17.9 Mpg... Woot!!!
#16
Registered User
Recalibration?
DrDiesel
I think everyone on this post already knows that the overhead is off... Overheads on the newer trucks don't show instantaneous avg- only the average since the last time it was reset. My highest avg per tank has read 26.1 mpg, but I was only getting about 20mpg hand calculated.
I think everyone on this post already knows that the overhead is off... Overheads on the newer trucks don't show instantaneous avg- only the average since the last time it was reset. My highest avg per tank has read 26.1 mpg, but I was only getting about 20mpg hand calculated.
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: On a tiny compound in Montana
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So your telling us the over heads are reading incorrectly...
I think not. I think you need to learn how it works before you make statements of inaccuracy. This component is something that you don`t understand.
This is no aimed at anyone. This is a statement/reply to all the talk of the over heads being incorrect. They are not designed to give per Tank MPG.
I think not. I think you need to learn how it works before you make statements of inaccuracy. This component is something that you don`t understand.
This is no aimed at anyone. This is a statement/reply to all the talk of the over heads being incorrect. They are not designed to give per Tank MPG.
Chapter 3: Understanding the Features of Your Vehicle
Section: Overhead Console with Compass/Temperature Mini-Trip Computer-if equipped
Page 136, first paragraph under the heading "Average Fuel Economy":
Shows the average fuel economy since the last reset. Average fuel economy is a running average of the amount of fuel used and the distance the vehicle has traveled.
So if you reset at every fill up, it will in fact be a per tank average.
#18
The overhead is for general reference, I believe that is why they got RID of the instant mileage, it was just TOO much of a joke to believe.
As far as getting those numbers on a low mile truck like that?? GREAT! I didn't start seeing over 14.75 until 3K miles. Now at about 4K miles I get 16.5 regularly with mixed driving.
#19
Oh, and I just now changed out my OE oil. I wanted to do it at 3500, ended up doing it at 4030. No harm done, the owners manual says NOTHING but 7500, no "break in" change recommendations.
I wouldn't wait the whole 7500 the first time, but I can't imagine 3 to 5K is going to hurt anything.
I wouldn't wait the whole 7500 the first time, but I can't imagine 3 to 5K is going to hurt anything.
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have messed around with mine and have figured out that if you figure your mileage on where the pump kicks off when filling then the overhead is pretty close to that. If you top off your tank, as I do mine, then my overhead is over by 1.2- 1.5.
#21
My brother's 03 was off by 2-6mpg, PERIOD. A lot of them are off, whether it was an average per fill, at the time or anything else. It was innacurate, and he never ran any box at the time. (He had an Edge EZ for a few months before he sold it, and the overhead was still off.) There are a lot of knowledgable people on here, and obviously the overheads are not always on.
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That`s absolutely correct.
The over head can not read fuel usage until the float inside the tank starts to drop.
So when you fill the tank and the fuel level is over the meters float level your fuel readings are off by that much.
My fuel gage takes 70 to 90 miles to move after filling the tank to the top of the filler neck . As I`m sure everyone has.
The over head can not read fuel usage until the float inside the tank starts to drop.
So when you fill the tank and the fuel level is over the meters float level your fuel readings are off by that much.
My fuel gage takes 70 to 90 miles to move after filling the tank to the top of the filler neck . As I`m sure everyone has.
#23
That`s absolutely correct.
The over head can not read fuel usage until the float inside the tank starts to drop.
So when you fill the tank and the fuel level is over the meters float level your fuel readings are off by that much.
My fuel gage takes 70 to 90 miles to move after filling the tank to the top of the filler neck . As I`m sure everyone has.
The over head can not read fuel usage until the float inside the tank starts to drop.
So when you fill the tank and the fuel level is over the meters float level your fuel readings are off by that much.
My fuel gage takes 70 to 90 miles to move after filling the tank to the top of the filler neck . As I`m sure everyone has.
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You are right. However, there are a lot of overhead readings that are innacurate on the trucks, just as there are a lot of Lift pumps that went, and go. We know how they work, and some of us are lucky that they work well. We know that if we drive in 4X4 or stop and go, or very fassssst, or step on it, the average readings per tank are less than if you drive a highway for 300miles at average highway speeds. BUTTT- some are not accurate.
I just think that a lot of bashing by misinformed or misconceptions of a devise, it`s function or design intent is rampant. It`s just easier to trash something if you don`t understand it or don`t care to understand it.
#26
Yeah. I know they are not a true linear gage/readout.
I just think that a lot of bashing by misinformed or misconceptions of a devise, it`s function or design intent is rampant. It`s just easier to trash something if you don`t understand it or don`t care to understand it.
I just think that a lot of bashing by misinformed or misconceptions of a devise, it`s function or design intent is rampant. It`s just easier to trash something if you don`t understand it or don`t care to understand it.
#27
Registered User
Doc, would you please, for those of us that are not grasping your point of view, please define the words; Accumulative and Average and how they differ. My Owners Manual Says Average, You say Accumulative, but then you earlier said something about "the mileage at the time" which means "instantaneous". I am So Confused!
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doc, would you please, for those of us that are not grasping your point of view, please define the words; Accumulative and Average and how they differ. My Owners Manual Says Average, You say Accumulative, but then you earlier said something about "the mileage at the time" which means "instantaneous". I am So Confused!
I never said instantaneous. You did...That`s why your confused...
It`s an average of fuel used to mile driven. It`s a basic logic module function/adaptation of fixed parameters that can be skewed by fuel filling over the meters limit of travel. This adds fuel that the meter can`t read and account for. Therefore your readings are not even close to a hand calculation.
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, some people in this thread are making this topic way to complicated...its not hard to logicaly think about how the overhead works.... especialy when it states directly in the owners manual HOW the overhead works!
#30
Registered User