Looking to buy 05 2WD 6 Spd. Mileage ? Towing ? Questions...
Expect no higher than 18.5-19 on the truck you described, and that is running 72-75 on the highway. You can make the numbers better if you drive 60-65 but even the fords and chevys will pass you at that speed.
Does anyone on this board have a 2WD, Gen3 6 speed ? If so, how is it for fuel economy ?
12k on the clock, the computer tends to say 18. Improves on the freeway when I'm under 70 (2k rpm's, no faster, seems the best mpg), I've watched it hover 20-22 on I-5.
Tim
Originally posted by CMC
I still only have 460 miles on mine and the compter says I'm getting 17 mpg. Thats a mix of city and highway. It should only get better. No issues with the hydroboost and the G 56 shifts very smooth. It seems to be getting better with milage. i am very happy with the truck! At 65 MPH I am right at 2,000 RPM. i think that she will pull all day at that speed.
I still only have 460 miles on mine and the compter says I'm getting 17 mpg. Thats a mix of city and highway. It should only get better. No issues with the hydroboost and the G 56 shifts very smooth. It seems to be getting better with milage. i am very happy with the truck! At 65 MPH I am right at 2,000 RPM. i think that she will pull all day at that speed.
SuperDuty,
To answer the question about the fan clutch... The fan is powered by a viscous coupling, which always provides some amount of torque to the fan. But instead of the usual bi-metallic clockspring providing increased torque transmission with high heat, the PCM controls the application of the clutch. The benefit is that the fan always spins, so when the clutch engages, there is less wear than if the fan was stationary. Also, the fan shroud is mounted to the engine rather than the back of the radiator. This allows tighter tolerances between the fan tips and the shroud, for better airflow.
I'm sure someone does (or could) make a controller for the fan. But honestly, I doubt you'd need it. If you're looking to increase engine braking by forcing the fan on, you'd get much better gains with an exhaust brake. Also, don't forget that the PCM will probably lock up the fan during the uphill climb anyways. It will most likely take the decent to bring coolant temps back down, and trigger the PCM to release the fan clutch.
To answer the question about the fan clutch... The fan is powered by a viscous coupling, which always provides some amount of torque to the fan. But instead of the usual bi-metallic clockspring providing increased torque transmission with high heat, the PCM controls the application of the clutch. The benefit is that the fan always spins, so when the clutch engages, there is less wear than if the fan was stationary. Also, the fan shroud is mounted to the engine rather than the back of the radiator. This allows tighter tolerances between the fan tips and the shroud, for better airflow.
I'm sure someone does (or could) make a controller for the fan. But honestly, I doubt you'd need it. If you're looking to increase engine braking by forcing the fan on, you'd get much better gains with an exhaust brake. Also, don't forget that the PCM will probably lock up the fan during the uphill climb anyways. It will most likely take the decent to bring coolant temps back down, and trigger the PCM to release the fan clutch.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mxmike27
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
3
Nov 5, 2009 03:00 PM



