3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

Cheapest Route For Changing Gear Ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2013 | 10:51 AM
  #1  
EdmontonCanada's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Cheapest Route For Changing Gear Ratio

If I decide to change from 3.73 to 4.10 in my 06 4x4, would it be cheaper to get the 4.10 axels from a wrecking yard and swap them out or pay a drivetrain shop to install new internals?

And if going with new internals, are there any upgrades with the LSD I should consider?
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2013 | 01:13 PM
  #2  
PistacheYo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Edmonton Canada, I am actually looking to go from a 4.10 to a 3.53. From my research a ring and pinion is about $500/ axle or $3000 installed. I did not look into the scrap yard. I am opting to swap the ring and pinion myself, that's mostly due to being cheap.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2013 | 04:14 PM
  #3  
pronstar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
I'm not sure about the exchange rate, but...wow, that's pricey.

I had mine done by a mobile guy that comes to you, front and rear re-gear, $1,150 USD.

I'd say a boneyard and doing the work yourself is always gonna be your best bet, regardless, as far as cost goes.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2013 | 06:20 PM
  #4  
EdmontonCanada's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Yeah, I was quoted about $3k including parts. I was told the setting up of the teeth to run 100% true is most the cost (labour).

Too bad you weren't looking for a 3.71 pistachYo...if you were closer we could swap.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2013 | 09:59 PM
  #5  
PistacheYo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by EdmontonCanada
Yeah, I was quoted about $3k including parts. I was told the setting up of the teeth to run 100% true is most the cost (labour).

Too bad you weren't looking for a 3.71 pistachYo...if you were closer we could swap.
EC , I am looking into the possibility of running a 3.71, saving a grand in parts is always a bonus.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 01:35 PM
  #6  
SOhappy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 10
From: Udaho
Cheapest route might be:
1. Sell existing truck.
2. Buy truck with the gear ratio you want.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 01:40 PM
  #7  
madhat's Avatar
Administrator/Jarhead
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 15,017
Likes: 40
From: Jonesborough, TN
3. Get taller tires.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 05:00 PM
  #8  
SOhappy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 10
From: Udaho
Originally Posted by madhat
3. Get taller tires.
Ohhhhh! I think I like that one the best!!
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 05:07 PM
  #9  
madhat's Avatar
Administrator/Jarhead
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 15,017
Likes: 40
From: Jonesborough, TN
Sad, but true!
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2013 | 08:26 AM
  #10  
marathon's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 200
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
I may have this bass ackwards, but isn't going to a taller tire, from 265 to
315, like changing rear axle ratio from 4.10 to 3.73? Fewer revolutions for tire per RPM of engine? If you want to go in the opposite direction, go with a smaller tire.

The loss of mpg for taller tires is mostly due to larger rotating mass and wind resistance of the tire (wider) and body lift?
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2013 | 01:12 PM
  #11  
SOhappy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 10
From: Udaho
Originally Posted by marathon
I may have this bass ackwards, but isn't going to a taller tire, from 265 to
315, like changing rear axle ratio from 4.10 to 3.73? Fewer revolutions for tire per RPM of engine? If you want to go in the opposite direction, go with a smaller tire.

The loss of mpg for taller tires is mostly due to larger rotating mass and wind resistance of the tire (wider) and body lift?
Yes, you're right- smaller tire would "gear it down". Not many choices going smaller, and it would look stupid.

In my opinion, in general, taller tires return worse mpgs because of more rolling resistance because they get (more than) proportionally wider too.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2013 | 02:25 PM
  #12  
EdmontonCanada's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Not selling the truck. Too custom to start over. I have 35 inch tires and don't want to go smaller to get the RPM back.

In terms of the amount of driving that I do, changing gears is best - make the $ back in a couple years.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2013 | 04:28 PM
  #13  
pronstar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
...delete...sorry
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2013 | 08:03 PM
  #14  
madhat's Avatar
Administrator/Jarhead
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 15,017
Likes: 40
From: Jonesborough, TN
My fault... I read the post wrong.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2013 | 04:39 AM
  #15  
Steve-l's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 361
Likes: 3
From: Germany
You must be drag racing............because otherwise, it makes no sense. I have 4.10s and if you drive freeways at all, the engine really spins up way too much. The ideal speed with 4.10s is 55 mph. Anything more than that and your fuel consumption rises exponentially. When I mount the Alcoas, my effective gear drops to a 3.6x and my ideal speed becomes 70 mph.........your call.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 PM.