3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2007 and up 6.7 liter Engine and Drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

Increase Mileage 25%!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 12:54 PM
  #16  
Hayseed's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: WV
I wonder if I take the bell off a tuba and put it on the front of my truck and run it into the airbox if that would help my MPG's??
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 01:53 PM
  #17  
jkitterman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
What were the specs printed on the stock 6.7 filter?
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 02:46 PM
  #18  
ChrisM55's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: Sparks Nevada
Originally Posted by jkitterman
What were the specs printed on the stock 6.7 filter?
ask and ye shall recieve

53034051ab 101707y2 made in usa dust cap. 775g max airflow. 800 cfm eff99% pressure loss @ max flow 10" rise.
BTW, the new filter is over 4" deep!!! just measured


Scotty, when you gonna hook us up for these 6.7 liters?????

Chris
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 03:39 PM
  #19  
Scotty's Avatar
Top's Younger Twin
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,743
Likes: 21
From: Thanks Don M!
Originally Posted by Hayseed
I wonder if I take the bell off a tuba and put it on the front of my truck and run it into the airbox if that would help my MPG's??
Just make sure you oil the tuba flange first...the road salt will destroy that thing in a few days and it would look like the bell off a clarinet. Try duals. Better yet, run one through the hood and have an intake/velocity stack.


Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 05:43 PM
  #20  
MtnTrucker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Franktown, CO
I'm not accepting you get that kind of MPG increase just by changing from a 6.7 to a 5.9 filter.

What about all of the folks who have put the very high flow after market filters on? They all consistently report an increase in turbo and EB sound levels, but little or no difference in MPG and little difference in performance other than possible crisper throttle response.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 07:33 PM
  #21  
myfirsttruck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Kingston Ontario
3800 miles later - truck has not blown up and mileage is still WAY better than it was.

Laugh all you want......then try it.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 08:53 PM
  #22  
hovisimo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
From: northwestern PA
Originally Posted by myfirsttruck
3800 miles later - truck has not blown up and mileage is still WAY better than it was.

Laugh all you want......then try it.
no one expects it to blow up.

I'll run a couple tanks with a 5.9 filter if I ever get my truck back.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 09:18 PM
  #23  
LFD2037's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Waxahachie
Man, ya'll are tough on this guy. He throws an idea out there & ya'll beat him up about it.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 11:45 PM
  #24  
coalburner400's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
I think its a great idea... I'll wait it out though. I have no choice, my truck aint even assembled yet - still waitin in saltillo
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 11:51 PM
  #25  
Speed Shift's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Originally Posted by nfsommer
i fell off my chair when i saw this thread
laughter sounds
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 11:14 AM
  #26  
trt490's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Snohomish, washington
I agree, way too quick to say it isnt true! we are all looking for ways to get better fuel milage out of these 6.7s, so lets work together to make the trucks better. Milage per gallon on these trucks is going to differ because of the way we drive,terrian ,4.10 vs 373, auto vs stick ect.... just my 2 cents worth!!
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 11:24 AM
  #27  
westexhunt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
5.9 vs 6.7 filter

My opinion. They put a different filter in the 6.7's to trap more of the dirt/etc that gets sucked in. In severe conditions the 5.9 stock air filter was way to liberal in stopping dirt. A friend of mine (cotton farmer) had Dodge warranty his dusted 04 5.9 with a little less than 100k miles. He used Wix air filters and changed them every 5k miles, had proof of purchase for the filters and Dodge covered it.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 03:07 PM
  #28  
capsparky111's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: North East Texas
Hey,I just traded out of a 2001 GMC 8.1 voretc w/ allison and 4.10 rear..... I think the mileage is great compared to 8 and 9 not pulling and 5 and 6 pulling a 40' toyhauler. I get about 15 to 16 mpg not pulling,,,,,, Looking forward to putting the trailer behind it to see what I will get.....


cap
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 05:27 PM
  #29  
hovisimo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
From: northwestern PA
Originally Posted by westexhunt
A friend of mine (cotton farmer) had Dodge warranty his dusted 04 5.9 with a little less than 100k miles. He used Wix air filters and changed them every 5k miles, had proof of purchase for the filters and Dodge covered it.
elaborate on "dusted" please.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 08:17 PM
  #30  
mastercaster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: Leander, TX
i am willing to try this. i thought the 5.9 and 6.7 used the same filter though. is it an earlier 5.9? can someone post the part # for the 6.7 and for the 5.9(the one used for this)? thanks.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 AM.