Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for second generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories.

F1 injectors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 12:05 PM
  #31  
SO5.9's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Kerrville, TX
Originally Posted by Flatbed24v
I would love to go for a ride to feel the injector power if you don't mind
pm'ing you my phone number. Ill let you make your own decision about what is a good size injector for ya.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 01:29 PM
  #32  
mcoleman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 0
From: Backwoods of Missouri CSA
Originally Posted by RowJ
None ....if you drive both the same. I lost no mileage going from Mach 2's to 4's to 6's..... unless I play hard!

RJ
I lost no mileage going from stock to 3s and then to 4s. I actually gained mileage with the 4s over the 3s.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 01:52 PM
  #33  
mishkaya's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by RowJ
None ....if you drive both the same. I lost no mileage going from Mach 2's to 4's to 6's..... unless I play hard!

RJ
I lost about 1/2 mpg going from the 4's to the 6's, but I think that is very reasonable considering the difference. I lost nothing at all going from the 1.6's to the 4's though. Was very impressed with that.
mishkaya
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 04:18 PM
  #34  
quicksilvr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Looks like 4s for me I am on the stock turbo, but I don't tow. Hopefully they will be ok. Anyone had 4s at 8000+ elevation NOT towing with a stock turbo? I don't live that high, but I do make trips up in the winter.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 07:37 PM
  #35  
graphitecumnz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, Kansas
I'd also add that I daily drive with Mach 5's... with the caveat being that I have twin turbos. I don't have a smoke problem and since I don't talk or blab on my phone while I drive I don't have to worry about that either...
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 10:06 PM
  #36  
Fern's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
How heavy is "towing heavy"? How much cooler are the EGT's comparing a SPS62 vs. PS62?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2008 | 11:04 AM
  #37  
RowJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,234
Likes: 1
From: Texas/Oklahoma Border
I consider heavy towing anything over say....15,000 lbs. That's with an Automatic. 6 speed members probably talk around 20,000 lbs.

I read about 200* difference on those turbos. But that's at top end - WOT. Towing might be, I suspect, a reverse scenario.

RJ
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2008 | 11:05 PM
  #38  
bridleman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: Montana
Originally Posted by HOHN
The Mach 4s will have somewhat reasonable EGTs on level ground and in "normal" towing situations.

The problem will come when you start to use the much higher levels of power that these injectors can provide. Just because you have 400hp worth of fuel doesn't mean that you can go charging up a hill as if you have a 400hp ISX under the hood.

Ultimate towing power available isn't just a function of having the fuel available, but you have to be able to burn it completely enough and early enough to keep temperatures under control.

To me, that means optimizing the turbo's "sweet spot" to coincide with the load and RPM conditions where you will use it the most.

The "sweet spot" of the stock turbo is too low for towing heavy with large amounts of fuel. If scale back the power, it works well-- but at higher power levels the turbine is too restrictive. You really need a larger turbine, not just a larger turbine housing imo.

This is where a larger turbine like the 71mm size used by HTT and II can be so beneficial. While it has a little more lag (it takes more gasflow to get into its range), it will also perform better at the higher flow levels required to tow at higher power levels.


If you're willing to limit the power you use, you can tow just fine with the M4s except for extreme cases (thin air, extra heavy load, etc)
Well put HOHN, you just described me to a tee......except that I still have a cracked I/C and exhaust manifold that I am trying to find time to replace . That being said I tow in relatively high elevations and I am going over passes every direction I go hauling about 15,000 to 18,000 lbs I know when I get these leaks fixed I will have better results but right now it is very HOT( I am easy seeing 1500 in no time flat if I don't pay attention which is not fun ) and I go up 7000 to 8000 foot passes in third gear and 25 to 30 mph when I am loaded. So I can't utilize any of what I have. But for those that are in lower elevations I'm sure they see way better results with that size injector. I still love these injectors and don't plan I removing them I just need to get off my dead behind and fix some stuff to get it running a little cooler and a different fueling box. But I say go for the Mach 4's all in all they are a great injector.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 10:11 AM
  #39  
12valve's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 2
From: Mexico!
How much dyno horse power can be made with the Mach 4 injectors? and a turbo upgrade and a good box?
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 10:47 AM
  #40  
RowJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,234
Likes: 1
From: Texas/Oklahoma Border
Originally Posted by 12valve
How much dyno horse power can be made with the Mach 4 injectors? and a turbo upgrade and a good box?
550 HP is doable.... on a Dynojet (honest readout)... with the right combo! A lot more if your into NOS.

RJ
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 11:04 AM
  #41  
dieselfan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
From: Lake Charles,Louisiana
Originally Posted by 12valve
How much dyno horse power can be made with the Mach 4 injectors? and a turbo upgrade and a good box?

Paulb did 510 with a single and 565 with twins IIRC m4's and drag comp.

in high altitude.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 02:56 PM
  #42  
Philabuster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 316
Likes: 1
From: Tempe, AZ
Originally Posted by Mike Holmen
Dynomite makes a decent clean low egt injector as well. I've ran both DDP and mach's, I like both just Don's has a longer waiting time for sticks. DDP will have them on the shelf. Is Don back making sticks again?
Rip Rook had a set of Mach 1.6's and Mach 4's on the shelf when I ordered the M1.6's. I was trying to decide between the two sizes and he said he had them both in stock.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 07:48 PM
  #43  
HOHN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 6
From: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Originally Posted by dieselfan
Paulb did 510 with a single and 565 with twins IIRC m4's and drag comp.

in high altitude.

I'd be willing to bet that the M4s could make 600 with a healthy dose of nitrous.

jmo
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 09:32 PM
  #44  
Flatbed24v's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: stephenville, tx
if I want to go over 500 hp with the Mach 4's (I hope to reach 700-800 hp) what problems will I run in to with them?
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 10:36 PM
  #45  
dieselfan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
From: Lake Charles,Louisiana
Originally Posted by HOHN
I'd be willing to bet that the M4s could make 600 with a healthy dose of nitrous.

jmo

no doubt 600 would be easy on spray.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 PM.