3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

Megacab Mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2006 | 01:30 PM
  #1  
drakeslayer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Megacab Mileage

Wanted to see what kind of mileage other 2500 Megacab 4X4 autos were getting. I have 3.73's. I'm getting an average of 13. Love the truck but wish the mileage was a little better. It's my first diesel, what kind of improvements can I look for when it breaks in?
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 01:45 PM
  #2  
truckjunkie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis Metro Area, MO
There's a TON of posts/threads about this. Do a search on the site and you'll have more varying accounts of mileage than you know what to do with.

That said, the general consensus is that the engine is broken in around 20K miles or so, give or take a few thousand depending on how hard you work it. With 29K on mine (see signature - and you should fill out yours too), I see:

15-16 all city driving
16-17 mainly city / some highway driving
18-19 mainly highway driving (under 75)
16-17 mainly highway driving (75 or over)

There doesn't seem to be a lot of mileage difference between the 48RE and NV5600 trannies. The mileage from the new G56 manual is a little bit lower.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 03:33 PM
  #3  
drakeslayer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
I've read many but wanted a better comparison with other Megacabs.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 04:35 PM
  #4  
1stdodge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Mountain Top PA
drakeslayer, I also have a Mega Cab CTD with a auto 3.73. When I first bought the truck in February, I was getting 11.4 mpg. Mileage has been slowly going up, to a point where I am now averaging around 14.5. I am not sure how much I picked-up going off of winter diesel........so maybe I increased 2 MPG in 3500 miles.
A lot of people do say that you need 15 to 20K to get peak mileage. I don't know why it would take so long, but apparently it does. I have a brother with a Quad Cab CTD and he is now getting 17 mpg (with 20k miles) vs. 13 mpg when new.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 06:49 PM
  #5  
mlaux's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
I have 1200mi on mine and I'm getting 18.4 had calculated. The overhead reports about 2mpg high.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 11:03 PM
  #6  
TRC51's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 1stdodge
drakeslayer, I also have a Mega Cab CTD with a auto 3.73. When I first bought the truck in February, I was getting 11.4 mpg. Mileage has been slowly going up, to a point where I am now averaging around 14.5. I am not sure how much I picked-up going off of winter diesel........so maybe I increased 2 MPG in 3500 miles.
A lot of people do say that you need 15 to 20K to get peak mileage. I don't know why it would take so long, but apparently it does. I have a brother with a Quad Cab CTD and he is now getting 17 mpg (with 20k miles) vs. 13 mpg when new.
Almost identical to what I am getting with the 3:73's and 48re. Getting better quickly it seems... which is nice. If I don't see much improvement over the 14.7 average I am getting now after about 8kmi or so, I may look into the flash for milage. Until then I am not jumping to conclusions.

Note: 6spd drivers tend to better on mileage, so don't be disheartened when you see them posting bigger numbers. They short shift and keep the engine out of the turbo.... especially beneficial around town where the auto gets to be pigish.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 07:28 AM
  #7  
djbikeman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
From: Omaha
Originally Posted by truckjunkie

15-16 all city driving
16-17 mainly city / some highway driving
18-19 mainly highway driving (under 75)
16-17 mainly highway driving (75 or over)

There doesn't seem to be a lot of mileage difference between the 48RE and NV5600 trannies. The mileage from the new G56 manual is a little bit lower.
That's what I get...

The mileage is better with the NV5600, but not with the G56, at least at highway speeds. The G56 runs lower gears which cause higher RPM's at highway speeds.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 01:32 PM
  #8  
TMan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Texas
If you search for my posts on the subject they are all accurate.

I get an average of around 14.

I have gotten as high as 16 on all highway kepping rpm's below 2000.


If I am towing my open car trailer with my car on it, my mileage is around 13mpg.

I needed a new truck and fell for the diesel bs that everyone gets 20+ mpg towing a million pounds into a 50mph headwind.


Now I know the truth.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 05:48 PM
  #9  
beretzs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Do you all think the manuals turn in a little better mileage because they are always "locked". Meaning, even though a G56 is a little lower geared it is directly linked to the engine, and there is no wasted slippage. Just wondering if that could be part of the reason. I constantly see on here and other sites, the manuals always average better than the autos. Not trying to get into which is better and I know the TC locks "almost" all the time, but there are still alot of times it will unlock and need more peddle, than say a manual, that just stays in gear and puts the power down. Scotty
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 09:16 PM
  #10  
John_C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
The '03s get better mileage in all configurations as they are 4 gram NOX engines vs. the 04.5 and later at 2.5 NOX.

I got 20 MPG over 1600 miles on a trip to New Orleans to srtip out houses several wkks ago, and get 13.5 towing a 10K 5-er at 68 MPH on the Interstate.

John C
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 06:36 AM
  #11  
dogger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: South TX
Originally Posted by beretzs
Do you all think the manuals turn in a little better mileage because they are always "locked". Scotty
An automatic transmission is still a fluid drive and although they are getting closer to flywheel speed = 100% input transmission shaft speed, they are not there yet. With a manual what the flywheel is turning the input shaft is turning unless the clutch is slipping. There are probably a few less mechanical losses with the manual so hence they are slightly more efficient if they are driven properly. Greater efficiency is greater mileage.

L8R,..............dogger
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 06:47 AM
  #12  
essgeetee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 1
From: Arlington, Texas
Originally Posted by TMan
If you search for my posts on the subject they are all accurate.

I get an average of around 14.

I have gotten as high as 16 on all highway kepping rpm's below 2000.


If I am towing my open car trailer with my car on it, my mileage is around 13mpg.

I needed a new truck and fell for the diesel bs that everyone gets 20+ mpg towing a million pounds into a 50mph headwind.


Now I know the truth.
Well, it used to be close to true... The craptastic gas mileage didn't happen until 06. Also for the sake of the thread I don't think quadcab/megacab would be a huge difference in MPG.
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 07:24 AM
  #13  
C4 Max's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Mine has been steady at 13.5 or so. Mostly around town. My first pull this weekend with a 7000 lb. travel trailer in the mountains of AZ. We'll see how she does.
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 07:37 AM
  #14  
Mcmopar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,833
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by dogger
An automatic transmission is still a fluid drive and although they are getting closer to flywheel speed = 100% input transmission shaft speed, they are not there yet.
L8R,..............dogger
With the advent of the lockup converter you had better have 100% lockup or your lockup clutch and transmission will be toast in a few days of driving this way!! The OD in the auto is "taller" than in the G56 so you will get better highway mileage with the auto. The NV5600 is a has been in the Dodge.
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 10:51 AM
  #15  
shortbus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Originally Posted by Mcmopar
With the advent of the lockup converter you had better have 100% lockup or your lockup clutch and transmission will be toast in a few days of driving this way!! The OD in the auto is "taller" than in the G56 so you will get better highway mileage with the auto. The NV5600 is a has been in the Dodge.

WOW, somebody finally understands how a torque converter works...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NDS
4th Gen Ram -Non Drivetrain- 2010 and Up
4
Apr 29, 2010 06:50 PM
slowstang232
General Diesel Discussion
38
Mar 31, 2008 08:23 AM
Kman9090
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
1
Sep 19, 2006 11:25 AM
GatorRam
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
13
Apr 20, 2006 12:35 AM
TxDiesel007
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
17
Jan 17, 2006 02:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 AM.