1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

Head Porting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 06:33 PM
  #1  
Mike T.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Head Porting

Any info out there on how you should port a cummins head? I've done some cleanup on sb chevy heads in my younger days but I think it's different, right? Anyway I can't seem to find anything on how to for the cummins. Any info out there?

Thanks
Mike
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 07:42 PM
  #2  
jimbo486's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 114
From: Orange County, California
a common recommendation is to gasket match the ports. that way you know both the exhaust manifold and head yield the same dimensions without having to guess.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 07:52 PM
  #3  
Mike T.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Thanks Jim,
I'm also assuming you should open up the exhaust bowls,a bit too right?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 07:57 PM
  #4  
jimbo486's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 114
From: Orange County, California
yeah, i have no knowledge of to what extent but i have heard of guys opening both the exhaust and intake bowls. of course, you'd need the head off in order to remove the valves and do just that.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 08:16 PM
  #5  
BC847's Avatar
1st Generation Admin
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 118
From: Buies Creek, NC
From the old PDR website:

Name:  porthead1_lg.jpg
Views: 3345
Size:  38.1 KB


Just as an FYI, this is that hump in the way of #1's intake feed:

Name:  cut3.jpg
Views: 2842
Size:  84.8 KB

Name:  cut2.jpg
Views: 2990
Size:  74.1 KB


Hope this helps.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 08:28 PM
  #6  
Mike T.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Looks tight in there. Thanks David
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 08:33 PM
  #7  
BC847's Avatar
1st Generation Admin
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 118
From: Buies Creek, NC
Unless you're cutting off the intake log, then you're left with cleaning up the intake bowls.

Name:  IntakeBowl.jpg
Views: 2168
Size:  74.4 KB



Else, it looks like straightening up the exhaust port.

Name:  ExhaustIn.jpg
Views: 2941
Size:  61.7 KB



Notice the exhaust port is not gasket matched. I think such goes toward keeping exhaust gas velocities up.

Name:  ExhaustOut.jpg
Views: 2066
Size:  70.9 KB



Consider getting your valves back-cut also.

Name:  ValveProfile.jpg
Views: 2136
Size:  21.2 KB
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 08:56 PM
  #8  
Mike T.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
I don't understand the reason why you would not gasket match the exhaust side, doesn't that hinder the flow?
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 05:37 AM
  #9  
Mike T.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
"Notice the exhaust port is not gasket matched. I think such goes toward keeping exhaust gas velocities up."

After thinking about it I see the point. Thanks again for the pics
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 04:33 PM
  #10  
big stinky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver island
BC, I wish I had of seen those pics last week But thanks!
I went with a basic bowl blend/cleanup with mine. Huge improvement on the short side of the runner. I was afraid of going too far because of head structure, and water, but those pics are worth 1000 words...


Mike T: If your running the stock manifold, they shrink, I used the soot line as a guide to open the ports up.

Does anybody make a reduced stem valve for these heads? cant remember the exact name for them...
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 06:37 PM
  #11  
mhuppertz's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,053
Likes: 135
From: Tijeras, New Mexico, 7,000ft up
Notes:
In a naturally aspirated gasser, the short side radius is critical to keep from creating a low pressure right before the inlet that causes the fuel to come out of suspension. Also in a net asp gasser, you want to leave the "as-cast" surface to keep port velocities up (think golf ball).
On a pressurized engine, you want the ports as large, open and smooth as you can get them. You can see this looking at a carbureted HEMI head versus one prepped for a blower motor.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 09:06 PM
  #12  
BC847's Avatar
1st Generation Admin
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 118
From: Buies Creek, NC
Something to also consider:

How much time do our engines run at WOT boost?

- The less forced induction, the more natural induction. (We just don't have to worry about keeping the fuel entrained as in the case of a gasser).

Certainly a larger pipe is gonna flow more, but that's also just that much more we have to pressurize, hence, Lag.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 09:46 PM
  #13  
mhuppertz's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,053
Likes: 135
From: Tijeras, New Mexico, 7,000ft up
You gotta remember that there is no throttle body, so every time a piston sweeps the volume with the intake valve open you get a large volume of air moving through the inlet (and out of the exhaust). So with a diesel, smooth, unrestricted flow is even more important. As far as lag, it might take a split second longer to pressurize a larger exhaust volume if the restriction on the end is the save size as before (the exhuast housing in the turbo).
But I promise you if I turn out to be all wrong about this I will fess up!
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 05:44 AM
  #14  
KD93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
From: West Palm Beach, Florida
Originally Posted by mhuppertz
Notes:
In a naturally aspirated gasser, the short side radius is critical to keep from creating a low pressure right before the inlet that causes the fuel to come out of suspension. Also in a net asp gasser, you want to leave the "as-cast" surface to keep port velocities up (think golf ball).
On a pressurized engine, you want the ports as large, open and smooth as you can get them. You can see this looking at a carbureted HEMI head versus one prepped for a blower motor.
I thought we still need some rough areas to create turbulence though? If there's no 'swirl', the droplets of fuel will remain relatively large. Especially if we increase injector size! Ok, so the crown will help create turbulence, but there is still going to be unburnt fuel in there = inefficient combustion = not realising full heat potential = wasted $$$, (that was a mouthful!)
I'm not questioning you, Mhuppertz, I'm just trying to get this straight. We're learning all this stuff in school, so I want to understand it. I need to get it through my head !!
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 07:38 AM
  #15  
CaptainChrysler's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 6
From: Ida Grove, IA
Everyone I have talked to stresses swirl. If you reduce or mess up the swirl it leads to reversion up the intake side.

Mainly you want to open up the valve pockets. I opened up the exhaust ports, too. We are shooting for high RPM power rather than low end spool up though.

I just got done doing one for the puller, my first experience at head porting. I spend probably 40-50 hours on it. It just takes time and practice. The next one will be faster. I used 6" long carbides, then a Standard Abrasives kits to smooth it up.

Name:  IMG_0046.jpg
Views: 2031
Size:  103.6 KB

Name:  IMG_0048.jpg
Views: 2723
Size:  67.9 KB

Name:  IMG_0041.jpg
Views: 2412
Size:  91.8 KB

Name:  IMG_0049.jpg
Views: 2192
Size:  71.4 KB
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45 PM.