Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for second generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories.

*Ouch* The Bug Has Bit(Injectors)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 10:12 PM
  #1  
iker42's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 2
From: Christiana,Pa
*Ouch* The Bug Has Bit(Injectors)

So we now get to beef up the trans a little bit, so with that, we were thinking about throwing some mild injectors in to acompany the EZ.

Now should we go with edge stage 1-3 nozzles or try some rv275's?

Whoes got exp. on the stock truck with mild injectors?

Smoke?

Mike
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 10:45 PM
  #2  
BBA's Avatar
BBA
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: Sulphur Springs, Tx
I had to run my truck stock for about 3 weeks with the jammers stage 5 in my truck and it would blow some smoke and it felt much stronger than stock of course. The only thing i noticed is fuel pressure wanted to get low with just injectors i would make sure there is some kind of fuel system on there to help out before you put injectors in there. JMO.

Kevin
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 10:46 PM
  #3  
bama's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: alabama
iker,,the ez with 275`s runs pretty good,probably be the best your gonna do on fuel mileage as well.......that said,id go with some injectors in the 80 hp range though as a minimum(as long as you have some tranny mods already)...mileage probably 1.5 off the 275`s,but much better power.i really like 100 hp sticks,but mileage goes away,and smoke gets worse on humid days........for edge sticks,id call city diesel in decatur alabama,they pop test and match all sets,as you probably have read the jammers have a tendency to come a little unmatched..........bama
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 10:49 PM
  #4  
iker42's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 2
From: Christiana,Pa
so prolly jammer stage 3 nozzels or 275's? know where to get hte 275s?
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 11:01 PM
  #5  
displacedtexan's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
From: Place with no quail:(
Ebay would be the cheapest.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 11:14 PM
  #6  
iker42's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 2
From: Christiana,Pa
anyone have a part number
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 11:40 PM
  #7  
Cameronc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Are 275's better quality then jammers.. i don't know why i'm asking just looked them up and where a little bit more then jammer 1's about the same price as jammer 2's... are 275's still 7 hole vs. jammers which are 8.. is that why jammers smoke more and tend to run hotter.. just wondering i'm a rookie at the injector thing??
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 12:14 AM
  #8  
HOHN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 6
From: Cummins Technical Center, IN
I'd choose the 275s over Jammers if for nothing else that they are made by Bosch to certified OEM standards, while Jammers are imported.

I'd choose the 275s every time under 50hp.

Don't get wrapped up in hole count-- there are some very clean 6-hole injectors and slobbery 8 hole ones.

I'd go with 275s and a Quad XZT+ or Smarty. Awesome, clean combo with low EGT and good safety and mpg.

The Mach 1s are much more expensive, but they are incredibly clean and about 20hp more than the 275s.

JH
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 12:20 AM
  #9  
Shortshift's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 149
Likes: 1
From: So. Cal. USA
Got mine from Source Automotive (Rip Rook) He has a great reputation and you know youre getting genuine Bosch ones not possible knock-offs from ebay (which i have heard are out there) Good price - Excellent seller. I am not affiliated with him just giving a known good source to consider.

I actually went down to 275's from a larger set to see what kind of fuel mileage increase I would see. It wasnt much of an increase actually but they run smoother and the truck is more fun to drive now although it doesnt have that "brute" torque feeling it had before.

As an afterthought, and after speaking with Rip and a few others, the Mach 1 as in 1.0 would probably have netted slightly better mileage and I would have had about 20-30 more HP than the 275s as well..

I really like the 275's and for the price they are a great value, but Mach 1's are what Im wishing I had now.. Something else to consider.. They will give you an honest 65 HP increase at the wheels and dont overfuel your truck and require alot of other items to support them.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 12:42 AM
  #10  
HOHN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 6
From: Cummins Technical Center, IN
I installed a set of Mach 1.0s in a friend's truck, and they are an absolutely incredible injector. Really clean even in summer air at 6000 feet!

justin
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 12:54 AM
  #11  
Shortshift's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 149
Likes: 1
From: So. Cal. USA
OMG Hohn, thats killin me!! lol Yeah.. almost bought a set of those and said.... hmmmm 300 bucks vs 600.. But the real reason was because the 275's have this long history of being a good fuel mileage injector so went with those to get a baseline of what the truck will do first.. Now I know.. Not a whole lot better then the ol DD3's actually.. Think Im gonna have to spring for some 1's and call it good.

But see there's the other strategy thats kinda keeping me thinking.. Hows about running just some 1.6's and NO electronics?? Would that be simple & sweet or what..
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 01:54 AM
  #12  
HOHN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 6
From: Cummins Technical Center, IN
I was floored by the 1.0s. Gary reported back to me that he got between 23 and 21mpg with them hand calc'd on a road trip from WY to SD and back.

His truck with just an EZ and M1s felt as strong SOP as mine with EZ and DD2s, but was much cleaner. You wouldn't believe the difference in smoke, and hot weather in 6000ft elevation is a brutal smoke test.

jh
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 07:40 AM
  #13  
iker42's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 2
From: Christiana,Pa
i think for now i will get the 275s from a member here, then mach 1's in the future
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 06:16 PM
  #14  
Shortshift's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 149
Likes: 1
From: So. Cal. USA
Just ordered a set of Mach 1s. Will report back on the differences between them and the 275s when known. Thanks for the input. From speaking with a couple people, the M1s can actually net better mileage than the 275s because they are so efficient burning.

We will see.. : )
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 06:31 PM
  #15  
Fishin2Deep4U's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
From: The Great Northwest!
Originally Posted by HOHN
I was floored by the 1.0s. Gary reported back to me that he got between 23 and 21mpg with them hand calc'd on a road trip from WY to SD and back.

His truck with just an EZ and M1s felt as strong SOP as mine with EZ and DD2s, but was much cleaner. You wouldn't believe the difference in smoke, and hot weather in 6000ft elevation is a brutal smoke test.

jh

My M6's net 23mpg on the hiway. 20-20.5 towing my sled at 70mph!

Dave
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:29 PM.