Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for second generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories.

Twins VS Twins hmm who will win?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2005, 09:29 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
storx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Twins VS Twins hmm who will win?

ok here it is... there a local guy who is a fanatic about VW tdi engine and has an 99 hatchback golf with the 1.9L TDI engine with a TDIRacing.com Twin Turbo kit pushing 190HP and 374Pds of torque from when i seen the dyno sheet. He is selling his car to buy one of the New 07 PDI Golfs with the 2.2L PDI turbo diesel engine.....but i told him i was interested only if he could proove that his car is faster then my truck... I was most likely going to buy the car either way because of how much he wants for it but yeah now it has become more of a show off challenge.....

2000 Twin Turbo Cummins 5.9L Vs 1999 Twin Turbo TDI 1.9L
Old 12-23-2005, 09:33 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Beast2B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
well, even if he wins the drag race, have him hook to a sled or my 12k toy hauler for the next part of the competition. or try a 500 mile highway run and see who has cramped legs at the end!
I love my barca-lounger on wheels!
Old 12-23-2005, 10:17 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
ratsun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wet Coast, Canada
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
HaHa sounds like fun!
Better try and find a long track
Old 12-23-2005, 10:54 AM
  #4  
Muted User
 
600 Megawatts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
190/374 in a tdi, and you are not gonna even be close....

BUT, 190/374 does not sound correct for a 1.9L engine....


KP
Old 12-23-2005, 11:07 AM
  #5  
Chapter President
 
CTD NUT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Caistor Centre, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,539
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by 600 Megawatts
190/374 in a tdi, and you are not gonna even be close....

BUT, 190/374 does not sound correct for a 1.9L engine....


KP
It could be correct.....but we will never know if we don't know the rpm that these peaks occur at.
Old 12-23-2005, 11:19 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
zukgod1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UTAH
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
he may take you off the line but once that Cummins starts spinning he better not have his window down.

dan
Old 12-23-2005, 11:27 AM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
storx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i dont know what he has besides the twins because the engine bay is crammed.....the turbos had TDIracing.com etched into the casings but when i went to there site i couldnt find the specs on the twins.... also they had a chip and fuel stick combo that would put the power close to what he has without getting the twins.... the distance track is a good idea but he has been getting 35-39mpg on highway easly and i dont even come close to that.. haha
Old 12-23-2005, 11:50 AM
  #8  
Muted User
 
600 Megawatts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dont get me wrong, I am not saying that 374 is impossible on a 1.9L engine, but what I am saying is that it IS a tiny 1.9L engine, and as such I am sure it turns some decent RPM.. so if it made 374 Ft*Lbs at even only 4,000 RPM, then thats 285 HP, and I would bet that little sucker winds up more than that... So thats all I was saying, the ratio of HP to Torque seems way out of whack for a small displacement, high RPM engine.


KP
Old 12-23-2005, 11:56 AM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
storx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the only thing i dont like about his car is that its a 5 speed and there are plenty of options to put 6 speed trannys in them from what i did in research last night... there a company that sells a 7 speed manual in germany.... for 2200.00 dollars
Old 12-23-2005, 12:51 PM
  #10  
Chapter President
 
CTD NUT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Caistor Centre, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,539
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by 600 Megawatts
Dont get me wrong, I am not saying that 374 is impossible on a 1.9L engine, but what I am saying is that it IS a tiny 1.9L engine, and as such I am sure it turns some decent RPM.. so if it made 374 Ft*Lbs at even only 4,000 RPM, then thats 285 HP, and I would bet that little sucker winds up more than that... So thats all I was saying, the ratio of HP to Torque seems way out of whack for a small displacement, high RPM engine.


KP
Hmm......I see what you mean.......looks like peak hp would have to occur below 3000 rpm with 374 ft/lbs and I suspect that isn't too likely with a twin turbo'd 1.9 L......374 ft/lbs at 3000 rpm is still 213 hp.
Old 12-23-2005, 12:58 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
storx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im curious to understand where are yall getting at with this figures of 374ft and 213hp at 3000 rpms.....is there a basic formula yall going by?....
Old 12-23-2005, 01:07 PM
  #12  
Chapter President
 
CTD NUT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Caistor Centre, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,539
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Yes, there are a few basic formulas....

HP = Torque (RPM/5252)

Torque = (HP x 5252) / RPM
Old 12-23-2005, 02:02 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
ramtd02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
remember that these basic formulas are in now way 100 percent correct. they are just guidelines!! And in fact they are geared more towards the predictability of a gasser. NOT our torque monster diesels!!

EG. My truck wehn stock dynoed 174 hp@2700 rpm. The formula suggests my torque should be around 338 TQ.....But I dynoed at 386 TQ from 1700-2650.
Old 12-23-2005, 02:04 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
ramtd02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just an add on....the formula might be closer when considering torque values at that rpm the hp is occuring.....not max peak.
Old 12-23-2005, 02:19 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
timbeaux38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Moody, AL
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
190 hp.....with twins on a VW? that is weak.. I have a buddy pushing close to that with nozzles and programming on an 05 passat... careful with this guy there are TDI's over 3 bills in europe all day long... http://video.thedieselgarage.com/Pla...8&t=recent&p=3


Quick Reply: Twins VS Twins hmm who will win?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.