Could this cause a problem for future biodiesel production?
#16
I was banned per my own request for speaking the name Pelosi
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bristol Michigan
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That was part one of the study, part two is gonna explain how the yeild from hemp exceeds the energy demand of production.
#17
Registered User
Originally posted by Redleg
That was part one of the study, part two is gonna explain how the yeild from hemp exceeds the energy demand of production.
That was part one of the study, part two is gonna explain how the yeild from hemp exceeds the energy demand of production.
#18
Originally posted by Redleg
That was part one of the study, part two is gonna explain how the yeild from hemp exceeds the energy demand of production.
That was part one of the study, part two is gonna explain how the yeild from hemp exceeds the energy demand of production.
There are about 500 good uses for the hemp plant, but some people don't understand the difference between it and cannibis sativa. Therefore when you mention the word HEMP, everyone gets all upset thinking we are going to legalize marijuana..........
Just keep thinking that Big Oil's pockets are deeper than most other industries, that's one of the main reasons that alternative fuels are not explored more aggressively.
Ever heard the rumors about them buying up the rights to fancy carb's that got like 50MPG's, and other conspricy theroies?
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Corpus Christi, Tx.
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by screaminbanana
http://www.ap.nic.in/nrcop/oilpalmglance.html
This is the best plant to go with for oil production. The oil palm produces the highest of oil of any plant I have found online.
http://www.ap.nic.in/nrcop/oilpalmglance.html
This is the best plant to go with for oil production. The oil palm produces the highest of oil of any plant I have found online.
Keith
#20
I was banned per my own request for speaking the name Pelosi
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bristol Michigan
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heard all about the rumors... motor city is only a couple hours away after all. Anybody ever snope it? To a certain extent, I don't care if they smoke themselves into oblivion. Hemp may have good uses, but are they great uses? Not just big brother, but I imagine industry and technology hamper bringing it to market as well. BHSF, DOW, or any of the synthetics producers would be against competittion from hemp politically, and their technology of products that aren't biodegradeable, are water and/or U.V. proof, etc. would dominate any market. Drugs are federally regulated, rape and murder is not. Nobody just lets them go. A sex crime is probably the hardest case to prosecute, even if the suspect is known by the victim. With the volume of cases tried every year, there is gonna be some that slip through, just like everything else in the world. If it happens alot in your area, then that's something to look at locally, are you listening California? It's the stupid or greedy ones that get caught doing the drug crimes, not everybody. The reply was a knock on Berkley for publishing a study on something that seems to have the potential for a solution they did not appear to have looked into. How long did they feed wood to the locomotive that was pulling coal cars before they got one that ran on coal? How long did they use a steam powered pump oil for an oil well before they got a diesel pump? Seems to me Brekely has done a number of studies on superfluous topics.
#21
I've been in contact with a lot of folks at Berkely, some higer-ups even, trying to chase algae-production schemes, and I've never gotten anything but the cold shoulder... Berkely is strange when it comes to sharing information- essentially all they've ever done is stone-wall me. It seems every researcher there has their own political agenda...
But ultimately, considering that all fossil fuels come from algae to begin with, there is no scientific reason for why we can't corner the market by short-cutting the production process by a few million years. The economics are killer, however. Whoever figures it out is going to make just a little bit of bank. And I'll be damned if they figure out hydrogen-production schemes first; but unfortunately, that's where the research is going. At least CE-CERT out in my neck of the woods is still on the bioDiesel bandwagon...
But ultimately, considering that all fossil fuels come from algae to begin with, there is no scientific reason for why we can't corner the market by short-cutting the production process by a few million years. The economics are killer, however. Whoever figures it out is going to make just a little bit of bank. And I'll be damned if they figure out hydrogen-production schemes first; but unfortunately, that's where the research is going. At least CE-CERT out in my neck of the woods is still on the bioDiesel bandwagon...
#22
Registered User
Originally posted by Begle1
I've been in contact with a lot of folks at Berkely, some higer-ups even, trying to chase algae-production schemes, and I've never gotten anything but the cold shoulder... Berkely is strange when it comes to sharing information- essentially all they've ever done is stone-wall me. It seems every researcher there has their own political agenda...
But ultimately, considering that all fossil fuels come from algae to begin with, there is no scientific reason for why we can't corner the market by short-cutting the production process by a few million years. The economics are killer, however. Whoever figures it out is going to make just a little bit of bank. And I'll be damned if they figure out hydrogen-production schemes first; but unfortunately, that's where the research is going. At least CE-CERT out in my neck of the woods is still on the bioDiesel bandwagon...
I've been in contact with a lot of folks at Berkely, some higer-ups even, trying to chase algae-production schemes, and I've never gotten anything but the cold shoulder... Berkely is strange when it comes to sharing information- essentially all they've ever done is stone-wall me. It seems every researcher there has their own political agenda...
