3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only) Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for third generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories. THIS IS FOR THE 5.9L ONLY!

my numbers are finally where they should be...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 08:18 AM
  #1  
tritont's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
From: NC
my numbers are finally where they should be...

had a fun time at Garmon's dyno day yesterday. There was a ton of trucks there ( the most I've ever seem at a dyno day )
Jeff's truck bed was full of free beer for all and the grill was smokin' along with the trucks

Anyway, I've been having a time getting to the numbers I expected my truck to have. This time around it was set up right...

703hp/1349tq with a single charger on #2
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 08:26 AM
  #2  
Timinva's Avatar
DTR Advertiser
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
From: Va Beach,Va
Congrats, good to see you getting the numbers you been after. Was this on DPMs dyno? Tim
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 08:28 AM
  #3  
bluechrome's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
From: Auburn Ohio
Was that on a 64-14?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 08:40 AM
  #4  
UnrulyNFS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: Central NC
Congrats man. That's awesome!!
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 09:26 AM
  #5  
tritont's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by Timinva
Congrats, good to see you getting the numbers you been after. Was this on DPMs dyno? Tim
Thanks... I'm hoping to be chasing your numbers next

Yeah, it was Dave's dyno....

Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 09:27 AM
  #6  
tritont's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by bluechrome
Was that on a 64-14?

No, it's a silverbullet
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 09:38 AM
  #7  
Don M's Avatar
DTR Advertiser
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 1
From: In the Shop
Very good Ty! At first glance the graphs looked rough/unbalanced, but I see the runs were graphed with the smoothing set on "0".

Now your moving forward Man!
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 09:42 AM
  #8  
35" 05''s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: nc
Nice #'s man. good to see your new set-up workin out for you.

u gonna let people see what mods ur runnin in your sig?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 09:47 AM
  #9  
53 willys's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,259
Likes: 1
From: Utah
Nice job Ty!!!!
sweet numbers
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 09:48 AM
  #10  
PhilR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Killer numbers! What are the highlights of the modifications? How streetable is the set-up? Did you turn it up for the dyno and back down for the drive home, or are you at 700+ hp all the time?

Can't wait to see a 1/4 mile time..
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 10:05 AM
  #11  
tritont's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by PhilR
Killer numbers! What are the highlights of the modifications? How streetable is the set-up? Did you turn it up for the dyno and back down for the drive home, or are you at 700+ hp all the time?

Can't wait to see a 1/4 mile time..
There's lot of mods. I'll fill out my sig here shortly. It's a very streetable 700hp. I don't drive around on the highest setting I can so yes, it was turned up for the dyno. I could drive it on it's highest settings but, the people in the cloud of smoke behind me don't are for that much

I was running a smarty beta 4.2 with limiter control and a MP-8. When driving around on the street I use the bully dog with a custom tune because it's very mild compared to the smarty programs.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 10:07 AM
  #12  
tritont's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by Don M
Very good Ty! At first glance the graphs looked rough/unbalanced, but I see the runs were graphed with the smoothing set on "0".

Now your moving forward Man!
Thanks ! I wondered why the graph looked that way.

Now I have to decide if I'm happy with a single ( which I'm thinking would be better on the track ) or twins which I could do some pulling with
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 02:28 PM
  #13  
Patriot2500's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,646
Likes: 0
From: montville,nj
Great numbers Ty. Glad to hear the truck is at perfect working order.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #14  
Justice4all's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
How is the spool-up of your Silver Bullet compared to the 64 you had?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 04:25 PM
  #15  
tritont's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by Justice4all
How is the spool-up of your Silver Bullet compared to the 64 you had?
The SB spools great ! The 64 was a little harder to get going but, I think I was over fueling it.

In my experience with turbos, it really depends on the existing mods you have.

This is how i see it...

62/12 or 13 if you want to spool like stock but, have a little more air moved. Basically a stock truck.

64/13 or 14 if you have upgraded fueling and maybe even injectors but, not too big.

66 and up... upgraded fueling is a must and it sure wouldn't hurt to have a few other things done.

These aren't rules of thumb to go by but, kinda close. There are many other factors to keep in mind.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 PM.