Fuels / BioDiesel / Diesel Prices Use this forum to discuss your biodiesel information, and to find the best price on fuel.

Is's here

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2008, 08:36 PM
  #46  
Muted one day, Banned the next....... Ah the life of a DTR 1%'er
 
cincydiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ohio: Home of the disappointing sports teams
Posts: 2,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sdaly
Oh please, stop! I'm getting a cramp in my side from laughing so hard!
I figured someone get a laugh at that
cincydiesel is offline  
Old 05-15-2008, 10:59 PM
  #47  
Muted User
 
rebel_horseman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Holden, LA
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by cuccamonga
Six figures tax free. Can I start at that with no experience? Sign me up. Nevertheless, I'm not sure what job you do, but thanks for doing it. I'm sure there's probably a few other places you'd rather be. You probably wouldn't make as much money, but it might be an easier lifestyle.
This place sucks, no doubt. Just here to do my part and get a return on my tax dollar investment. The lowest pay we have makes about $80k and that's for a labor foreman supervising Iraqi citizens. The Infernal Revenue Suckers let me keep $86k of my pay tax-free if I'm out of the country for 330 days out of 365.

I'm always looking forward to coming home. My first daughter was born in February and I missed that cause I was over here. I did get to see her for 2 weeks last month while I was on R&R. Soon as my contract is up or I find a decent job back home, I'm flying out.


Originally Posted by cuccamonga
Iraq is one thing and I think the oil prices is another. And I honestly don't feel like their hugely connected. So back to big oil. I still haven't received any answers to why our barrel price has to stay competitive with OPEC's and why we are exporting so much. Surely someone can elaborate.
We absolutely deserve compensation for risking American lives and bankrupting our country to get this country caught up with the rest of the world. I certainly think that we deserve to get some of the money back that we pay people here. Every Iraqi contractor here gets paid in cash before the drop their loads. We fly in pallets of cash to pay for things here. I've been told about the C130s full of nothing but pallets of cash. We've spent tons of money rebuilding the crumbling infrastructure that was here.

In addition to that, we have hundres of thousands of gallons of JP8, DF2, and MOGAS that we burn here. The Iraqi drivers get a full tank as they leave the gate. We have all the US and coalition vehicles here that burn beaucoup fuel on a daily basis. That's all fuel that could be burned in domestic vehicles back home if we weren't occupying this country.

In regards to fuel prices, this war is a direct cause of the rise. It's not because production costs are soaring. It's because the value of a dollar is falling. Inflation, caused directly and purposely by the Feuderal Reserve to stymie an economic correction that needs to happen. The costs of inputs are rising because the dollar is falling, and that is because more and more folks are shorting the dollar and the US economy. Instead of spiking interest rates up to help matters, they're inflating our currency and dragging out the correction and making it worse.

There is absolutely no way to discuss fuel price increases without discussing the politics associated with those increases.
rebel_horseman is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 06:45 AM
  #48  
Chapter President
 
crobtex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sedalia, Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Try living in Rifle, Colorado. High prices in Rifle and Glenwood Springs have been an issue for years. I like the part where the distributor says, "Swallow said each retail station sets its own prices." Contradictory to a lot of other info out there.

http://www.citizentelegram.com/home....d00906a0fda9b6
crobtex is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 07:49 AM
  #49  
Muted one day, Banned the next....... Ah the life of a DTR 1%'er
 
cincydiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ohio: Home of the disappointing sports teams
Posts: 2,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remeber driving through Glenwood Springs last year on my way to Paonia. Diesel than was $3.40-3.50 a gallon. That was in September of last year
cincydiesel is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 09:22 AM
  #50  
Registered User
 
Moose10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chaffee, NY
Posts: 1,071
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rebel_horseman
+1 to that.

If ya'll want to place blame, look no farther than the EPA. It's their draconian and utterly retarded rules that have forced the oil companies to stop investing in new facilities. It's their rules that prevent the US from enjoying many fuel efficient vehicles that the rest of the world gets to enjoy. It's their rules that cause manufacturer to spend tons of money in R&D to come up with things like EGR

Example, over here there are tons of small diesel vehicles. Toyotal Land Cruisers, Toyota Hilux, Mitsubishi, Ford Ranger, etc. They all have small 4-cylinder diesels. The Ranger has a 4-cyl. turbocharged diesel, 5-speed transmission, is a 4-door short bed truck, and from what I've been told gets about 30 mpg on DF2. But it's only available in foreign Middle East markets. The diesel won't pass the EPA's standards so the US consumer doesn't get an efficient little truck and instead has to buy a gasser job that may get 20 mpg on unleaded.
Sounds like a hell of a plan that would probably workI say do it!
Oh and you're right about the 4cyl Rangers....I drive one almost daily over here....I'll get a pic up of it.....it hauls butt too, and you can hear the little turbo spool up right when it pushes you back into your seat.
Moose10 is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 10:36 AM
  #51  
Registered User
 
WVAussie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We absolutely deserve compensation for risking American lives and bankrupting our country to get this country caught up with the rest of the world.
They didn't ask for our intervention. You wouldn't pay for services provided to you without your permission, although it sounds like you could afford to.
WVAussie is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 11:23 AM
  #52  
Muted User
 
rebel_horseman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Holden, LA
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nope they didn't ask. They were perfectly content living in their crummy little hovels without running water or basic medical care and constantly fearful of torture and murder by the dictator in Baghdad. Now, their quality of life has been greatly elevated because of our intervention and as such we should get some compensation. We are here, we've done a lot of good things, and as such we should be rewarded for our success here as well as compensation for the piles of arms, ammo, logistical items, and training we've provided to the military and police forces.

