HX35W Compressor size
Trending Topics
Well I just thought about it, I have a destroyed HX35 in my garage lol. I'll go see if I can figure it out...
OK on the HX35 I just measured I couldn't find the wheel (I think it was in several pieces) but the center section's groove was 2.832" that accepts the wheel. So the exducer I geuss would be around 71mm right?
OK on the HX35 I just measured I couldn't find the wheel (I think it was in several pieces) but the center section's groove was 2.832" that accepts the wheel. So the exducer I geuss would be around 71mm right?
Hohn, I wonder how a GT4082 would compare to a stocker in flow and spoolup with a .68 a/r turbine housing?
If a minute or two I will go measure the same groove on an HX40 I have here as well... For comparison sake...
The same groove on the HX40 I have is 3.020" if that helps anyone...
If a minute or two I will go measure the same groove on an HX40 I have here as well... For comparison sake...
The same groove on the HX40 I have is 3.020" if that helps anyone...
Hohn, I wonder how a GT4082 would compare to a stocker in flow and spoolup with a .68 a/r turbine housing?
If a minute or two I will go measure the same groove on an HX40 I have here as well... For comparison sake...
The same groove on the HX40 I have is 3.020" if that helps anyone...
If a minute or two I will go measure the same groove on an HX40 I have here as well... For comparison sake...
The same groove on the HX40 I have is 3.020" if that helps anyone...
I'm not impressed by the 4082's map at all. It's capable of higher PRs, but it's SO NARROW that's it's essentially useless imo. At a PR of 3:1, it's only 20lb/min wide! This is a very special application turbo, and I doubt that CTD is that application where this would work.
Spoolup would be OK, but drivepressure with the tight housing would be high.
I think all around the 4082 with a .68 housing would be a miserable turbo setup. Far better to drop down to the 3782 imo, or even a 3582. The 3582 will spool yesterday, buyt you'd need an adapter for the open T3 (undivided) "foot." The 3582 is a smallish turbo too, but should spool really fast-- basically the .82 housing spools 17% faster than the GT37 stg 1. You're talking about essentially a "zero lag" setup with the 3582. It's unfortunately a little too small to be worthwhile unless you are building twins in the 400hp range and want to use it as the secondary.
I've looked up a lot about the Garretts, and I think that it's best to stick with the "packaged" ones for our trucks: the stg1, 2, or 3--unless you are planning on building larger twins for sledpulling or racing, and will use a T4 manifold.
JMO
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WhoCares79
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
5
Jun 3, 2008 11:45 AM
Camarogenius
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
2
Jun 25, 2007 08:55 PM



