1000+hp d-max
 

check out the link

Link removed- Do not post links to ant site that contains profanity

Thank you begle1 for pointing out this violation so I could remove it

Do you see the guy called McRat with the first response?

Yeah, I clean his swimming pool... Small world...

1000 HP/ 2000 Ft. Lbs is pretty wild. It's reflective of how the V-8 puts out more horsepower per foot pound; a P-Pumped Cummins with 2000 foot pounds is putting out 800 horsepower?

Oh, nice freakin' trolling iker. [dummy] Grow up.
You should be ashamed of yourself. I don't doubt their numbers for a second.



On another note, this dyno event was three miles from my house. If I drive out there now I could probably get some pictures for you...

Or does the Cummins just put out more lb-ft per hp?

As far as I could tell, you registered just to annoy people in their time of success by saying that you don't respect their "maxipad" because it isn't a Cummins. They all obviously have very high levels of skill, money and effort into their trucks, you don't need to show your ignorance by countering 1,000 HP by making fun of their truck's names and saying that it won't be as reliable as a Cummins. [dummy]

HP is what gets you down the track; torque is what breaks drivelines as you try to leave the Christmas tree. [coffee]

cummins typically makes peak torque at a lower rpm. hp= tq.x rpm/5252 so if 2 trucks make 1000 ft. llbs. but one does it at a lower rpm that truck will have a smaller hp number.

I'll 2nd that...

Well, there's a little more to it than that. To a certain extent, peak torque and peak hp are independant. It was meant as a joke...

Congrates to the D-Max crew and their great numbers.

Was that number with the stock internals?

I'm gonna have to disagree with you on that....Horsepower and torque are directly related. Horsepower is calculated from torque at a certain RPM, and they are both ALWAYS equal at 5252 RPMs

I know how hp is calculated. The shape of the torque curve is going to have more impact on the peak hp then what rpm the peak torque occured at. If the torque curve is more flat, then you will have higher peak hp numbers. If the torque curve starts falling off after peak torque you will have lower hp numbers.

We really need to see the dyno because, at this point, we are just guessing where that truck starts making it's torque.

Crower Rods, non-oem pistons, CNC ported head, and some Don M sticks....at least that's what was posted on Comp Diesel!

Chris

1000 + HP D-max
 

That is just freekin incredable! Congrates to to all involved.

Scott

I thought Mad dog put down something like 994/1800, if that is the case, then this Duramax has more torque per hp, then Maddog's Cummins. I am sure my memory is distorted. Let me know.

And another put down 1020/1720 and 830/1460 w/o nitrous.

Stock pistons Machined for lower compression and Ceramic coated.

i called keith to get the lowdown..... he said the very first run on the dyno with a small tune made over 830hp, then did some tune tweaking and was around 1000hp with no smoke, twins spull up very quickly and rail pressure has not came off the commaned 26k, this is great news.... they feel their still is another 200 hp to grab from this motor with more fueling, and only pushing 80lbs boost, but a great starting point to say the least... also stated the allison held over 950 hp with out the copilot being turned on( they forgot to turn it on!! wow) that is some tranny!! i guess we will see what the future details... he is looking to be towing with this setup soon, cant wait to get a ride in it next week

i have a feeling we will see this setup dupicated by the summer if all holds well

great job to keith, merchant auto, guy and tony... patents prevails

Another 200? Are you sure? I told the guys that there is at least another 200. If you guys knew how mundane the fueling was, you would do a back flip.

and i fogot to mention a thanks to DON M... your injectors look very promising...

And Guy Tripp. That dude rocks.

Its a heck of a team here. There is plenty more where this came from as long as everyone keeps their head on straight and acts like an adult, we could go very far.

Yee Haww.

Heres to the first 1000 HP CR engine.

and i forgot to mention Nathan Wright for his mighty twin setup

Just FYI, MADDOG has put down 1085HP and 1980TQ...so for now, he's still the big dog!

But I can't wait to see who comes out with the next big number:D:D

Where's the Ford Guys????
Chris :p

Are these Cummins numbers you guys are throwing around for HPCR's or P-Pumps?

Maddogs got a p-pump in his truck. Its a ford crew cab on 37s with a cummins. Its a nice ride and fast at the track with the big meats on.

Gruble grumble bloody grumble...



Aftermarket camshaft? [whistle]

Maddog dynoed: 1085hp and 1990lbs recently

both the dmax and maddog dynoed on a dynoyet
Of coarse the dyno-jet winpep 7 only measures to 1800 ft-lb TQ They would have had to use some math to come up with the 1958 number. Just like maddog had to come up with the 1990

imagine if the cummins was an eight cylinder mmmmmm.

Here's Maddog w/ major traction problems:See top middle vid.

http://www.nhrda.com/2006/DRV09162006.htm

What about a 6.7 Cummins.............?[guitar]

What if the guys from schieds and haisleys and eep and all of them put out thier dyno numbers with there pullin trucks. Then who would be the masters of power with diesel.[guitar]

Well it's was a good day for the dmax and common rail injection. The twin CP pumps and EFI tuning have really helped the dmax. I hear will be in the cummins as well very soon. Gonna be fun year for all of us.

That's just stupid power. I don't care if it was a dodge, chevy, or even a ford. Any truck that can make that kinda power and still be driven on the street is top notch in my book.

I was not crowning anyone big dog, or anything like that, I was just pointing out that the Duramax puts out just as much hp per ft lb tq. (Which if your numbers are correct, or mine are, this Duramax is a little better per hp. But I am not here to say one is better then the other. Others here were commenting about how much more tq per hp the Cummins puts out. That's all!

no doubt and congrats to all and here is to the first fuel only 1000 hp cr engine

Was mad dog's dyno results from #2 only, or was water/meth used on it?

When you get to those power levels, the "ratio's" seem to even out...but for most of us, the Cummins usually ALWAYS makes more torque per HP....at least here in Central Ohio! My old 95 at 400hp was putting down more torque than some Duramaxs with 525-550.

At least that's what I see! Don't take this as a bash, or a "Dodge is better:p" post, that's not how I mean it! 1000hp is 1000hp, I don't care who makes it, I'll congratulate them! I've said it all along that the Duramax has impressed me...but I still like my old 12v's:D:D

Chris

It will be interestinf to see how much those blocks can take. BTW MADDOG is not the top dawg. There are many pulling trucks (I hear) that are putting down double his power.

Yeah...you hear, I hear...but they can't prove it! They also CAN'T drive them on the street! I think that's what most of us are after:D

Chris

I agree with this 100 percent, no matter who does it and with what platform, 1000 hp is alot of time, money, and hard work invested to do so and it isnt a goal that just anyone can do with any truck. Again give the credit where credit is due.

BTW, maddogs truck is nuts...

Rick