But that also goes back to my previous statement. We shouldn't have cared in the first place and shouldn't be here. It also wouldn't hurt my feelings (nor the feelings of most of the folks in theater) if we were told to ruck up and prepare to leave the country tomorrow. If our leaders actually cared about honoring the legacy of the founding fathers, we wouldn't be concerning ourselves with the affairs of anything outside our borders (among many other issues, none of which are directly relevant to this discussion.)

In regards to this:
You wouldn't pay for services provided to you without your permission, although it sounds like you could afford to.
Well my old 1st Gen needs a paint job and I'd be pleasently surprised if it had a nice coat of paint on it when I get home next month.
rebel_horseman is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 12:05 PM
  #53  
Registered User
 
chipmonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rebel_horseman
If our leaders actually cared about honoring the legacy of the founding fathers, we wouldn't be concerning ourselves with the affairs of anything outside our borders (among many other issues, none of which are directly relevant to this discussion.)
pre 9/11 i would say that statement is correct, but if you pulled pieces out of the 'pile' at the WTC site, you would have seen what happens when we let certain groups (both in and outside our borders) exist, and gain power. i'm not saying us being in Iraq is related to us being attacked or not, but the days of the U.S. only being concerned about what goes on within our borders, are about 7 years gone.
chipmonk is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 10:53 PM
  #54  
Muted User
 
rebel_horseman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Holden, LA
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by chipmonk
pre 9/11 i would say that statement is correct, but if you pulled pieces out of the 'pile' at the WTC site, you would have seen what happens when we let certain groups (both in and outside our borders) exist, and gain power. i'm not saying us being in Iraq is related to us being attacked or not, but the days of the U.S. only being concerned about what goes on within our borders, are about 7 years gone.
Guess where these Muslims got the training and funds? US intervention policy that has been in place for decades. Case in point, Osama (not the idiot running for president) received training and a large amount of support and funding from the US through the CIA to fight the Russians. Then we abandoned him and he got upset. Saddam was our best buddy right until he went into Kuwait, and the only reason he went in there is because we wouldn't tell Kuwait to stop drilling under the border into Iraqi oil fields. We snubbed Saddam and he got upset. This is a pattern. This isn't a recent problem; our "leaders" have been sticking their noses in places we shouldn't care about for a long time.

I can almost guarantee that this country would be much better off if we 1. stop running all over the world playing world police force in every jerk water country, 2. seal the borders, 3. bill Mexico for all social services provided to illegals, 4. impose high import tariffs on foreign good and high export tariffs on us food and fuel exports, 5. end the anchor baby scam for illegals, 6. deflate the Feuderal gooberment by at least 50% (easily accomplished by dissolving useless departments such as the EPA, IRS, ATF, etc. and descaling many others), 7. stop paying farmers not to farm their land, and 8. end ridiculous entitlement programs (welfare, Socialist Security, TOPS, etc.) and force Americans to get off their butts and get a job and contribute to society instead of leaching off it.

These things will dramatically decrease our government expenses, decrease the amount of money being stolen from taxpayers every paycheck, increase food production, eliminate foreign demand of our fuel products, increase revenue from tariffs, and eliminate the dregs of society who will either have to work for a change or starve to death.

Heck, come to think of it, the best thing that could happen is to vote Ron Paul into office. Course that means the sheeple would have to vote for a good candidate instead of the lesser of 2 evils.
rebel_horseman is offline  
Old 05-17-2008, 06:14 AM
  #55  
Registered User
 
WVAussie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heck, come to think of it, the best thing that could happen is to vote Ron Paul into office
I wish.
I agree with everything you just said above. Accountability is at the core of your points and if we let such boneheaded endeavors take place then we are accountable, and we need to take our lumps and hopefully learn something. We can pay the bills. If we could only get back the kids we lost.
WVAussie is offline  
Old 05-17-2008, 09:06 AM
  #56  
Registered User
 
chipmonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
regardless of what ron paul or the libertarian party say (who i agree with on lots of domestic issues), osama and the islama-facists have hated us for way longer than the russian invasion of afghanistan. they have been slaughtering each other for centuries, because they disagree on how to worship the same god! they despise christians and jews because we're the 'infidels', and they believe god has commanded them to do away with us, in a 'holy war'. this really came to a head when Israel was victorious in the 6 day war in 1967, which humiliated the islama-facists, and bin ladan himself has said that was the turning point for himself and many others, in their desire to destroy America and Israel. in a way, i wish everybody who offers an opinion on this issue, had spent a day or an hour or even 5 minutes on the WTC pile- it might give some a very different perspective.
chipmonk is offline  
Old 05-18-2008, 10:51 PM
  #57  
Registered User
 
