General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

FASS filtration deception.

Old Feb 13, 2011 | 10:49 AM
  #121  
hoot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 745
Likes: 2
From: SE PA
Originally Posted by AH64ID
Didn't really think it was

How are you plumbed now? Probably no kit, but not hard to do.
Plumbed with what came with the FASS. If I remember there is a blue fuel line that is provided with the FASS kit. Part of it is used from the FASS to the fuel tank fitting that is on the sender column. I'm sure the upgrade is a bigger straw?

This looks like the answer...

http://www.vulcanperformance.com/Dra...shlo-p/dsi.htm
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2011 | 11:06 AM
  #122  
AH64ID's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,737
Likes: 4
From: Kuna, Idaho
If the setup you have is just attaching to the doorman fitting on the OE canister then that's probably the issue. The hole is smaller than 3/8".

I gather its not too difficult to get rid of the doorman fitting for a 1/2" fitting like on that link, but you don't use the draw-straw you use the OE pickup still so you don't have any 1/4 tank issues.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2011 | 11:08 AM
  #123  
hoot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 745
Likes: 2
From: SE PA
Why is there a 1/4 tank issue with the draw straw?

Vulcan says.. "makes for a super clean and secure installation and brings all the return fuel back into the module for replenishment during low fuel situations."
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2011 | 11:20 AM
  #124  
bnold's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,184
Likes: 0
From: Dallas area
I had 1/4 tank issues with the draw straw. Install went perfect and everything was great for a while.

Pulling a heavy trailer out of pasture and I bottomed the tank just slightly on a little hill, must have dented the tank just slightly or something but pressures would drop below 1/4 tank when accelerating or slowing down.

Fix for me... Hellman sump, 110% fixed all my problems, great pressure down to the last gallon of fuel.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2011 | 11:24 AM
  #125  
hoot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 745
Likes: 2
From: SE PA
Originally Posted by bnold
I had 1/4 tank issues with the draw straw. Install went perfect and everything was great for a while.

Pulling a heavy trailer out of pasture and I bottomed the tank just slightly on a little hill, must have dented the tank just slightly or something but pressures would drop below 1/4 tank when accelerating or slowing down.

Fix for me... Hellman sump, 110% fixed all my problems, great pressure down to the last gallon of fuel.
For some reason Vulcan states there is no 1/4 tank issue...

http://www.dieselbombers.com/5-9l-24...tml#post323627
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2011 | 11:41 AM
  #126  
hoot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 745
Likes: 2
From: SE PA
Thanks bnold,

Looks like the end all option. I actually see drastic pressure drops at low tank levels with the stock tank components.

Reply
Old Feb 13, 2011 | 12:11 PM
  #127  
bnold's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,184
Likes: 0
From: Dallas area
Took me about 2 hrs to drain tank (using fass pump into containers) drop tank, clean, areas, drill holes, install the hellman, and get it all back together. One of the best fuel system mods I have done. Supports my 220GPH FASS without issue... Now I just wished it separated water.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2011 | 12:13 PM
  #128  
hoot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 745
Likes: 2
From: SE PA
If I go with the sump I'll go back to the better water separator options and see if it still is an issue. Might even be a good idea to have a drain on that sump.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2011 | 01:51 PM
  #129  
ghenges's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Observing all the signatures here over the years one became jealous of those with those top of the line kilobuck FASS filters.

Now it becomes known FASS actually KNEW their filter system was not as advertised.
Furthermore no ASTM SAE standardized testing was ever performed on the FASS system.

It doesn't matter now if users turn away because FASS has stuffed their mattress with bookoo cash and have learned how to market an unproven widget on the internet. As PT Barnum said there's a sucker born every minute, the internet has provided the vehicle to connect to every sucker in the world in microseconds. A bad product can go viral which implies confidence and legitimization because "so many people can't be wrong", bubbles are made of such.

My thoughts turn to Amsoil which never shows comparison test results to their real competition.
Amsoil tests good against common Valvoline 10w-30 and the like, BUT
why doesn't Amsoil comparison test against Lubrication Engineers, Shaeffers and Cenpeco?

What do Amsoil, Amway, Avon, Fuller Brush and Tupperware have in common?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2011 | 02:18 PM
  #130  
trik396's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 1
From: NW Indiana
Originally Posted by ghenges
Observing all the signatures here over the years one became jealous of those with those top of the line kilobuck FASS filters.

Now it becomes known FASS actually KNEW their filter system was not as advertised.
Furthermore no ASTM SAE standardized testing was ever performed on the FASS system.

It doesn't matter now if users turn away because FASS has stuffed their mattress with bookoo cash and have learned how to market an unproven widget on the internet. As PT Barnum said there's a sucker born every minute, the internet has provided the vehicle to connect to every sucker in the world in microseconds. A bad product can go viral which implies confidence and legitimization because "so many people can't be wrong", bubbles are made of such.

My thoughts turn to Amsoil which never shows comparison test results to their real competition.
Amsoil tests good against common Valvoline 10w-30 and the like, BUT
why doesn't Amsoil comparison test against Lubrication Engineers, Shaeffers and Cenpeco?

