3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only) Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for third generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories. THIS IS FOR THE 5.9L ONLY!

Anybody dyno w/ the Crazy Larry program

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 5, 2005 | 08:32 AM
  #1  
Mike S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Brighton, CO
Anybody dyno w/ the Crazy Larry program

Just curious if any one has put there truck on a dyno with this program in it, if so what do you think compared to the TST or any other high hp box or programmer ?? Thanks, Mike
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 11:29 AM
  #2  
PourinDiesel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,352
Likes: 0
From: Southern, Indiana
Piers did a dyno with the CLDL and the TST Twins program and pulled 675rwhp with twins.

I read that on a thread somewhere.
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 11:42 AM
  #3  
RamWheelsBy4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
I believe that Piers said the Crazy Larry by itself with his street/strip twins and cam was 554HP.

Then he said Crazy Larry stacked with TST 7/6 put down 675hp .

That would be ALMOST as good as sex.
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 11:53 AM
  #4  
PourinDiesel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,352
Likes: 0
From: Southern, Indiana
I dont know on that one.
It might be better!
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 03:15 PM
  #5  
RamWheelsBy4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
PourinDiesel,

On second thought I think you are right. Sittin on 675 Cummins HP waiting for my slightest caress, might just be the ultimate adrenaline rush and provide way more satisfaction and gratification than normal old sex.
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 03:22 PM
  #6  
BCarmicle's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, KY
What thread did Piers say he put down 675hp? I did a search on TDR and couldn't find it.

The TST and Crazzy Larry sounds like a lot of timing to me.

Scratch that, I just now found the post.

Brandon
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 03:48 PM
  #7  
Don M's Avatar
DTR Advertiser
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 1
From: In the Shop
The Dyno was a bit inflated! The same truck made 513 with a 6% correction factor using a TST on a DynoJet. Or 483 Raw uncorrected. He did not have the CLDL at that time.

Don~
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 04:18 PM
  #8  
MR4WLR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Don M
The Dyno was a bit inflated! The same truck made 513 with a 6% correction factor using a TST on a DynoJet. Or 483 Raw uncorrected. He did not have the CLDL at that time.

Don~
Was the truck setup EXACTLY the same between the newer runs and the other ones, I doubt he has left it alone
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 04:31 PM
  #9  
RamWheelsBy4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
Here is the thread.

http://www.turbodieselregister.com/f...d.php?t=128853
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 06:58 PM
  #10  
king d's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
i ran the larry and the tst same day and the tst walked all over it and when i stacked them it sounded like a barrel of hammers rolling down a hill...not good
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 07:38 PM
  #11  
sleds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: idaho
The Dyno was a bit inflated! The same truck made 513 with a 6% correction factor using a TST on a DynoJet. Or 483 Raw uncorrected. He did not have the CLDL at that time.

Don~


Yeah, That's it, Piers doesn't know what he's doing.
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 08:39 PM
  #12  
Don M's Avatar
DTR Advertiser
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 1
From: In the Shop
Sleds,

With DynoJet being the dyno that 90 plus percent of people will dyno on...you can get a wildly different outcome using a TST and CLDL with other trucks when compared.

Only a few may show these huge gains with this stack because the CF and the type of dyno differ.

King,

What did you dyno this set up on the DynoJet?

Don~
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 09:20 PM
  #13  
king d's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
yup
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 09:55 PM
  #14  
sleds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: idaho
Don, I agree that all dyno's are differen't and correction factor is a part of figuring hp. What I don't understand is why you think the dyno-jet measures the correct hp from the statement you just made to my reply. The same truck and set-up could dyno on, I don't know how many dyno's, and get differen't results. Bottom line, piers showed what differen't stacks did for hp on the same dyno, same truck.

Agreed?
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 10:35 PM
  #15  
Don M's Avatar
DTR Advertiser
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 1
From: In the Shop
Originally posted by sleds
Don, I agree that all dyno's are differen't and correction factor is a part of figuring hp. What I don't understand is why you think the dyno-jet measures the correct hp from the statement you just made to my reply. The same truck and set-up could dyno on, I don't know how many dyno's, and get differen't results. Bottom line, piers showed what differen't stacks did for hp on the same dyno, same truck.

Agreed?
Yep, Agreed


The problems dont arise until the next guy tries to make it happen for him and he cant make 600.

Don~
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 AM.