Rpm Range
Rpm Range
What RPM range does your truck get the best mileage? This weekend took a 400 mile trip (towing about 5k 200 miles) I noticed that if I keep it around 1800 rpm it would get the best about 17.5 off of the overhead. It seems to me that maybe this new tranny lugs the motor to much, just an idea. I have been trying to keep the truck in 4th gear around town it seems to help a little.
What RPM range does your truck get the best mileage? This weekend took a 400 mile trip (towing about 5k 200 miles) I noticed that if I keep it around 1800 rpm it would get the best about 17.5 off of the overhead. It seems to me that maybe this new tranny lugs the motor to much, just an idea. I have been trying to keep the truck in 4th gear around town it seems to help a little.
Higher RPM or Lower
I'm a bit confused. A lot of people seem to think the tranny lugs and hence not optimal for best mpg. Yet others seem to think that a lower RPM is better and hence they get bigger tires. Does anyone have any real information on if the higher RPM range or lower RPM range is the most ideal for mpg on this truck?
I don't drive this truck that many miles and so far 1/2 of my 1400 only have been towing. Maybe the guys that drive the cr@p out of them and tow for a living would know best?
I don't drive this truck that many miles and so far 1/2 of my 1400 only have been towing. Maybe the guys that drive the cr@p out of them and tow for a living would know best?
All info I told you is directly off cummins engine web page. You beleive what you want. THIS IS CUMMINS INFO
I have played the whole best mpg game at different rpms, different gears. To be honest, these trucks get such horrible mpg as it is stock, dont bother wasting your time changing your rpm habits cause you wont notice any difference..
I have played the whole best mpg game at different rpms, different gears. To be honest, these trucks get such horrible mpg as it is stock, dont bother wasting your time changing your rpm habits cause you wont notice any difference..
All info I told you is directly off cummins engine web page. You beleive what you want. THIS IS CUMMINS INFO
I have played the whole best mpg game at different rpms, different gears. To be honest, these trucks get such horrible mpg as it is stock, dont bother wasting your time changing your rpm habits cause you wont notice any difference..
I have played the whole best mpg game at different rpms, different gears. To be honest, these trucks get such horrible mpg as it is stock, dont bother wasting your time changing your rpm habits cause you wont notice any difference..
So, in theory anyway, less lugging = less particulates = fewer/shorter regens = slightly improved fuel economy.
I don't think Dodge would create the AZ flash just because they're nice guys. To my knowledge there hasn't been a lot of people complaining about bad shift programs, but everyone with a 6.7 is complaining of poor MPG. That tells me (maybe wishful thinking?) that Dodge is looking at every opportunity, no matter how small, to improve MPG by optimizing the emissions system performance. If the AZ flash helps keep the motor running in a more efficient power band too, then so much the better.
I believe that Dodge monitors these types of forums as well as inputs from customer complaints and their dealer network. I believe that Dodge, working with Cummins, will continue to improve the performance, functionality and MPG of the 6.7's. It may be little by little over the next year or two, but they will get this thing optimized.
Trending Topics
All info I told you is directly off cummins engine web page. You beleive what you want. THIS IS CUMMINS INFO
I have played the whole best mpg game at different rpms, different gears. To be honest, these trucks get such horrible mpg as it is stock, dont bother wasting your time changing your rpm habits cause you wont notice any difference..
I have played the whole best mpg game at different rpms, different gears. To be honest, these trucks get such horrible mpg as it is stock, dont bother wasting your time changing your rpm habits cause you wont notice any difference..
The truck is new...2008 Quad cab...6.7 auto...3:73's...less than 1200 miles. I love the power...mileage is at 12.9 actual (pen and paper), which isn't what I hoped for but it's 2+ plus better than the '99 V10 that it replaced. The V10 kept improving until it hit 10K miles...expect that this will do the same. And did I say that I love the power?
Traditionally, the BSFC sweet spot for the CTD has been 1800-1900 RPM... it's possible that it's higher on the new 6.7L due to regen.
BTW - my '98 V10 knocks down 14mpg on the interstate with 250K miles on the engine.
BTW - my '98 V10 knocks down 14mpg on the interstate with 250K miles on the engine.
http://www.powerspec.cummins.com/sit...ng/gearing.htm
put in your parameters and see what you get, 2150 rpms, don't tow below 1900 rpm
put in your parameters and see what you get, 2150 rpms, don't tow below 1900 rpm
I too think that a bit more rpm helps due to less smoke being filtered. In my truck i get better milage from running about 1400 rpm (70-75mph) vs 1250 (60). I think these trucks fuel hard on bottom in order to get the turbo to spool. People with the dpf removed comment on amount of smoke coming from these engines at low boost as being pretty high
Sorry, I don't agree. If you are lugging the engine you are probably creating more black smoke, even if you don't see it coming out of the tailpipe because of the DPF. That means more particulates for the DPF to capture hence it will start to fill up quicker and more often. That means more frequent and possibly longer regens. The biggest reason for reduced MPG compared to the 5.9's (besides larger C.I.) is the fuel injected into the exhaust stroke to raise the exhaust temperature via the catalytic process in the NOx unit. This significant temperature increase is what burns the particulates out of the DPF.
So, in theory anyway, less lugging = less particulates = fewer/shorter regens = slightly improved fuel economy.
I don't think Dodge would create the AZ flash just because they're nice guys. To my knowledge there hasn't been a lot of people complaining about bad shift programs, but everyone with a 6.7 is complaining of poor MPG. That tells me (maybe wishful thinking?) that Dodge is looking at every opportunity, no matter how small, to improve MPG by optimizing the emissions system performance. If the AZ flash helps keep the motor running in a more efficient power band too, then so much the better.
I believe that Dodge monitors these types of forums as well as inputs from customer complaints and their dealer network. I believe that Dodge, working with Cummins, will continue to improve the performance, functionality and MPG of the 6.7's. It may be little by little over the next year or two, but they will get this thing optimized.
So, in theory anyway, less lugging = less particulates = fewer/shorter regens = slightly improved fuel economy.
I don't think Dodge would create the AZ flash just because they're nice guys. To my knowledge there hasn't been a lot of people complaining about bad shift programs, but everyone with a 6.7 is complaining of poor MPG. That tells me (maybe wishful thinking?) that Dodge is looking at every opportunity, no matter how small, to improve MPG by optimizing the emissions system performance. If the AZ flash helps keep the motor running in a more efficient power band too, then so much the better.
I believe that Dodge monitors these types of forums as well as inputs from customer complaints and their dealer network. I believe that Dodge, working with Cummins, will continue to improve the performance, functionality and MPG of the 6.7's. It may be little by little over the next year or two, but they will get this thing optimized.
better mileage at higher rpm's due to the fact that the engine is turning faster but is not working as hard..... there is a limit though....ya know? that sweet spot....you just have to find it.....my c&c doesn't like to go higway anything over 2k rpm's and get over 14....keep it at about 1900 and i'll run 17mpg all day long.....





