Other Everything else not covered in the main topics goes here. Please avoid brand and flame wars. Don't try and up your post count. It won't work in here.
View Poll Results: Will Chrysler ultimately be found worthy or worthless?
Worthy
23
44.23%
Worthless
29
55.77%
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll

Worthy or Worthless?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 08:13 PM
  #1  
Country23047's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 125
Likes: 1
From: Charles City, Va.
Worthy or Worthless?

Do you think the US Gov't, Fiat, France and consumers will ultimately find our efficient, powerful, accident resistant and diesel powered trucks worthy or worthless?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 09:33 PM
  #2  
Swarthy Dago's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 470
Likes: 1
well lets see, u.s. government = liberal panzies, france = liberal panzies, i would say they will say worthy but wasteful and maybe even dirty, which will result in worthless by their liberal standards.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 08:05 AM
  #3  
Foxborough's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 808
Likes: 1
From: Rockford, Illinois
The government can't manage anything efficiently. Just to name a few, post office, VA hospitals, DMV, social security, medicare, and the IRS. Just keep in mind 30 or 40 years ago Amtrack was loosing money and the government stepped in to help. Now Amtrack only needs 50% of government money (our taxes) to keep afloat. In 20 more years or so they might work it's way to 49% extra funding . Amtrack now is what GM & Chrysler will be in the future . I am still in shock how the bond holders got 0.29 cents on the dollar and the UAW get a pretty sweet deal on ownership. Sure was a good idea to give all the billions to the auto companies to prevent a bankruptcy. Who came up with the idea to throw $ at the auto companies.......ah yes the government .
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 09:40 AM
  #4  
Grit Dog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 2
From: Auburn, WA
Chrysler isn't too thrifty with their money either.
Just thinking last night when I saw 3 - 2010 Ram test mules driving through the mountains, pulling their special trailers, why do they spend all the $ on this when they could get it done for free?
Ok they're paying a guy (2 guys in 2 of the trucks) wages, living out expenses, fuel for the truck, cost of the trailer to test out a new platform, which I believe is just new sheetmetal and interior.
At the same time, I passed at least 1/2 dozen hot shot drivers pulling loads with 1 tons.
Why doesn't Chrysler look up a few of these guys and give them the truck to pull their loads with to test the trucks? I mean it's not like they have the design engineer doing the test driving (do they?). Probably some flunky who is on light duty from the assembly line doing the test driving.
I'm sure there's any number of hot shot drivers that would take a free truck for a period of time for testing and be more than willing to follow some basic rules laid down by Chrysler to make them effective tests.
Oh and ***?, all 3 trucks were duallys, 1 was a C&C and they were pulling EMPTY trailers.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 10:13 AM
  #5  
Lary Ellis (Top)'s Avatar
Admin Team Leader
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,514
Likes: 207
Originally Posted by Grit Dog
Chrysler isn't too thrifty with their money either.
Just thinking last night when I saw 3 - 2010 Ram test mules driving through the mountains, pulling their special trailers, why do they spend all the $ on this when they could get it done for free?
Ok they're paying a guy (2 guys in 2 of the trucks) wages, living out expenses, fuel for the truck, cost of the trailer to test out a new platform, which I believe is just new sheetmetal and interior.
At the same time, I passed at least 1/2 dozen hot shot drivers pulling loads with 1 tons.
Why doesn't Chrysler look up a few of these guys and give them the truck to pull their loads with to test the trucks? I mean it's not like they have the design engineer doing the test driving (do they?). Probably some flunky who is on light duty from the assembly line doing the test driving.
I'm sure there's any number of hot shot drivers that would take a free truck for a period of time for testing and be more than willing to follow some basic rules laid down by Chrysler to make them effective tests.
Oh and ***?, all 3 trucks were duallys, 1 was a C&C and they were pulling EMPTY trailers.
The test vehicles are fitted with lots of test sensors and monitored full time, I doubt a hot shotter would have the time or inclination to want to watch the computer screens all day and record the findings.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 10:18 AM
  #6  
cincydiesel's Avatar
Muted one day, Banned the next....... Ah the life of a DTR 1%'er
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,187
Likes: 0
From: Ohio: Home of the disappointing sports teams
Originally Posted by Lary Ellis (Top)
The test vehicles are fitted with lots of test sensors and monitored full time, I doubt a hot shotter would have the time or inclination to want to watch the computer screens all day and record the findings.
Wouldn't the computer keep track of those record findings? I would think the driver could just monitor the road and let the computers watch the data?
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 03:45 PM
  #7  
Iron Mike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Southern Illinois
Originally Posted by Country23047
Do you think the US Gov't, Fiat, France and consumers will ultimately find our efficient, powerful, accident resistant and diesel powered trucks worthy or worthless?
Whats France got to do with it? Fiat is an Italian company.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crossy
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
3
Apr 1, 2022 02:28 AM
jimbo486
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
19
Mar 26, 2012 01:09 AM
getblown5.9
Other
5
Mar 1, 2007 09:00 AM
Ridiculous
General Diesel Discussion
22
Mar 5, 2006 07:54 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 AM.