3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2007 and up 6.7 liter Engine and Drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

Fuel milage 6.7 L. ?

Old Apr 4, 2007 | 12:10 PM
  #16  
62scott's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
mileage

07 6.7 4x4 4door LWB

I am seeing 14.5 city and got 19.2 on first road trip to NM from Tucson with the cruise set at 78. I have a total of 1800 miles on truck tokk delivery 3-22.
Have not been able utilize the engine brake to it fullest extent but will the weekend pulling about 12,000 lb load.

Scott
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #17  
HeavyFuel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 62scott
07 6.7 4x4 4door LWB

I am seeing 14.5 city and got 19.2 on first road trip to NM from Tucson with the cruise set at 78. I have a total of 1800 miles on truck tokk delivery 3-22.
Have not been able utilize the engine brake to it fullest extent but will the weekend pulling about 12,000 lb load.

Scott
You have the 68rfe?

What gears?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 01:33 PM
  #18  
rstone's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: College Station Texas
I am getting around 17-18 on highway with crusie set on 70 I have right at a 1000 miles on it
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 04:31 PM
  #19  
RadRam's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Thanks for the replys - looks like the 6.7 is doing way better than my 6.4 L. for fuel milage.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 03:38 PM
  #20  
zxa's Avatar
zxa
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: quebec,canada
Originally Posted by RadRam
Thanks for the replys - looks like the 6.7 is doing way better than my 6.4 L. for fuel milage.
generaly the i-6 has always been better on the fuel millage....since the beginning!! if you look back in 1989!! the firts 5.9 was better on fuel milage than its competitor at the time..6.2 or 6.9/7.3.....and i don"t think it will be a exception again!!!
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 06:02 PM
  #21  
bigsnakebud's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
WOW, I have not got my new truck yet and I am already in lust.
Fred
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 07:29 PM
  #22  
heinzy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver; B.C.
Originally Posted by RadRam
I m in the process of buying an 07 6.7 l 3500 4x4 Megacab for the wife two questions

1) - What fuel milage # s are people seeing - Real #s
2) - Are the problems with the 6.7 L worked out ? and dont say there were not problems - my dealer in alberta - had to take back an 07 6.7 cab & chas. truck do to problems they - dealer - dc could not fix.

Thanks
1)Thats exactly the truck I have ( + 4X4 etc) = 17,3 ltr/100km.
Mind you , that's only in town so far, not even 100 clicks on it.

Considering my Voyageur gulped ~ >12 ltrs ...
2)Truck is just grrrreat ...

Ahhm, re .extended warranty : apparently on the 16th of this month , the bumper to bumper warranty gets bumped up CAN $1400 in price so it would run ~ CAN $ 4.800. Yikes.( I actually saw the note from DaimlerChrysler to the dealer)
So to get me an extra 4 years of peace of mind ( year 4/5/6/+7) I have to come up with , and fork over ~ CAN $3.400 in the next few days .. Yikes again..
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 08:39 PM
  #23  
eb290's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: South Texas
I am still waiting for someone to tell me what the problem supposedly was on those two trucks that supposedly couldn't be fixed. I really have to wonder when someone just pops up a problem but never gives any specifics.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 06:38 PM
  #24  
RadRam's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
I will find out tomorrow - the dealer here still has the truck.

Alright was at the dealer today - they have had a few techs out to try to get the truck to run right, according to the salesman - they have tried 3 different computors -( his words ) in it and still cant get it to run right, a welder owned it for a short time before the dealer took it back - he took a 5.9 L. as he needs a reliable truck. The truck will only get 3 mpg & wont run right.

They have another tech comming out this week to trouble shoot the 6.7 L.
I suggested that maybe it had the old fuel ( non ulsd)- mabe plugged the DPF. But im sure they would have checked that.

On a differant note - I test drove another 07 6.7 L. megacab 3500 4x4 - drove it on the hwy for 25 miles the overhead showed 19.6 - 20.1 MPG @ 100 km/hr average thats the highest mpg reading of any cummins I have personally drove ! Im impressed if thats right or even close.

Last edited by RadRam; Apr 11, 2007 at 08:09 PM. Reason: Update
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 09:14 AM
  #25  
62scott's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by HeavyFuel
You have the 68rfe?

What gears?
I have the 373 gears with the 68rfe. as a side note my 2500 came with the 11.5 rearend (1 ton) instead of the 10.5 the 2500 normally comes with. The dealer was not able to explain why but thought it could be cause of the extra tourqe the 6.7 is putting out. I showed 13.2 mpg pulling the backhoe this last weekend in some hilly country and the engine brake was a plus.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 09:19 AM
  #26  
62scott's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by rstone
I am getting around 17-18 on highway with crusie set on 70 I have right at a 1000 miles on it
my numbers are similar to yours with the same setup!
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 10:01 AM
  #27  
morkable's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,426
Likes: 1
From: Fort McMurray, Alberta
they all come with the 11.5, even my 03 has a 11.5. The only difference between a 2500 and 3500 is a spring leaf. and about 350 - 500 dollars.

Red ram,, just so you know, the gallons that are computed in the overhead are us gallons, much smaller than our imperial gallons, so it puts the overhead out of whack if you try to read the MPG.

The MPG that you guys are getting is IMO very good for trucks with only 1000 to 10000 miles on them, they usually will get better around 15k or so. I have a duramax besides my 03, and I am getting 13mpg, and that is pussyfooting it

Kevin
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 10:33 AM
  #28  
Duallydog's Avatar
Chapter President
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
From: Big Spring (now Stephenville), Tx
It's looking like the 6.7's aren't the fuel hogs you would think with bigger displacement and about everything ever done for emissions on it.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 03:15 PM
  #29  
62scott's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by morkable
they all come with the 11.5, even my 03 has a 11.5. The only difference between a 2500 and 3500 is a spring leaf. and about 350 - 500 dollars.

Red ram,, just so you know, the gallons that are computed in the overhead are us gallons, much smaller than our imperial gallons, so it puts the overhead out of whack if you try to read the MPG.

The MPG that you guys are getting is IMO very good for trucks with only 1000 to 10000 miles on them, they usually will get better around 15k or so. I have a duramax besides my 03, and I am getting 13mpg, and that is pussyfooting it

Kevin
For some reason my 4x4 2005 2500 5.9 only has the 10.5 axle
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 06:24 AM
  #30  
Red Ram Man's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
The Dealer is now telling me that these trucks ARE NOT TO DRIVEN LIGHTLY ..they are NO GOOD for short trips at all. My 2007 has 3500 miles on it and this is my 3rd time back to the dealership to get it de-sooted...reflashed and who knows what. If your going to work a truck hard THIS IS A GOOD TRUCK ENGINE. THIS IS NOT A LIGHT DUTY TRUCK!!! I wish I never traded my 5.9 in.
Bud
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 AM.