What do Amsoil, Amway, Avon, Fuller Brush and Tupperware have in common?
Multi Level Marketing...
I was NEVER a fan of Fass... never understood why one would pay SO much cash for a big, inefficient, noisy pump...?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2011 | 02:47 PM
  #131  
hoot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 745
Likes: 2
From: SE PA
Yep.... they got me. It is a bit embarrassing. I should have known..... I used to sell Electrolux vacuums way back when to make a few extra bucks. It's all in the presentation.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2011 | 07:52 PM
  #132  
GIT-R-DONE's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 885
Likes: 3
From: Western PA
Originally Posted by hoot
Yep.... they got me. It is a bit embarrassing. I should have known..... I used to sell Electrolux vacuums way back when to make a few extra bucks. It's all in the presentation.
Been there, done that, aint going back to it !

Dont fret Hoot, your not the only one that got suckered.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2011 | 03:17 PM
  #133  
Diesel-Dan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,534
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by hoot
Well here goes.

Since I noticed fuel starvation more than ever, I felt something was wrong. I also noticed she didn't make as much smoke. Hard acceleration gave me the "pop" of fuel starvation. Rarely had that before under the current Smarty and TST settings. The only things that changed in the last 10,000 miles is it turned winter and cold and I switched from the stock FASS WS1001 to the BF1212.

I was thinking the winter fuel and the cold was contributing.

Yesterday I removed the BF1212 and installed a brand new WS1001.

Took it for a hard ride and low and behold, smoke and power is back to where it was before the BF1212. No more "pop" under hard acceleration.

I suppose there is not much we can do if your truck has the mods similar to mine, with the FASS pseudo water separator, since we cannot have a filter with more restriction at that location.

I have a fuel pressure gauge and I was not seeing a drop in pressure. Always around 17 psi. So no pressure drop at the FASS port but a definite performance drop. Not sure why.

Thank you Diesel-Dan.... Looks like you know what you are talking about.

To this day I still find it fascinating that the first generation Duramax trucks that used the same common rail hp pump is able to produce 400-500 hp while sucking fuel through a 3 micron Racor (my old truck) and there was NO LIFT PUMP AT ALL. The GM trucks used large dia. fuel lines from the tank to the HP pump. The only lift pump used is the internal gear rotor pump in the HP pump. We have the same internal lift pump in our Cummins. I guess the Dodge fuel feed system all out blows ..... way too restrictive. Must be from the tank though since we replace the whole fuel line from the FASS to the HP pump with the FASS supplied fuel line.

I could see a future where I run just a pump and an inline filter. For what the FASS is advertised as, I just don't see the justification. It's pump is more just to get fuel through itself than to be an enhancement to the engine.
I worked for FASS for 3 years (But no longer do) and saw this problem a lot when folks started running a 10um filter on the suction side of the pump instead of one FASS suggested.

My suggestion is to hook up your stock filter head and run with these air separation pumps if you feel uneasy about anything. The pressure line coming out of the pump is low flow....or only what the engine is using. So should be easy to keep up with for water removal. So you are not asking your stock filter to do much more work than what it normally did. Just my .02
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2011 | 05:04 PM
  #134  
John_P's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,311
Likes: 52
From: Holly Ridge, N.C.
Originally Posted by Diesel-Dan
I worked for FASS for 3 years (But no longer do) and saw this problem a lot when folks started running a 10um filter on the suction side of the pump instead of one FASS suggested.

My suggestion is to hook up your stock filter head and run with these air separation pumps if you feel uneasy about anything. The pressure line coming out of the pump is low flow....or only what the engine is using. So should be easy to keep up with for water removal. So you are not asking your stock filter to do much more work than what it normally did. Just my .02
------------
Dan:

Good to see you back on the website Sir! It sure has been a long time since we talked and I have missed you at many of the diesel rallies I attend.

You sure took good care of me while you were at FASS and I thank you for that! That 180 GPH pump you fixed for me is still working great Dan! That was almost four (4) years ago now!

I see a constant 40lbs of pressure under all conditions and have never had ANY issues with my FASS pump.

Take care Dan and I hope to see you at an event in 2011 Sir!

--------
John_P
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2011 | 02:32 PM
  #135  
Diesel-Dan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,534
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by John_P
------------
Dan:

Good to see you back on the website Sir! It sure has been a long time since we talked and I have missed you at many of the diesel rallies I attend.

You sure took good care of me while you were at FASS and I thank you for that! That 180 GPH pump you fixed for me is still working great Dan! That was almost four (4) years ago now!

I see a constant 40lbs of pressure under all conditions and have never had ANY issues with my FASS pump.

Take care Dan and I hope to see you at an event in 2011 Sir!

--------
John_P
John it has been a long time! But my job now (Working for the supply side of the diesel industry! At a facility that mfg's LSD still! ) keeps me busy! Fuel doesn't take a vacation! I'm going to try to poke my head back in here more......just getting over licking my wounds of the past few years.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 AM.