General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.

kodiak over dodge dually?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2007, 09:56 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ramblinNrollin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: houston
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
kodiak over dodge dually?

let me just start by saying i love well used to love my 06' dodge 4x4 dually... (if yall have time read and reply to my emergency post and it will explain what happened to my06' better detail) i have been pulling with this truck for a yr now and have loved it... however i am in the truck market as of recently and am considering switching from dodge to the chevy 4500 kodiak...i saw one at the dealer and i gotta say if u spend some time behind the wheel this thing is like driving a caddy.... i used to say that fords king ranch was one nice interior but his thing had every option known to man....im sure yall have seen them... i have heard a few reliablity issues with the new cummins but i just cant get over how nice it would be to have the kodiak.. i could use the extra load capacity as well..do yall think the kodiak would hold up like my good ol bulletproof dodge did? or should i save money and go with the new 5500 dodge is coming out with... i just cant help but think it wont be nearly as comfortable and have half the extras.. any advice on the kodiak would be appreciated as well as my my post on the emergency forum as well thanks
Old 07-23-2007, 06:58 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
RAMRODD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dakotas
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I don't know what was different about the Kodiak that you drove, but I rode in one last fall and It only had like 4000 miles and that was the worst riding truck I have ever been in. 1 step above walking in my opinion They must have different suspension options or something.
Old 07-23-2007, 08:59 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
BMH95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: IL
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go get the little Freightliner truck.
Old 07-23-2007, 10:36 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Luke S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What kind of 4500 were you driving? I am a Dodge and a Chevy dealer and sell both type of trucks you are talking about. I have also owned and towed with both. I wouldn't take another 4500 Kodiak if they paid me to take it! First off fuel mileage is horrible. I would get about 5-6 mpg towing a 10-15k load. The ride was the worst thing I have ever experienced. After about 30k miles the interior trim in the 4500's basically starts falling out as it gets beat to pieces and just becomes a rattle trap. I just traded in an 05' 4500 crew cab 4x4 from a customer that had two of them. He had always ran Dodges and got the idea he needed bigger trucks. So he bought a pair of em and after one year traded one back on a Dodge 1-ton pick-up and after another year traded the other back on a new Dodge cab & chassis. He says the new cab & chassis rides like a car compared to the 4500, gets twice the fuel mileage doing the same job, and has a lot more useable power. Please take my advice and STAY AWAY!!!!!!
Old 07-23-2007, 02:10 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Jeff in TD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,519
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
There have been a couple of them traded in for Dodges at the local dealership. These were pretty spartian, and I think rode rough.

I think there are outfits that uprate the interior and put air suspension on them, which might make them a little better.

If you had the $$$ though, I think I'd look at an M2 Freightliner, unless you absolutely had to have 4x4...
Old 07-25-2007, 06:38 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
rip 112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LaGrange, Texas
Posts: 4,813
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
What about that international truck? It seems capable. Its like a little big truck!!!lol
Old 07-25-2007, 06:44 PM
  #7  
Muted User
 
LOGAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SOUTHCENTRAL OHIO
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
remember those trucks are beam axle/leaf sprung and weighs alot more than the regular trucks, even the F450 and 4500 dodge.
Old 07-25-2007, 07:53 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
hamilton71801's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: L.A. (Lower Arkansas)
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Luke S
What kind of 4500 were you driving? I am a Dodge and a Chevy dealer and sell both type of trucks you are talking about. I have also owned and towed with both. I wouldn't take another 4500 Kodiak if they paid me to take it! First off fuel mileage is horrible. I would get about 5-6 mpg towing a 10-15k load. The ride was the worst thing I have ever experienced. After about 30k miles the interior trim in the 4500's basically starts falling out as it gets beat to pieces and just becomes a rattle trap. I just traded in an 05' 4500 crew cab 4x4 from a customer that had two of them. He had always ran Dodges and got the idea he needed bigger trucks. So he bought a pair of em and after one year traded one back on a Dodge 1-ton pick-up and after another year traded the other back on a new Dodge cab & chassis. He says the new cab & chassis rides like a car compared to the 4500, gets twice the fuel mileage doing the same job, and has a lot more useable power. Please take my advice and STAY AWAY!!!!!!

