Other Everything else not covered in the main topics goes here. Please avoid brand and flame wars. Don't try and up your post count. It won't work in here.

Now THIS is fast ....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2004 | 03:40 PM
  #16  
Mexstan's Avatar
Thread Starter
It's my pot and I'll stir it if I want to. If you're not careful, I'll stir your's as well!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,264
Likes: 209
From: Central Mexico.
Originally posted by BigBlue
Thanks Mexstan. You just killed my day.
You are welcome. Glad I could help.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2004 | 03:51 PM
  #17  
mra35's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Westminster, CO
There is no way this guy was going over 200 mph. Take a look at the top factory superbikes that run in AMA. Even with the factory unobtainum parts that say Duhamel runs he has yet to break 200 even at Daytona. I highly doubt some street squid could do this. Oh and anyone speeding even close to 200 on the street deserves to be called a squid.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2004 | 04:38 PM
  #18  
justinp20012500's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Thats pretty good!!

I was blasting down I 80 on my 2001 R6. About 156-160. I saw a highway patrol car on top of an overpass and I backed out of it. He clocked me at 132. After the usual "What the heck are you thinking" talk he gave me a ticket and sent me on my way. I went and saw the judge and he let me off with 6 months probabtion. It only cost me 60 bucks. Its not on my record either.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2004 | 05:40 PM
  #19  
BigBlue's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
mra35, I remember a couple of years back, the bike companies got together and decided that they will limit their bikes to 190mph top speeds. Apparently, there were inexperienced people buying this high horse power bikes and killing themselves cause of excessive speed. I have no doubt that these bikes with a little computer tune could run well over 200mph.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2004 | 05:48 PM
  #20  
Lsufan78's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
From: Ball, Louisiana
Originally posted by Mexstan
Chrisreyn, your calcs reminded me of the following:


SANTA CLAUS: An Engineer's Perspective

I. There are approximately two billion children (persons under 18) in the world. However, since Santa does not visit children of Muslim, Hindu, Jewish or Buddhist religions, this reduces the workload for Christmas night to 15% of the total, or 378 million (according to the Population Reference Bureau). At an average (census) rate of 3.5 children per house hold, that comes to 108 million homes, presuming that there is at least one good child in each.

II. Santa has about 31 hours of Christmas to work with, thanks to the different time zones and the rotation of the earth, assuming he travels east to west (which seems logical). This works out to 967.7 visits per second.

This is to say that for each Christian household with a good child, Santa has around 1/1000th of a second to park the sleigh, hop out, jump down the chimney, fill the stockings, distribute the remaining presents under the tree, eat whatever snacks have been left for him, get back up the chimney, jump into the sleigh and get on to the next house. Assuming that each of these 108 million stops is evenly distributed around the earth (which, of course, we know to be false, but will accept for the purposes of our calculations), we are now talking about 0.78 miles per household; a total trip of 75.5 million miles, not counting bathroom stops or breaks. This means Santa's sleigh is moving at 650 miles per second --- 3,000 times the speed of sound. For purposes of comparison, the fastest man-made vehicle, the Ulysses space probe, moves at a poky 27.4 miles per second, and a conventional reindeer can run (at best) 15 miles per hour.

III. The payload of the sleigh adds another interesting element. Assuming that each child gets nothing more than a medium sized Lego set (two pounds), the sleigh is carrying over 500 thousand tons, not counting Santa himself. On land, a conventional reindeer can pull no more than 300 pounds. Even granting that the "flying" reindeer could pull ten times the normal amount, the job can't be done with eight or even nine of them --- Santa would need 360,000 of them. This increases the payload, not counting the weight of the sleigh, another 54,000 tons, or roughly seven times the weight of the Queen Elizabeth (the ship, not the monarch).

IV. 600,000 tons traveling at 650 miles per second crates enormous air resistance --- this would heat up the reindeer in the same fashion as a spacecraft re-entering the earth's atmosphere. The lead pair of reindeer would absorb 14.3 quintillion joules of energy per second each. In short, they would burst into flames almost instantaneously, exposing the reindeer behind them and creating deafening sonic booms in their wake. The entire reindeer team would be vaporized within 4.26 thousandths of a second, or right about the time Santa reached the fifth house on his trip. Not that it matters, however, since Santa, as a result of accelerating from a dead stop 650 m.p.s. in .001 seconds, would be subjected to centrifugal forces of 17,500 g's. A 250 pound Santa (which seems ludicrously slim) would be pinned to the back of the sleigh by 4,315,015 pounds of force, instantly crushing his bones and organs and reducing him to a quivering blob of pink goo.

V. Therefore, if Santa did exist, he's dead now.

sooo...what are you trying to say???
later, dustin
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2004 | 06:23 PM
  #21  
scottrod's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: Big Sky Country
A guy in town named Hank Booth has a turbocharged Hyabusa. They ran it at the salt flats and it set a couple records. It ran 233.687 mph- he drives it all the time in the summer.
200 is more than attainable- it just isn't cheap.

Who woulda thunk a full sized Dodge pickup would run in the 10's with a diesel???
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2004 | 06:31 PM
  #22  
Hemi Dart's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Here's a link w/ more info:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0922042speed1.html
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 09:49 AM
  #23  
BigBlue's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
I second the turboed hybusa thing. Saw a guy drive one to the track, run low 7's with it, and drive home with it. Talk about a ride. What's the point in having something that fast. Who are you gonna race besides drag bikes? I like to win, but I also like competition. Oh well. I guess you get the privilage of saying I own a 7 second bike.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jim Lane
Other
8
Dec 7, 2015 09:16 PM
Shorts
Other
115
Jun 29, 2013 09:23 PM
95ram
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
15
Jul 28, 2010 02:17 PM
EdmontonCanada
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
37
Dec 9, 2009 03:18 AM
trik396
Other
12
Mar 14, 2007 07:57 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 PM.