12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain Talk about the 12V engine and drivetrain here. This is for 1994-1998.5 engine and drivetrain discussion only.

smoke

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2003 | 09:27 PM
  #1  
jman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Navarre , FL
smoke

HI all in the group,,, i just did a gear change from 4:10 to 3:55, no problem there but realy wount do that again what i was wondering is the truck used to smoke a lot , (not problem) now with the new gears in there not much smoke anymore,, thanks jman (98 12v 5speed now with 3:55, tst#12 qaud,longbed)
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2003 | 09:41 PM
  #2  
SmokinDodge12V's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: Salem,In.
Re:smoke

Do you have less when first accelerating or at wot, with a swap to 3:55 I would think you would have a little more smoke from accl.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2003 | 09:07 AM
  #3  
jman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Navarre , FL
Re:smoke


It used to smoke at accelarating,(a lot) not to much at wot untill it was around 2600 +rpm hard on it , theres one thing i seen that the turbo pressure come on much faster on accelerating, i dont think theres a problem with the motor, it just seems odd to me
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2003 | 10:51 AM
  #4  
tmiller24's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Dayton,Ohio
Re:smoke

Fueling curve must've been real close and the extra load of the taller gears has the turbo matching the fuel better now. That's my guess.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 09:06 PM
  #5  
1dslram's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Downey, CA
Re:smoke

I just went from 355 to 373 and cut my smoke by about 25-30%. It seems odd that working the engine harder would reduce the smoke, there has to be other factors involved.
Bruce
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2003 | 12:59 AM
  #6  
cwbronc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Hampden-Sydney, VA
Re:smoke

I'm still new to all of this but since the smoke is just unburnt fuel, when the engine works harder it burns more of the fuel therefore reducing the smoke. Seems to make sense to me, but just a theory.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2003 | 01:03 AM
  #7  
cwbronc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Hampden-Sydney, VA
Re:smoke

Also...little OT, but I would love some smoke and power but not much $, what would be a good easy first step? Currently no mods except for exaust. just wondering thanks -Cody
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2003 | 11:34 AM
  #8  
DRM's Avatar
DRM
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
From: Spring Hill, TN
Re:smoke

[quote author=cwbronc link=board=16;threadid=23566;start=0#msg224247 date=1071557995]
I'm still new to all of this but since the smoke is just unburnt fuel, when the engine works harder it burns more of the fuel therefore reducing the smoke. Seems to make sense to me, but just a theory.
[/quote]

Then I guess it is a good thing (as far as fuel burn is concerned) that my truck does not smoke at all? ???
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2003 | 01:04 AM
  #9  
cwbronc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Hampden-Sydney, VA
Re:smoke

Well it's burning all of the fuel it's getting, but it may be able to burn even more (more fuel= more power). Also it sure does look sweet when someone "smokes" a ricer. It's a pref. thing. as well.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bensdad_canada
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
1
May 9, 2005 10:56 PM
dhe9
24 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
2
Nov 14, 2003 07:31 AM
PK
24 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
6
Oct 19, 2003 10:28 AM
jbs007
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
3
Jul 8, 2003 01:29 AM
97CTD
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
4
Mar 17, 2003 08:14 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 AM.