General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Diesel engine pet names...i.e..duramax??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 01:28 AM
  #16  
jeepsuck's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
From: socal
Perhaps the reason is the simple fact that Izusu and International actually make vehicles, not just engines. they wouldnt want anyone confused as to what they just saw go by. was it a chevy, or an izusu? Ford, or international?

besides, "Chevy Silverado Izusu Turbo Diesel" or "Ford F-350 International Turbo Diesel" just dont sound right.

not to mention people are stupid for words like: "Power" and "Max"

just gimme a CTD!
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 10:56 AM
  #17  
hubmonkey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Originally Posted by Fronty Owner
Better question is why Ford and GM didn't go with a Cat, Detroit, or Mack engine?
Cost and agreements with the current companies.

Look at it this way...

The **** on your radio costs, lets just say, 4 cents from your current supplier. There is a **** that is nicer and more astetically pleasing from another supplier. That nicer **** costs 6 cents. Now here is the fun part, multiply that times 500,000 vehicles. That is a $20,000 increase in your overall cost across the board which directly affects your bottom line. Now before anyone says "I am willing to pay the 2 cents to get that ****" keep this in mind. You have a contactual obligation to the current supplier of the 4 cent **** and you will have to pay them say $20,000 to get out of that contract. Now that makes your 2 cent increase to get the new **** a 4 cent increase over the entire product line. Which is passed to the consumer. Now apply this same principal for every single part, nut, bolt, molding, etc. on a truck.

Now, what makes anyone think that Ford and Chevy have not looked at CAT, Detroit, or Mack? I am sure they have explored those options and they have not been cost effective.

What would be involved with Ford discarding the current engine? Well Shipping logistics to get the motors to the assembly plant, retooling to install the engine, retraining and huge amount of Diesel techs at dealerships. All this without even considering the R&D costs. Who pays for that? You and I do.

Now I see alot of people bashing other brands like Ford and Chevy. Those people need to open their eyes and look in ther mirror because Dodge has it share of problems too. Just read the threads. People are way more likley to complain about something than praise it, it's human nature.There is an evolution process to every product offering. No one gets it right out of the gate. Two houses down from me is a guy who bought a 06 Duramax about the same time I bought my 05 Dodge. I talked with him about his truck and he loves it, I love the sound of it because it is quieter than my 05 with 6500 miles on it.


Sorry for the long rant but just had to add my opinion.

Hub
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 03:26 PM
  #18  
Hdmax's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: South Central Ohio
Originally Posted by dodgeguy71
Thank you G1625S.... Not meant to upset Duramax drivers...on a Dodge website.....just joking....don't get all fired up about it, just neighborly brand bashing. If ya want to here what I think about GM you have to visit the other site I frequent. This site is a toned back me on GM, just good ol' boy guys talking about whose is best! May you have thousands of miles of trouble free travel in your General Motors/ Isuzu truck and me with my DaimlerChrysler/Cummins truck!!
I'm not fired up about anything!
By the way; GM owns Dmax LTD. So it is not an Isuzu engine. Even though the engine is stamped Isuzu, GM has owned at least 49% (Now it`s more like 90%) of Dmax LTD from the beginning. And it was a joint venture.

I don't care what they name it, as long as it is trouble free for the time I own it! (Ricer even works for me! ) It`s built right here in Ohio, Owned by General Motors. The way I see it, It`s about as American as anything else we can buy these days. And the name doesn't bother me in the least!
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 03:31 PM
  #19  
1-2-3's Avatar
Just a plain ole guy
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,537
Likes: 11
From: Carlos, Texas
"Why can't a company the size of GM come up with a good diesel pickup truck engine on their own?"

