1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

Diving in - porting the head

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 09:59 AM
  #16  
goodtyms's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Area
Originally Posted by crossy
personally , i dont call that 'MILD' head porting. He's got some time invested there. JMHO. DAVE
It's "mild" because I didn't remove too much material in the head, not because it didn't take time - it did! I'm trying to stay away from the water jackets and also not get the wall thickness too thin at key stress points, like where the manifold bolts to the head, a known area for cracking.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 11:04 AM
  #17  
BC847's Avatar
1st Generation Admin
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 118
From: Buies Creek, NC
IIRC, you may find the exhaust housing flange of the manifold will only need cleaning up in the top and bottom to mate nicely to the turbo's housing.
The center divider is pretty much dead on and the outer side-walls just need aligning. The shorter sides (top and bottom) need the most work to line them up with the turbo.
Any more will result in you trumpeting the manifold, only to have to do the same thing to the turbo's housing. A LOT of work for nothing IMO as you'll introduce turbulence that will hinder smooth gas flow.

Seems I recall there's a boss in the heads intake log up close to cylinder no1 that offers resistance to flow as compared to the other cylinders.


I'll see if I can find the article about it............



Looking good thus far goodtyms.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 12:32 PM
  #18  
Boatnik's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,309
Likes: 26
From: Smithfield, VA
Originally Posted by BC847
IIRC, you may find the exhaust housing flange of the manifold will only need cleaning up in the top and bottom to mate nicely to the turbo's housing.
The center divider is pretty much dead on and the outer side-walls just need aligning. The shorter sides (top and bottom) need the most work to line them up with the turbo.
Any more will result in you trumpeting the manifold, only to have to do the same thing to the turbo's housing. A LOT of work for nothing IMO as you'll introduce turbulence that will hinder smooth gas flow.

Seems I recall there's a boss in the heads intake log up close to cylinder no1 that offers resistance to flow as compared to the other cylinders.


I'll see if I can find the article about it............



Looking good thus far goodtyms.
When I match ported the 16cm housing to the stock exhaust manifold, which originally had a 21cm housing, I only needed to remove material from the exhaust housing flange and lightly buff the manifold to match the gasket. What you have done looks good. IMHO anything that can be done to make air flow easier should help. After all it is just a big air pump, isn't it? It may not yield a significant horsepower change but your egt's might drop and so might the smoke.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 07:01 PM
  #19  
goodtyms's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Area
Head Gasket Thickness

Okay, for those those of you that followed and especially contributed to my this thread, thanks!

Here's more pictures right before the head went to the machine shop . They finishing milling and took .010" off the head to get it true again and are grinding the valves, just because I was in there porting and did it as good measure. Anyway, I've heard of people installing the .020" headgasket to prevent detonation (in a diesel of all things ) when planning other mods.

I plan on minor pump mods, 190 "ish" injectors, porting of course, turbo-back 4" exhaust (all I need is the downpipe) the HX35 that's on there and no more than 32-35 PSI of boost. Should I go with the .010" or the .020" head gasket?

Is lowering compression by using a taller gasket only needed when twin are used or other extreme mods?

Exhaust port before porting:



Exhaust port after polishing:
(I know about boundry layers, I'm just trying to keep soot from accumulating)



Exhaust bowl after polishing:


Surface rust is from damp compressor air...lots, and lots of it!
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 07:08 PM
  #20  
G1625S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,767
Likes: 5
From: port crane, NY
Lowering the compression is a side-effect of the .020 gasket. The real benefit is that there's now room for more air (.020XpiXsomethingXsomething....), making it easier to burn all the fuel you're likely to add The downside is harder cold starting.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 09:21 PM
  #21  
flashgordon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 1
From: WY
(I know about boundry layers, I'm just trying to keep soot from accumulating)




I don't, enlighten me!.....Please

Pic look grate, man you have got a lot of hours tide up in that head! ready to do a nether one? just kidding
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 05:12 PM
  #22  
wannadiesel's Avatar
Adminstrator-ess
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 19
From: New Holland, PA
Go with the 0.020 gasket. You're throwing a lot more fuel in there than Cummins was planning on, and probably with more timing too.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 08:16 AM
  #23  
goodtyms's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Area
Injector height/spacing

Originally Posted by wannadiesel
Go with the 0.020 gasket. You're throwing a lot more fuel in there than Cummins was planning on, and probably with more timing too.
Will using a different thickness headgasket require different thickness injector washers? I understand that injector height affects the spray patern, or is .010" trivial for injector spacing?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 08:29 AM
  #24  
goodtyms's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Area
Originally Posted by flashgordon
(I know about boundry layers, I'm just trying to keep soot from accumulating)




I don't, enlighten me!.....Please

Pic look grate, man you have got a lot of hours tide up in that head! ready to do a nether one? just kidding
Thanks...yes, lots of hours...probably at least 12 hours between the head, manifold and turbo, but I think it wil be worth it. I had three die grinders set up with diffeent tools - carbide cutters, flap sanders and cartidge rolls so I could switch back and forth quickly.