I've never rode in one but here's some very good advice from Luke who has some great personal experience with both. I'd take his advice and stay away.
Old 07-25-2007, 09:35 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
C Schomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pueblo West
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I rode in a Binder with a DT466 and it wasn't anything to rave about and it was gutless as could be. I've never seen any mods for IHC and I don't think they can take very much anyway. From what I've read, most DT530s are only 275hp and no oil cooled pistons. Their tq. is also low. It looks like a decent 5.9 would outdo a DT530. I'd much rather have a C8.3! Craig
Old 07-26-2007, 08:18 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Luke S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by C Schomer
I rode in a Binder with a DT466 and it wasn't anything to rave about and it was gutless as could be. I've never seen any mods for IHC and I don't think they can take very much anyway. From what I've read, most DT530s are only 275hp and no oil cooled pistons. Their tq. is also low. It looks like a decent 5.9 would outdo a DT530. I'd much rather have a C8.3! Craig
Must have been one of the lower HP rated DT466's. I have run several over the years and even the 230hp version feels stronger than a 300hp 5.9, mainly cause the torque is way up there and they are a lugging motor. A 530 on the other hand would whip two 5.9's put together. That is a good medium duty truck and light single axle tractor engine. I am a Cummins fan tried and true, but in a medium duty truck I'd take a DT466 or 530 over a 5.9 any day of the week.
Old 07-26-2007, 08:45 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
jrsmokestacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Elk Grove Village, IL
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd also choose a 466 over any other engine. Once you work on one you'll never look at another MD the same way. Can do a complete rebuild in frame. As far as the kodiac's I've seen 3 personally that have had engine faliure with the d-max(all under 100K mi.)
Old 07-26-2007, 10:09 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
mr T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX, Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ramblinNrollin
let me just start by saying i love well used to love my 06' dodge 4x4 dually... (if yall have time read and reply to my emergency post and it will explain what happened to my06' better detail) i have been pulling with this truck for a yr now and have loved it... however i am in the truck market as of recently and am considering switching from dodge to the chevy 4500 kodiak...i saw one at the dealer and i gotta say if u spend some time behind the wheel this thing is like driving a caddy.... i used to say that fords king ranch was one nice interior but his thing had every option known to man....im sure yall have seen them... i have heard a few reliablity issues with the new cummins but i just cant get over how nice it would be to have the kodiak.. i could use the extra load capacity as well..do yall think the kodiak would hold up like my good ol bulletproof dodge did? or should i save money and go with the new 5500 dodge is coming out with... i just cant help but think it wont be nearly as comfortable and have half the extras.. any advice on the kodiak would be appreciated as well as my my post on the emergency forum as well thanks
I htink they are completely different trucks...you can use the dodge as a daily driver, take it anywhere and get decent mileage. The Kodiak is only useful if you want to be legal and stable when towing a really heavy load...otherwise i think they are butt ugly and don't they have a duramax?...might as well get a 1 ton chev with the duramax
Old 07-26-2007, 10:37 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
doomgaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, OH
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I sell Freightliner Sportchassis trucks and International Western Haulers. I will tell you that the Kodiak 4500s are VERY easy to sell against... all they have to do is ride in one!

Like others have said, it is the worst riding truck I've ever been in. Same engine and transmission as a one ton so you can't says you're getting any more power either.
Old 07-26-2007, 12:12 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
graphitecumnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jrsmokestacks
As far as the kodiac's I've seen 3 personally that have had engine faliure with the d-max(all under 100K mi.)
I only know one Kodiak owner and that one owner has had nothing but trouble with the truck... injector issues galore with his D-max.... as soon as the warranty period is up on it, he'll be purchasing a Ram 4500/5500.

fwiw, I don't think all of the Kodiak's are POS's... just the one I personally know the owner of .
Old 07-26-2007, 05:52 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
96_12V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Northern Iowa
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Understand the ratings...

Originally Posted by C Schomer
I rode in a Binder with a DT466 and it wasn't anything to rave about and it was gutless as could be. I've never seen any mods for IHC and I don't think they can take very much anyway. From what I've read, most DT530s are only 275hp and no oil cooled pistons. Their tq. is also low. It looks like a decent 5.9 would outdo a DT530. I'd much rather have a C8.3! Craig

The DT 530 E is a hard-pull true medium-duty engine, and at the upper end of the medium duty range. If you look at the actual plate on the engine of a 275 hp unit, it's likely rated between 1100 - 1300 lb-ft of torque, depending upon the calibration the ECM is programmed with. They are not, in any manner, intended as a "rapid acceleration" engine.

The DT 466 E is quite similar, indeed externally on the production line it's nearly impossible to tell the two apart without looking at the engine plate. Typically the 466's are 190 - 250 bhp, 650 - 1000 lb-ft of torque.

With either of these true medium duty engines, it must be remembered these ratings are NOT peak horsepower & torque. Instead, they are rated to operate at the specified torque & horsepower all day, every day, for the life cycle of the engine. Application specific needs dictate different ratings, and with weight being less of an object in a medium duty truck, an 1800 lb engine is not a problem. It's a little more than a pickup truck would like.


Quick Reply: kodiak over dodge dually?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 AM.