But ultimately, considering that all fossil fuels come from algae to begin with, there is no scientific reason for why we can't corner the market by short-cutting the production process by a few million years. The economics are killer, however. Whoever figures it out is going to make just a little bit of bank. And I'll be damned if they figure out hydrogen-production schemes first; but unfortunately, that's where the research is going. At least CE-CERT out in my neck of the woods is still on the bioDiesel bandwagon...
#23
Registered User
Well, those studies might be interesting- but then why do we manage to run a farm entirely on biodiesel, without fertilizers or pesticides, herbicides etc (one big consumer of dino juice), run all the farm vehicles and still sell some biodiesel- transported to the station with a biodiesel powered truck?
Naturally this is expensive, but some farmers over here do manage it. One big problem on that is only that if yu look at the net gain per area Austria would need to be many times the size it is to supply all the vehicles on the road etc with biofuels.
Just my 2c
AlpineRAM
PS- it's legal to grow hemp over here- it just needs to be one of those extremely low THC sorts, so it's no use smoking it
Naturally this is expensive, but some farmers over here do manage it. One big problem on that is only that if yu look at the net gain per area Austria would need to be many times the size it is to supply all the vehicles on the road etc with biofuels.
Just my 2c
AlpineRAM
PS- it's legal to grow hemp over here- it just needs to be one of those extremely low THC sorts, so it's no use smoking it
#24
Originally posted by AlpineRAM
Well, those studies might be interesting- but then why do we manage to run a farm entirely on biodiesel, without fertilizers or pesticides, herbicides etc (one big consumer of dino juice), run all the farm vehicles and still sell some biodiesel- transported to the station with a biodiesel powered truck?
Naturally this is expensive, but some farmers over here do manage it. One big problem on that is only that if yu look at the net gain per area Austria would need to be many times the size it is to supply all the vehicles on the road etc with biofuels.
Just my 2c
AlpineRAM
PS- it's legal to grow hemp over here- it just needs to be one of those extremely low THC sorts, so it's no use smoking it
Well, those studies might be interesting- but then why do we manage to run a farm entirely on biodiesel, without fertilizers or pesticides, herbicides etc (one big consumer of dino juice), run all the farm vehicles and still sell some biodiesel- transported to the station with a biodiesel powered truck?
Naturally this is expensive, but some farmers over here do manage it. One big problem on that is only that if yu look at the net gain per area Austria would need to be many times the size it is to supply all the vehicles on the road etc with biofuels.
Just my 2c
AlpineRAM
PS- it's legal to grow hemp over here- it just needs to be one of those extremely low THC sorts, so it's no use smoking it
And what crop would they be growing?
#25
Registered User
I think the people who did this study are pushing their own idea of energy production of solar and wind power. The idea that it takes 1.23 gallons of fuel to produce 1 gallon of biodiesel is simply preposterous. I'm sure the stats were massaged in order to show what they wanted.
Also, using soybean oil for biodiesel isn't the best use of the land. Soybeans produces about 48 gallons/acre and is pretty far down on the list of oil crops. Palm oil yields are the highest at 635 gal/acre. Even peanuts are more than double the yield at 113 gal/acre. There are many more crops which yield more than soybeans.
Look here for more info: http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html
Edwin
Also, using soybean oil for biodiesel isn't the best use of the land. Soybeans produces about 48 gallons/acre and is pretty far down on the list of oil crops. Palm oil yields are the highest at 635 gal/acre. Even peanuts are more than double the yield at 113 gal/acre. There are many more crops which yield more than soybeans.
Look here for more info: http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html
Edwin
#26
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Missoula, Montana
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Remember no conversion is 100%. There will be some losses. I did not see any information about energy required for #2 processing. Considering most vehicles are only 30-40% effecient I don't think the small percentage increase (if it is in an increase) of conversion losses would mean much.
Randy
Randy
#27
Registered User
The main energy oil crop is rapeseed over here. Palmtrees won't really like it and the women won't knit them any pullovers
The yield is about 2.6 times higher than with soybeans.
Over here the fuel oil crops are grown separately and they don't need too much if any chemical support because the problems you have with rapeseed will only ruin the taste in most cases but will only have a minimal impact on the yield.
AlpineRAM
The yield is about 2.6 times higher than with soybeans.
Over here the fuel oil crops are grown separately and they don't need too much if any chemical support because the problems you have with rapeseed will only ruin the taste in most cases but will only have a minimal impact on the yield.
AlpineRAM
#28
Registered User
Lets see now, with farms subsidised to grow nothing, I would guess that it would not take too much gain to make it worthwhile. Something is better than nothing.