My understanding is that having a slightly rough surface (80grit) keeps the main part of flow away from the walls resulting in less restriction. After looking at how much soot was built up, I decided to make 'em shine.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 11:43 AM
  #25  
flashgordon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 1
From: WY
Originally Posted by goodtyms
Thanks...yes, lots of hours...probably at least 12 hours between the head, manifold and turbo, but I think it wil be worth it. I had three die grinders set up with diffeent tools - carbide cutters, flap sanders and cartidge rolls so I could switch back and forth quickly.

My understanding is that having a slightly rough surface (80grit) keeps the main part of flow away from the walls resulting in less restriction. After looking at how much soot was built up, I decided to make 'em shine.


THANK FOR THE EDUCATION
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 06:16 PM
  #26  
wannadiesel's Avatar
Adminstrator-ess
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 19
From: New Holland, PA
Originally Posted by goodtyms
Will using a different thickness headgasket require different thickness injector washers? I understand that injector height affects the spray patern, or is .010" trivial for injector spacing?
It would be best to drop the injectors back down where they were to try to keep the spray in the bowl. We mess that up all the time by playing with the timing and it doesn't seem to hurt much, so it's not critical.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 08:55 PM
  #27  
goodtyms's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Area
Back on the road!

Alrighty then! It's been together and back on the road for a few weeks!

It took way too long to get it back together...normally I can loosely organize my engine hardware (Plastic stacked drawers marked "block hardware", "Intake", "V/C", etc.) and can remember where almost everything goes...with minmal process-of-elimination educated guesses. It wasn't quite as easy this time, but I got there. In addintion to making my Ram fly, I also happen to be part of trying to make the biggest plastic airplane ever fly, and between the three of us, I'm the one the seems to be doing most of the flying!

Anyway, first and foremost, it doesn't leak...anymore, anywhere! I did pinch two valve cover gaskets during reasembly, promptly lubing up my clean engine, but they're fixed now.

A summary for those that don't want to start at the beginning of the thread:

I started this adventure to fix and external coolant leak at the head gasket under the #1 injector. But, as many things go, "while I'm in there"...

I ported and lightly polished the factory exhaust manifold, a 12 CM W/G housing and the head. I also had the head milled .010" and the valves ground. I reinstalled the head with an .020" head gasket, ARP 12mm head studs, and added a piston lift pump. I blended the aluminum intake elbow and replaced the whimpy stock I/C boots with silicone ones. It was a struggle, but I didn't touch them pump yet, wanting at leat 1 or 2 H/G retorques first - I've done one.

The EGTs seem to have dropped, maybe 50 to 100F. The maximum boost is down from 32 to 28lbs, but I expected that based on improved air flow. I haven't had stable enough driving conditions to get a reliable MPG number, but don't expect much change, if any.

The next step, even before pump mods, is to get the Transgo kit and deep pan installed on the trans, and maybe a Hughes torque convertor. Doing this stuff in order can quite an excercise in patience, but I'm familiar with what happens when you start a series of mods that dramatically increase torque, before beefing the downstream components - it ends up costing double!

Oh yeah, I almost forgot...I killed the KDP too! Tried the Cummins tab, but the coat hanger method looked and worked better.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 09:46 PM
  #28  
flashgordon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 1
From: WY
So....how dus the seat of the pants fill, is the power curve the same or high/lower?

Dus it sound diff ?

Edit Glad to sea that long project dun and running!
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 10:09 PM
  #29  
mopar2ya's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 754
Likes: 76
From: Salina, KS
As expected on the boost drop, thats good. I cant wait to get the head we ported w/ radius cut and backcut valves to Mike down there in Texas and have him run 80-100 psi in it. We do alot of heads and these Cummins heads are pretty sorry in stock form.

Congrats on the results.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 11:42 PM
  #30  
goodtyms's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Area
I did notice a seat of the pants improvement, as well as a bit more turbo whistle - a good thing! I realize that I won't really benefit from all the porting work until I add fuel, but the hard part is done.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 AM.