3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

Calculating Revs per Mile

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 05:44 PM
  #1  
IsItFast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: KC
Calculating Revs per Mile

So I got some 22.5" wheels on my truck and the speedo is obviously off. I am taking the truck to the dealer tomorrow for an alignment so I figure I will get the speedo calibrated too while I'm there....hopefully they will do it.

I have 255/70/22.5 tires which, according to Yokohama are 36.8" tall and have 567 Revs per mile. Should I go off of this figure or should I manually calculate it myself? If so, is there a good thread on this? I couldn't seem to find a thread that specifically states how.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 05:56 PM
  #2  
Joe N.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Longview, TX
The dealer that recalibrated my speedometer didn't want to use the numbers I gave him from BFG. They had a chart, looked at my tire size, and programmed what the chart said. I don't know if the numbers from BFG would have been any closer but the speedometer indicates about 1 to 1.5 MPH fast. Speed has been checked by radar and my GPS unit.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 06:46 PM
  #3  
bulabula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
From: Eastern & Western Merryland
Originally Posted by IsItFast
So I got some 22.5" wheels on my truck and the speedo is obviously off. I am taking the truck to the dealer tomorrow for an alignment so I figure I will get the speedo calibrated too while I'm there....hopefully they will do it.

I have 255/70/22.5 tires which, according to Yokohama are 36.8" tall and have 567 Revs per mile. Should I go off of this figure or should I manually calculate it myself? If so, is there a good thread on this? I couldn't seem to find a thread that specifically states how.
I'd go with what Yokohama said - they've made plenty of tires by now, so I figure they know how to calculate revs/mile.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 10:29 PM
  #4  
J BODY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,654
Likes: 2
I've used the numbers provided by customers from BFG's website and sometimes we were still off. Best bet is to beg, borrow, or steal a GPS unit. That's my prefered method.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 12:23 AM
  #5  
IsItFast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: KC
How do you calculate revs with GPS? I have a GPS radar that tells my speed...
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 07:57 AM
  #6  
oldschool's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
You can calculate the circumference (distance around the outside) of a circle (tire) pretty easily. The formula is C = PI(3.14) * d(diameter)

There are 63,360 inches in a mile...using this we can figure it out.

So what you need to do is measure the height of the tire and plug it into this equation. In my example I'm going to use a 32" tall tire

C = 3.14 * 32
C = 100.48 (distance around the outside of the tire)

To go 1 mile the tire must go around
63,360/100.48 = 630.57 times.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 09:57 PM
  #7  
tands1000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by oldschool
You can calculate the circumference (distance around the outside) of a circle (tire) pretty easily. The formula is C = PI(3.14) * d(diameter)

There are 63,360 inches in a mile...using this we can figure it out.

So what you need to do is measure the height of the tire and plug it into this equation. In my example I'm going to use a 32" tall tire

C = 3.14 * 32
C = 100.48 (distance around the outside of the tire)

To go 1 mile the tire must go around
63,360/100.48 = 630.57 times.
I tried this method and it didnt work. I have 35x12.50x17 procomp mud tires. They are actually about 34" though. With that calculation, you get about 593 revs. WAY OFF. I finally got it set at 628 revs and that is about 1-2 mph off using a radar. This method may work for some however. Just didnt on mine.

Travis
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 10:31 PM
  #8  
drew03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Originally Posted by Joe N.
The dealer that recalibrated my speedometer didn't want to use the numbers I gave him from BFG. They had a chart, looked at my tire size, and programmed what the chart said. I don't know if the numbers from BFG would have been any closer but the speedometer indicates about 1 to 1.5 MPH fast. Speed has been checked by radar and my GPS unit.
They used the number that i gave them (601) from BFG and mine is dead on.


however i did the math backwards and came up with an overall diameter of 33.55"
When calculating with the 3.14 (PI) *34.5/(5280*12) =584.58 revs/mile
interesting isint it. according to there number it is only 33.5" tall, when they say it is 34.5".
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 10:32 PM
  #9  
gsbrockman's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 20
From: Sand Gap, KY.
Originally Posted by oldschool
You can calculate the circumference (distance around the outside) of a circle (tire) pretty easily. The formula is C = PI(3.14) * d(diameter)

There are 63,360 inches in a mile...using this we can figure it out.

So what you need to do is measure the height of the tire and plug it into this equation. In my example I'm going to use a 32" tall tire

C = 3.14 * 32
C = 100.48 (distance around the outside of the tire)

To go 1 mile the tire must go around
63,360/100.48 = 630.57 times.
..........or you could utilize part of this equation and change a small part of it.
Using some children's sidewalk chalk, or a tire/grease crayon, mark the tire in the tread area, drive the truck one tire revolution, and measure the distance center-to-center between the chalk/crayon marks. Divide 63,360 by the distance measured....this will account for the static loaded radius of the tire, and should be a tad more accurate.
Greg
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 10:41 PM
  #10  
IsItFast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: KC
Well I just gave them the number Yoko provided and the tech said it was almost perfect between mile markers...but you never know how acurate those markers are. I haven't had a chance to check it versus GPS yet but it feels much closer compared to traffic.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 10:42 PM
  #11  
drew03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Originally Posted by maynard3
..........or you could utilize part of this equation and change a small part of it.
Using some children's sidewalk chalk, or a tire/grease crayon, mark the tire in the tread area, drive the truck one tire revolution, and measure the distance center-to-center between the chalk/crayon marks. Divide 63,360 by the distance measured....this will account for the static loaded radius of the tire, and should be a tad more accurate.
Greg
or jack it up and use a tape measure.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 10:16 AM
  #12  
HeberRam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Heber, Utah
Question screw getting dirty, and using math

Just use this handy link and save brain power and getting dirty

http://www.1010tires.com/TireSizeCalculator.asp
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 10:55 AM
  #13  
SkyHarborCowboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Stanfield, Arizona
You cant go by the diameter of the tire. You must take into account the loaded weight on the tire. If you want to use the diameter you MUST measure from the ground to the center of the hub with the vehicles tires on the ground. You then double this to achieve your loaded tire diameter.

2(Loaded Tire Radius) X Pi = True Rolling Diameter

Joe

That is if you want to be truly accurate!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
C Minus
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
12
Apr 21, 2008 06:21 PM
SmokinDodge12V
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
1
Jun 20, 2006 06:39 PM
Jmac
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
7
Feb 12, 2006 12:35 PM
rjm022
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
2
Jan 14, 2005 06:42 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 AM.