They did many years ago when they tried to convert a 350 block to deisel. Can you say belly flop?
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 04:01 PM
  #20  
dodgeguy71's Avatar
Thread Starter
Chapter President
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
From: Near Mt. Pleasant, Tennessee
Wow, never thought this thread would stir up so many varied responses!! Good read about the .02 cents. That would be the bean counters! Like I said it was something that popped into my head, driving down the road listening to the engine out the passenger side window. Just a useless, dim light bulb question......everything has problems. Dodge, Chevy, Ford......Toyota, Honda.....just different problems.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 04:42 PM
  #21  
checkster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
From: jarrettsville, md
Hell id by a ford with a CAT motor just to put the CAT DIESEL POWER sticker on the windshield........LOL
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 04:45 PM
  #22  
northslope's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
How bout the Izusu NPR's that are gas powered that run 454's or 350's?? Wierd huh?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 05:11 PM
  #23  
Lrdchaos's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa OK
[QUOTE=charliez]"Why can't a company the size of GM come up with a good diesel pickup truck engine on their own?"

I guess your saying that DC came up with the Cummins Diesel to put in the rams? Everybody likes to talk smack on the dmax engines on this site, and while I understand that it is partly brand loyality I think that alot of it is unfounded. Dad has had a 02 dmax since it was new it has 114000 miles on it, and the only thing it had done to it was the injectors replaced at 105,000 miles(chevy paid the bill due to warranting them for 200k). I have yet to see DC step up and warranty their flawed fuel system on the 98.5-02 rams or the injector issue that the 04.5+ trucks are having. Whether people want to admit it or not the dmax is viable competition for the ol Cummins, and Gm will atleast back their motors if they know there is a problem.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 07:52 PM
  #24  
00Dog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by Begle1
I think that the V-8 Duramax is proving to be more than comfortable competition for the Cummins.

The Diesels in light trucks aren't exclusively for working; a lot of people want them to be driveable and have good top ends for daily driving. Very few people work their trucks more than half the time.

I would much rather have a V-8 Diesel, but it just so happens that the I-6 Cummins can out V-8 any V-8 available. Or, at least it was that way until the Duramax came out. The Duramax will probably never be a million-mile engine like the Cummins, but it has that real V-8 power and that good powerband.
I think the I-6 will out V-8 any V-8 because it is a superior configuration. It has better low end torque because of the long stroke and fewer parts than a V-8. My Cummins is very driveable but I will honestly say I've never driven a Ford or Chevy diesel (except for the old IDI 7.3 in a U-Haul). The old inline sixes (gas) in the Ford vans seem to outlast the gas V-8s . My friend has over 200k on his 4.9.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 09:36 PM
  #25  
PChouinard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 630
Likes: 1
From: Az
Ford PowerStroke sounds better than Ford FlowerStroke. That's the only reason. And why build your own when you can install the proven performance already available by Cummins? Same thing goes for Dana axles. Don't re-invent the wheel I say...
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 09:44 PM
  #26  
Fronty Owner's Avatar
'People of Wal-Mart' 2010 finalist
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma/Texas
along that lines of thinking, why innovate at all.
If the Dana axle is go, why try to design something else?
Bilstein isn't the only shock manufacturer
Nor Goodyear tires.

I think it was Henry Ford that felt the Model T was good enough so he didn't innovate until he had to.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 10:48 PM
  #27  
PChouinard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 630
Likes: 1
From: Az
What I'm saying is let the Cummins and the Dana guys do the innovating. Dodge needs to figure out how to keep a passenger power door lock working. Man I hate reaching across the cab.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 12:38 AM
  #28  
duratothemax's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by 01smoker
If they would make a inline 6 Duramax, we might have some competition.

uh...they already do...
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 12:58 AM
  #29  
Mopardan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Central Arkansas
Originally Posted by Hairy05cmns
Why can't a company the size of dodge come up with a good pickup truck diesel engine on its own?

They do have an engine if they chose to use it. Can you say "Mercedes"
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 06:58 AM
  #30  
ruquik's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: Downingtown, PA/Milford, DE
All i can say is the VT444 aka 7.3 powerstroke is a great engine. THe 6.0 is a total piece IMO.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.