OK, The Real Numbers Are IN
Originally Posted by texaspower19
ok heres my sheet can some one look at and tell me if they see any thing wrong, it was from 40mph-70mph than 40-80
http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=4/11517402269.jpg&s=x402
http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=4/11517402269.jpg&s=x402
Originally Posted by BRayls
I am not reaming you , only that I know the stock lift pump will not support that kind of hp at the ground. the stock charger will not move the air required to make it either.
ok ive been told that but i was asking some one look at the graph and tell me wats rong
T,
I think what is going on is that the Mustang has different parameters for the operator to input based on your particular truck.....including transmission, weight of the truck etc etc.......and it is to variable.
When we were at Emory, they can't spend all day fine tuning the dyno to your particular truck or mine. They just herd us through like cattle and the settings are what they are. So it SKEWS the numbers based on bad data input. That is what im gathering based on the comments by QZilla and DonM.
The Dynojets are more consistent in a dynoday setting where the operator can't fine tune the dyno to YOUR truck.
The Mustangs CAN be good dynos apparently. Just not practical for you or me.
If you take a calculator and put in the wrong numbers.......it is going to give you bad numbers. The math is right. But it is wrong. If that makes any sense.
Again, I suggest you go get on a dynojet and get a baseline. That way you can repeat the test over and over in future dynos and see what improvements in power you have really made.
I think what is going on is that the Mustang has different parameters for the operator to input based on your particular truck.....including transmission, weight of the truck etc etc.......and it is to variable.
When we were at Emory, they can't spend all day fine tuning the dyno to your particular truck or mine. They just herd us through like cattle and the settings are what they are. So it SKEWS the numbers based on bad data input. That is what im gathering based on the comments by QZilla and DonM.
The Dynojets are more consistent in a dynoday setting where the operator can't fine tune the dyno to YOUR truck.
The Mustangs CAN be good dynos apparently. Just not practical for you or me.
If you take a calculator and put in the wrong numbers.......it is going to give you bad numbers. The math is right. But it is wrong. If that makes any sense.
Again, I suggest you go get on a dynojet and get a baseline. That way you can repeat the test over and over in future dynos and see what improvements in power you have really made.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Common
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
2
Feb 21, 2009 11:40 AM
sCreamin400
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
1
Nov 2, 2008 01:46 PM
2006 MEGACAB
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
37
Aug 6, 2007 07:02 AM



