Damper, Dampener, Dampner
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 6
From: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Re: Re: Damper, Dampener, Dampner
Originally posted by Hemi Cat
Are you talking about the "Harmonic Balancer"???
It is located on the front of the crankshaft and is engineered to balance out the torsional twisting of the crankshaft while running throughout the designed speed range of the motor. The torsionals are referred to as the harmonics of a specific crankshaft and need a "harmonic balancer".
Are you talking about the "Harmonic Balancer"???
It is located on the front of the crankshaft and is engineered to balance out the torsional twisting of the crankshaft while running throughout the designed speed range of the motor. The torsionals are referred to as the harmonics of a specific crankshaft and need a "harmonic balancer".
But on a typical internally balanced engine, this device does NOT balance anything. You are correct that it is there because of crankshaft twisting, but this is to DAMPEN the vibrations, not "balance" them. The only way to "balance" these vibrations would be to have identical harmonics induced that were 180° out of phase and create destructive interference between the two waves.
This is why "balance shafts" are used on some VEE configuration engines. Because a vee is inherently out of balance, the balance shaft is the only way to counteract this effect by doing just as I described above- generating a force equal and opposite to cancel out the primary force.
That said, there's a reason why there are trade names out there like "Fluidampr" (sic) not, "fluidbalancer".
Submitted for your consideration.
jlh
Re: Re: Re: Damper, Dampener, Dampner
Originally posted by HOHN
...but this is to DAMPEN the vibrations, not "balance" them.
jlh
...but this is to DAMPEN the vibrations, not "balance" them.
jlh
Re: Re: Re: Damper, Dampener, Dampner
Originally posted by HOHN
This is why "balance shafts" are used on some VEE configuration engines. Because a vee is inherently out of balance....
This is why "balance shafts" are used on some VEE configuration engines. Because a vee is inherently out of balance....
Well, actually, 60 degree V-8s (such as the Yamaha-built engine in the last Taurus SHOs) and 90 degree V-6s (all of the V-6s made by lobbing off 2 cylinders) that use split crankpins for an even firing order are inherently unbalanced and need balance shafts. 90 degree V-8s and 60 degree V-6s are fine.
Rusty
Then theres this one...
Pound feet of torque or foot pounds of torque.
I hear this stated in both ways often.
Which one is it?
just like guage and gage and gauge
Notice on the Rams its gage?
Then theres the southern folks bellering HEY?!
and us Canucks saying EH!?
Thats aight. Weez yall know wut it means. ah
LOL
Pound feet of torque or foot pounds of torque.
I hear this stated in both ways often.
Which one is it?
just like guage and gage and gauge
Notice on the Rams its gage?
Then theres the southern folks bellering HEY?!
and us Canucks saying EH!?
Thats aight. Weez yall know wut it means. ah
LOL
Originally posted by wannadiesel
You're just trying to get everybody riled up, Hoss. Aren't you the one who gets uppity about magazines, clips, and chargers?
You're just trying to get everybody riled up, Hoss. Aren't you the one who gets uppity about magazines, clips, and chargers?

But still, doesn't Ford own Cummins? I thought I read it here:
www.fordownscummins.com
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 6
From: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Hehe... This is getting better with each post!
Thanks for the tech info Rusty. I was talking about the VEE engines being out of balance in the sense of forces acting in different directions, not just firing order dictated by vee angles. I've read that there are certain "ideal" vee angles for a given number of cylinders- 90° for 8 cyl, 60° for 6 cylinders. The idea is basically that # of cylinders times vee angle works out to 360° or a multiple of 360°.
But even a vee engine with the bobweights perfectly matched isn't perfectly balanced. With an inline engine or a boxer configuration, there's a yin for every yang, a zig for every zag. This is what I mean by "balanced".
A vee can't have this because the vee angle means that the forces are acting in different planes, and therefore, cannot cancel each other out.
If I'm mistaken, please educate me-- this is the kind of stuff I LOVE to learn about.
Justin
Thanks for the tech info Rusty. I was talking about the VEE engines being out of balance in the sense of forces acting in different directions, not just firing order dictated by vee angles. I've read that there are certain "ideal" vee angles for a given number of cylinders- 90° for 8 cyl, 60° for 6 cylinders. The idea is basically that # of cylinders times vee angle works out to 360° or a multiple of 360°.
But even a vee engine with the bobweights perfectly matched isn't perfectly balanced. With an inline engine or a boxer configuration, there's a yin for every yang, a zig for every zag. This is what I mean by "balanced".
A vee can't have this because the vee angle means that the forces are acting in different planes, and therefore, cannot cancel each other out.
If I'm mistaken, please educate me-- this is the kind of stuff I LOVE to learn about.
Justin


