General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.

Most economical pickup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2013, 10:44 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
samboats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nashville. TN
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most economical pickup

If a person (me) started from scratch and the goal was to have the ultimate pickup for economy, what year and configuration would be the best?
Also, what would be the most cost effective mods to do to enhance mileage?
This would assume driving for economy and occasionally pulling 5 to 7 thousand pounds.
Old 02-26-2013, 12:39 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Busboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: On the Farm, Manitoba
Posts: 3,901
Received 36 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by samboats
If a person (me) started from scratch and the goal was to have the ultimate pickup for economy, what year and configuration would be the best?
Also, what would be the most cost effective mods to do to enhance mileage?
This would assume driving for economy and occasionally pulling 5 to 7 thousand pounds.
2002 SRW 2500 2X4 manual 5 spd. 3.54/5? gears. All synthetic oils including power steering fluid. Stock engine and stock filter box with Amsoil air filter. Fuel pressure, boost and EGT gauges.
Old 02-26-2013, 01:33 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
samboats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nashville. TN
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Thanks for the reply Busboy. What makes the 02 a best choice?
I actually wasn't expecting that year to be a top contender.
Old 02-26-2013, 01:44 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
SOhappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Udaho
Posts: 2,276
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Check this out http://www.dieselpowermag.com/tech/g...s/viewall.html
Old 02-26-2013, 04:17 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Busboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: On the Farm, Manitoba
Posts: 3,901
Received 36 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by samboats
Thanks for the reply Busboy. What makes the 02 a best choice?
I actually wasn't expecting that year to be a top contender.
It still has mechanical injectors along with a VP but if you monitor things you should be ok hence the gauges and because the VP is electric you could use a programmer of some kind on a fuel saver mode. It seems the later common rail injectors are quite fussy about how clean the fuel is and are expensive to replace. 2001.5 was the change to rear disc brakes so 2002 has 4 wheel discs which I think when towing is helpful. The manual trans would have the Dana 80 as opposed to the auto with the Dana 70. The 5.9L with no pollution should easily get over 20 MPG, my 2001 5 spd quad cab 4X4 got 20.5 mpg driven hard and fast on a lot of gravel roads. I know our 2011's 6.7 auto and manual were awful before deletes and it was a chore just to keep the manual running without check engine light on. Just my opinion, I would like to hear more.

Of course you could fold in the mirrors and tape over the wheels like in the link SOhappy provided. I did get a chuckle though.
Old 02-26-2013, 05:47 PM
  #6  
Administrator
 
patdaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Streator Illinois
Posts: 8,372
Received 171 Likes on 129 Posts
I would say find yourself a 94-97 2500 single cab 2X4 5 speed with 3.54 gears, keep it as low as possible, and swap in a 4BT......
Old 02-26-2013, 09:22 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
NE frmhnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: McCook, Nebraska
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
If I was after fuel mileage only I'd swap a first-gen motor and 3.07s into a second-gen half ton with 47RH and gear vendors.
Old 02-26-2013, 09:48 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
gorms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SE Mass
Posts: 1,497
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
I got just under 24 mpg on a trip back and forth to Maine (about 450mi round trip) just going about 60mph the whole way there and back. Thats rolling around 7k lbs without all that duct tape on the wheels/grill and the mirrors folded out! That was about 5 years ago, haven't beaten 22 since then.

So I'm with patdaly. I've heard good numbers from 03-05 CR's as well.
Old 02-27-2013, 07:58 AM
  #9  
Administrator
 
patdaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Streator Illinois
Posts: 8,372
Received 171 Likes on 129 Posts
It is unfortunate that they didn't have 2 choices from the factory, because the 4BT will actually shock you with what it will pull. Would it be adequate for a big gooseneck? nah, at least not without turning it way up, but for say a 7K typical homeowner load?

Plenty.........and upper 20's would be very easy to do day in and day out.
Old 02-27-2013, 09:47 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
SIXSLUG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pacific NW, B'ham, Kalispell MT
Posts: 5,553
Received 148 Likes on 127 Posts
Mid 80's Toyota 1-ton diesel.....

Hard to find but probably could expect close to 40 mpg.

Only came in longbed 2wd,

Where you asking in general or refering to Dodge trucks only?
Old 02-27-2013, 11:44 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Busboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: On the Farm, Manitoba
Posts: 3,901
Received 36 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by patdaly
the 4BT will actually shock you with what it will pull. Would it be adequate for a big gooseneck? nah, at least not without turning it way up, but for say a 7K typical homeowner load?
Years back I was working the evening shift when two storms came together, it looked really menacing and tornado warnings were issued along with large hail. I was working on a 727 in one of the 4 slots of the widebody hangar and because it was hot we had the doors open. The wind picked up so I decided to fill up the hangar to minimize damage to the aircraft. I sent guys to get another 2 727's with the only two tractors we had there while I grabbed a baggage tractor with a 4BT. As it was not approved to move aircraft with I decided I should drive. We hooked a DC9-32 and started to drag it inside, it was slightly up hill and as it started to rain the tires started to lose traction so guys jumped onto the tractor to add weight and we slowly pulled it inside and closed the doors. DC9-32 is 110,000 lbs gross so not sure how much weight was there as I didn't know how much fuel was on board. Tough little engine.
Old 03-01-2013, 03:38 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
nolafishr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For Diesel Economy - Volkswagen TDI
Old 03-01-2013, 06:40 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
infidel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 14,672
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by SIXSLUG
Mid 80's Toyota 1-ton diesel.....

Hard to find but probably could expect close to 40 mpg.

Only came in longbed 2wd,

Where you asking in general or referring to Dodge trucks only?
I had one with a flatbed, was a very economical, but beat the hell out of you driving around empty.
Sort of wish I hadn't of sold it.
Old 03-01-2013, 08:44 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
olddodgetrucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
busboy a toyoto can pull a space suttle
Old 03-01-2013, 10:08 PM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
samboats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nashville. TN
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Thanks everyone for the input. I was hoping someone would recommend one of the pickups I have in my signature block or whatever it's called. I was considering either one of them or maybe a 2nd generation. Or, maybe a 2013 with all the emissions stuff taken off. Then I could pull my 14000 lb backhoe with the 6000 lb trailer. At any rate I would have to have a 6 cyl. Cummins.
Is that straight thinking or just wishful thinking?


Quick Reply: Most economical pickup



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 PM.