I hate ULSD.... - Page 2 - Dodge Diesel - Diesel Truck Resource Forums



Fuels / BioDiesel / Diesel Prices Use this forum to discuss your biodiesel information, and to find the best price on fuel.

I hate ULSD....

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-04-2006, 10:21 AM   #16
Administrator / Scooter Bum
 
Shovelhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 9,055
It seems Diesel & Gasser alike have a new cross to bear. and it's called EPA Clean Air Regs.
The tests with gassers running E85 Ethanol/Gasoline show a reduction of ~25% in mpg over straight gasoline.
At least we're still looking at better efficiency.
Shovelhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2006, 10:43 AM   #17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Alvin
Posts: 213
Didnt someone post on this site from a Cummins rep that the ULSD has the same BTU per gallon as the LSD? My mileage has not decreased. Still hovering around 20-21.
SolarExpress is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 09:23 PM   #18
Registered User
 
srt20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: watertown, wisconsin
Posts: 266
I think it has made its way here. My last 2 tank fills were lower by 2-3 mpg also.
srt20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 09:46 PM   #19
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: central Ind.
Posts: 227
What gripes me is they are useing it as a excuse,to keep diesel prices high. If gas drops much more around here,there is going to be a dollar a gallon differance,between gas and diesel,it's at 77 cents now.
rustbucket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 10:42 PM   #20
Registered User
 
chaos24valve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Litchfield Park, Arizona
Posts: 133
Thats ridiculous, we still have the old smokey diesel here, guess we need to get our kicks in on it now before things get worse!!!! ;.; Bye bye smoke.
chaos24valve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 02:58 PM   #21
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 1,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCW View Post
ULSD has about a 12% lower BTU rating than the previous low sulphur version.
From Chevron's ULSD FAQs:
Quote:
Energy Content:
In general, the processing required to reduce sulfur to 15 ppm also reduces the aromatics content and density of diesel fuel, resulting in a reduction in energy content (BTU/gal). The expected reduction in energy content is on the order of 1% and may affect fuel mileage.
Rusty
RustyJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 04:21 PM   #22
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 58
i dont think i have run it yet but my brother has seen it around our area. and i hate the fact that there are 70 cents difference between gas and diesel. maybe i have ran it, i was wondering y i was loosing some economy....hhhmmmmm im gonna have to check into that.
BowtiedCTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 04:25 PM   #23
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: kingston,wa
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by infidel View Post
, not just for yourself but for those you support with earned and tax dollars.
are you trying to start another rant on the welfare system?

ulsd isnt here yet, the mileage is bad enough. not much I can do there, just wondering what it is actually going to do to my performance though.
dodgezilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 04:32 PM   #24
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Alvin
Posts: 213
Diesel has been averaging about 40 cents a gallon more than regular here in Houston. I did see it for 2.749 at a Shell station on my way to work this morning. I find it hard to believe is costs the refiners ~.50/gallon more to make ULSD than it did to make LSD. Are they trying to recoup ALL of their investment on their new refining equipment immediately? Are diesel drivers now subsidizing the gasoline drivers? I see no reason for diesel to be so much higher than gas. Even ULSD in not as refined a product as regular unleaded.
SolarExpress is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 04:33 PM   #25
Registered User
 
JCJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sykesville, MD
Posts: 32
Noticed yesterday that the local station had changed the sticker to say that 2007 and newer CAN run this fuel.

Only ran ~120 miles so far, and the overhead is reading 15.2 (remodeling my bathroom, and like any plumbing job, it takes 5 trips to Home Depot to get everything, so there were 4 or 5 trips of 6 miles roundtrip in there to kill the mileage).

With the trip I made yesterday, plus a bunch of small trips, I would normally still read 16.1 - 16.4 on the overhead (which normally runs 16.5-17.0 hand calc'd).

I realize 1/4 tank isn't very revealing, but so far it seems as though it has dropped a bit...and if you figure that I still had about 5 gal of LSD in the tank, it does not bode well for the ULSD. Guess I'll get a better feel after a few tanks...I'll just tell the wife that I have to make a bunch of trips for "research!".

BTW...the station with the ULSD dropped almost 30 cents in the week since I last filled up, and that was when they were still running LSD. Now they are about 10 cents cheaper than the Exxon a mile away that still has LSD. Go figure.
JCJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 04:49 PM   #26
Registered User
 
bnold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 2,184
Saw a difference of 88cents in Denton TX!!!!!
bnold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 08:47 PM   #27
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 14,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by dodgezilla04 View Post
are you trying to start another rant on the welfare system?

Not at all, but you know as well as I that if someone who can't afford it gets sick in this country they aren't denied treatment. All of us end up paying for sickness in the long run.
infidel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2006, 04:18 PM   #28
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: kingston,wa
Posts: 0
how correct you are.
dodgezilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2006, 10:21 AM   #29
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 123
I've actually gotten better efficiencies with ULSD. I got an average of 21 in Texas this summer with it (city highway) and got about 18 with B99. In New Mexico I found some and got 24 mpg. With the LSD here in Oklahoma I get about 19 mpg.

I remember hearing somewhere that the ULSD is supposed to have a higher cetane number, but I could just be delirious.
taildragger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2006, 11:08 AM   #30
Registered User
 
Lee S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Shreveport LA
Posts: 98
"...if someone who can't afford it gets sick in this country they aren't denied treatment."

That depends on what insurance company is involved.
Lee S is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another Reason To Hate Ulsd chipmonk Fuels / BioDiesel / Diesel Prices 3 05-13-2008 02:32 PM
I hate people. I mean really really HATE THEM!!! 05CTDN8 Other 57 01-23-2007 10:35 PM
I hate you guys and I hate this site... ptgarcia 3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only) 27 11-18-2006 10:00 PM
12v, 24v & ULSD Palmetto_kid General Diesel Discussion 3 07-14-2004 10:38 AM
Cummins supports ULSD Lightman General Diesel Discussion 3 10-30-2003 06:36 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 AM.


Copyright 2017, DieselTruckResource.com We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.