kawi600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Boston, mASS
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by chipmonk
regardless of what ron paul or the libertarian party say (who i agree with on lots of domestic issues), osama and the islama-facists have hated us for way longer than the russian invasion of afghanistan.
Nah.. there will always be a few kooks that want to blow up [insert random place here], but 99% of whats out there now is self-inflicted with our lunatic foreign policy.
Our soldiers in the middle east have a great viewpoint to see whats going on. It speaks volumes that ron paul gets the most military donations of all the candidates.
Both parties need to come to the negotiating table. its wrong to call one group criminal and turn a blind eye to the other when they both have committed atrocities.
We cant keep feeding money and other support to one faction in that struggle and remain blameless. Of course they will hate us and try to attack us. If the situation was reversed, we'd all do the same. Fighting a war with whatever we could rig up to serve as a weapon.
We think theyre coming over here because they want to kill or convert Christians? They think the very same thing.. they call us 'crusaders'!
We should be engaging these countries at the negotiating table, in trade and in friendship but never interfering in internal issues. The founders were experienced and well-read in the history of other nations. They suffered under an overbearing government and unfair taxation. They understood what it was like to be subject to illegal searches and indefinite incarceration without a trial. They gave us the very best advice possible in the constitution. We are fools of the worst kind to ignore that advice.
kawi600 is offline  
Old 05-18-2008, 11:04 PM
  #58  
Registered User
 
chipmonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kawi600
Nah.. there will always be a few kooks that want to blow up [insert random place here], but 99% of whats out there now is self-inflicted with our lunatic foreign policy.
Both parties need to come to the negotiating table. its wrong to call one group criminal and turn a blind eye to the other when they both have committed atrocities.
We cant keep feeding money and other support to one faction in that struggle and remain blameless. Of course they will hate us and try to attack us. If the situation was reversed, we'd all do the same. Fighting a war with whatever we could rig up to serve as a weapon.
We think theyre coming over here because they want to kill or convert Christians? They think the very same thing.. they call us 'crusaders'!
We should be engaging these countries at the negotiating table, in trade and in friendship but never interfering in internal issues. The founders were experienced and well-read in the history of other nations. They suffered under an overbearing government and unfair taxation. They understood what it was like to be subject to illegal searches and indefinite incarceration without a trial. They gave us the very best advice possible in the constitution. We are fools of the worst kind to ignore that advice.
you need to take a good, hard look at your post, and realize that 3000 families don't have one of their own sitting down to Sunday dinner with them, and haven't for nearly 7 years. you can never sit down and have a meaningful conversation with a group of people, who believe their god has commanded them to kill you, and will reward you for doing so. they aren't just attacking the U.S., they plot and carry out terrorist attacks all over the world, so what have all those other countries done to them? simply disagreed with them. do you understand that they have been torturing and slaughtering EACH OTHER for centuries just because of slight differences in how they worship THE SAME god!
chipmonk is offline  
Old 05-18-2008, 11:10 PM
  #59  
Registered User
 
kawi600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Boston, mASS
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Actually.. theyve lost more people than we have. The numbers of civilians dead in Iraq is staggering.
Look at Israel and Palestine. They have both lost so many people to the fight and both hate each other so much the violence will never end.
Do we want to be like that? Were not a very Christian nation at all if we cant forgive and make peace.
'an eye for an eye' dates back thousands of years. We havent evolved since then?
kawi600 is offline  
Old 05-18-2008, 11:51 PM
  #60  
Muted User
 
rebel_horseman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Holden, LA
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Here's an interesting interview with Richard Maybury who has some good insight on the causes of our involvement in the Middle East.

http://chaostan.com/bulletin-090107.html

Richard Maybury: The country and the government are not the same thing. I love this country and would not want to live anywhere else, but I consider the government to be the country's most dangerous enemy. Washington is taxing us to death, it's throwing the best medical system in the world into boundless confusion, it's interfering in absolutely every aspect of our lives, its foreign policy for more than a century has been to wander the globe poking sharp sticks at rattlesnakes, and it's packed with crooks and liars.

Pat: (Laughing) Well, I can see where you get your reputation for being subtle. Let's get started. Correct me if I'm wrong, wasn't it during the 1979 Iranian Hostage Crisis that Iranians rose up against Washington's pet tyrant, the Shah of Iran, who was terrorizing them?

Richard Maybury: Yes. Washington had put the dictator in power and backed him for 25 years, because he claimed to be pro-American.

Pat: Then in 1980, shortly after the killing of Egypt's Anwar Sadat - also backed by Washington - you wrote a 22-page special report called The Thousand Year War. In an effort to avert the disaster we're in today, more than a half-million copies of that report were distributed. You said that if Washington did not stop meddling in Islamic homelands, and backing Mideast tyrants, America would end up in a world war with Muslims.
rebel_horseman is offline  


Quick Reply: Is's here



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 PM.