people to deal with.






http://www.airflo.com/

thanks for the input, and the link...but I've got a local source that's gonna take care of me...

me and a friend are doing stacks at the same time, and his girlfriend's brother works at a local big-rig shop, and can get us the 4" pipe and elbows for dirt

Greg
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 11:10 PM
  #4  
BearKiller's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 95
From: KENTUCKY
I am no scientist/engineer; but, in my way of thinking, exhaust tubing need be no larger than cylinder bore, so long as it isn't excessively long.

Only one cylinder at a time is pumping exhaust into the system; and, it is not possible for more exhaust volume to be present than the volume of bore times stroke.

Of course, I could be wrong.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 06:49 AM
  #5  
BigWaylon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte
Originally Posted by BearKiller
I am no scientist/engineer; but, in my way of thinking, exhaust tubing need be no larger than cylinder bore, so long as it isn't excessively long.

Only one cylinder at a time is pumping exhaust into the system; and, it is not possible for more exhaust volume to be present than the volume of bore times stroke.

Of course, I could be wrong.

in "theory" I'd have to agree with you as far as volume/flow...

the EGT would be the difference, though...

Greg
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 09:38 AM
  #6  
Jeremy Cusick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Allendale, IL
This is how I did mine ('95 1 ton): stock downpipe and exh pipe to where the cat was, 3.5"-4" adapter, 4" pipe on back, over the passenger frame rail, up thru the bed to a 4"-5" adapter to a 5" stack. It's really not too hard to do.
I even bought some heavy steel strapping from a hardware store w/ pre-punched holes along its length for using as hangers underneath. The stuff is just over 1/16" thick and a good 1" wide... comes in 3' lengths.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 12:44 PM
  #7  
90firstgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 753
Likes: 1
From: Salina, Kansas
Originally Posted by BearKiller
I am no scientist/engineer; but, in my way of thinking, exhaust tubing need be no larger than cylinder bore, so long as it isn't excessively long.

Only one cylinder at a time is pumping exhaust into the system; and, it is not possible for more exhaust volume to be present than the volume of bore times stroke.

Of course, I could be wrong.
There is actually more air in there than just bore x stroke. The air is compressed coming into the cylinder and stays compressed until it gets out of the head. The gases then expand from there, and after it gets past the turbo housing, the air expands even more and the velocity slows down as the air cools. Which makes it harder to push out of the pipe. So larger pipe is definately a benefit for getting air out.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 05:53 PM
  #8  
Cowboy_Customs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 0
From: Port Crane (Binghamton) NY
I posted in your other post saying something about a 4" DP. I got mine from here: http://www.sourceautomotive.biz
Rip was awesome to deal with! I purchased the DP with adapters, and he even took the time to mark where the 3-4 adapter needed to be cut!
I paid 170 for the assy. and shipping. It took around 3 hours for the cutting, welding, and measuring aspect, and 2 minutes to put it in, I swear Cummins had a dodge sittin next to the engine when they designed it, it fits PERFECT! just make sure you take your time when you do it otherwise the stock bellhousing mount wont work, (the cuts, and welding for the adapter, and the old flange need to be almost perfect) and make sure you have a 4 inch clamp to mount it using the bellhousing mount.
A larger DP will aid in spooling, and EGT's. A stock DP can only handle so much air, so if its getting backpressure on the turbo this will only slow it down, so the larger DP will give it that much more room for air.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 06:24 PM
  #9  
G1625S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,767
Likes: 5
From: port crane, NY
Originally Posted by Jeremy Cusick
This is how I did mine ('95 1 ton): stock downpipe and exh pipe to where the cat was, 3.5"-4" adapter, 4" pipe on back, over the passenger frame rail, up thru the bed to a 4"-5" adapter to a 5" stack. It's really not too hard to do.
I even bought some heavy steel strapping from a hardware store w/ pre-punched holes along its length for using as hangers underneath. The stuff is just over 1/16" thick and a good 1" wide... comes in 3' lengths.

Hey Jeremy, nice stack! Wonder where the twin to that one is?
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 01:56 AM
  #10  
swank's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
From: idaho
and keep in mind that the difference in pressure before and after the turbo is what makes it work. i think .
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 10:18 AM
  #11  
mhuppertz's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,053
Likes: 135
From: Tijeras, New Mexico, 7,000ft up
Originally Posted by BearKiller
I am no scientist/engineer; but, in my way of thinking, exhaust tubing need be no larger than cylinder bore, so long as it isn't excessively long....
You would be correct if there was no combustion involved, but the expansion of the gasses necessitate larger pipe to keep backpressure down. We are lucky with diesel because it's not still burning in the exhaust like a gasser!
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 10:26 AM
  #12  
edwinsmith's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 1,063
From: Commerce, OK
Originally Posted by swank
and keep in mind that the difference in pressure before and after the turbo is what makes it work. i think .
Yes, that's exactly right. When the gas expands it's temp drops with the pressure. This creates a greater differential across the turbine which makes it spin faster.

I would be wary of going smaller down the line however because you could setup an accoustic reflection which puts pressure pulses backward and hurts performance at some RPM. The turbo mitigates this effect some of course.

Edwin
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 01:37 PM
  #13  
BearKiller's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 95
From: KENTUCKY
Originally Posted by mhuppertz
We are lucky with diesel because it's not still burning in the exhaust like a gasser!
Then where do the occassional flames from my stacks come from??
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 01:45 PM
  #14  
swank's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
From: idaho
uhhhmmm,,,,,,,,,chili?
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 02:49 PM
  #15  
mhuppertz's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,053
Likes: 135
From: Tijeras, New Mexico, 7,000ft up
Originally Posted by BearKiller
Then where do the occassional flames from my stacks come from??
Beans? I meant generally, not of a fire breather like yours!
Generally, exhaust temps are WAY lower on a diesel because of this.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 AM.