Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for second generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories.

Smarty Test - Economy Setting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 07:36 AM
  #1  
RowJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,234
Likes: 1
From: Texas/Oklahoma Border
Smarty Test - Economy Setting

Set Smarty on SW #1 for a Sunday trip to Waco,Tx and back. 455 miles R.T.; Interstate all the way.

Results - Gained 1.1 mpg over normal Hwy mileage!

Notes:
-About 40 miles, say 10% were around town... before leaving (Sat night) and around Waco.
-TST Box - Off
-Economy Setting is peppy.. more so than I expected. I was empty in back and had plenty of power for passing, on ramps, etc. Suspect this setting would work well for light to med. towing.
-Actually drove this trip a little harder than I normally do, due to time constraints. Average hwy speed was 73-75 mph. Point is, I did not baby it for a mileage test! Others could probably do better than +1.1 mpg.
-Used cruise control 75% of the time.
-Filled up, when I got back, at same tank and in same way.

Nice combo of power & mileage...well done Marco!

RJ
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 08:02 AM
  #2  
HOHN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 6
From: Cummins Technical Center, IN
I agree. I've been pestering Marco to make the "fuel saver" function a TRUE mpg-is-what-matters-most feature.

Say you're cruising the Interstate and have plenty of power even with just 60% of it available.

What if the "fuel saver" also combined the reduced responsiveness of the "half power" function??


There's more to mpg than just steady-state efficiency. Transitions matter a lot, and restricting the "ramp rate" in the fueling curve would have to help a lot in real world MPG.

Most of us understand that fuel saver would cost some hp, don't we? We understand it's not designed for heavy towing, right???

Or am I just FOC as usual?
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 08:49 AM
  #3  
duallydave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
From: vernon b.c. canada
Talking

i agree when i put it on #1 for economy i would sacrifice some responsivness to get better milage,i also agree mating #1 with #0 would be a good idea.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 01:02 PM
  #4  
Diesel-Dan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,534
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
UM.....RJ.....lets not forget that the AC was not on......the sweat on my back can prove that! haha........... (AND im a Buck Fifty!)

Lets try a run with the AC on next time....just for S and G's! haha......
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
armourbl
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (6.7L Only)
17
Jan 29, 2012 07:25 PM
EPCO
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
1
May 24, 2010 03:27 PM
samahi72
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
4
Jun 1, 2007 08:07 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 PM.