Documented proof of 4500/5500.
10-25-2006, 08:07 AM
#17
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Man that stinks. They were there, and I could read them. I don't know why they removed it? Finally, documented proof that the 4500/5500 series is coming and they took it down?
10-25-2006, 09:30 AM
#24
It's not an image of the trucks, just and image of an internal DC document showing that they are going to be a 2007 model, which means they should show any time.
Our rules are quite specific about posting material that does not belong to you on this site. I would be willing to bet that in your Dealership License from Chrysler there is a clause that prohibits you releasing proprietary information.
Maybe you don't care if you get involved in a law suit with Chrysler, but I see no need for you to drag me into it by placing stuff like that on here.
10-25-2006, 09:48 AM
#25
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You answer your own question as to why they would go away in this statement you posted early on in this thread. That is an INTERNAL DC Document and NOT meant for public viewing.
Our rules are quite specific about posting material that does not belong to you on this site. I would be willing to bet that in your Dealership License from Chrysler there is a clause that prohibits you releasing proprietary information.
Maybe you don't care if you get involved in a law suit with Chrysler, but I see no need for you to drag me into it by placing stuff like that on here.
Our rules are quite specific about posting material that does not belong to you on this site. I would be willing to bet that in your Dealership License from Chrysler there is a clause that prohibits you releasing proprietary information.
Maybe you don't care if you get involved in a law suit with Chrysler, but I see no need for you to drag me into it by placing stuff like that on here.
All right, I see you point. Maybe I used the wrong terminology earlier. It's not an actual internal document as I have it and I do not work for DC. In fact, any customer could request that I give them a copy of the program rules that they were going to participate in. If they did not want this information out then I wouldn't have it, as I am free to share it with any customer that asks. I apologize for the trouble, not trying to cause any, all though it seems I have a habit of doing that without realizing it at the time.
10-25-2006, 10:28 AM
#26
Luke you are not causing any trouble, you have always presented yourself here in a professional manner. My point is that you can give us the same info, without actually posting a copy of an internal memo.
We trust you, I have yet to see anyone post anything saying you are less than honest in your business practice, so frankly your word is good enough for us
For the record I didn't remove those pictures and don't know who did, but that seems the most likely reason why they would have been.
We trust you, I have yet to see anyone post anything saying you are less than honest in your business practice, so frankly your word is good enough for us
For the record I didn't remove those pictures and don't know who did, but that seems the most likely reason why they would have been.
10-25-2006, 10:40 AM
#27
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, thanks for the kind words. What I meant was, once in awhile I post something quickly without thinking about and don't realize until after it was deleted, "boy, that was dumb". I am not a very inteligent person you see. I appreciate you trusting my word, but as you know, everybody on here wants proof of stuff as big a deal as this, and to be fair, I was wrong about the supposed release of the new 68rfe trans. I kept saying the Aisin would be in both the C&C and the pick-up, because I had gotten that right out of the mouths of high up DC zone staff. As we now know, that was wrong, so that is at least once where I didn't know what I was talking about. I'll try not to let it happen again.
10-25-2006, 10:44 AM
#28
Ok, thanks for the kind words. What I meant was, once in awhile I post something quickly without thinking about and don't realize until after it was deleted, "boy, that was dumb". I am not a very inteligent person you see. I appreciate you trusting my word, but as you know, everybody on here wants proof of stuff as big a deal as this, and to be fair, I was wrong about the supposed release of the new 68rfe trans. I kept saying the Aisin would be in both the C&C and the pick-up, because I had gotten that right out of the mouths of high up DC zone staff. As we now know, that was wrong, so that is at least once where I didn't know what I was talking about. I'll try not to let it happen again.
But your input is always appreciated on the new stuff and we all look forward to your updates 
