Other Everything else not covered in the main topics goes here. Please avoid brand and flame wars. Don't try and up your post count. It won't work in here.

New CPR Rules

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2011, 06:47 AM
  #1  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
Jim Lane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 4,083
Received 232 Likes on 161 Posts
New CPR Rules

Now CPR has become even simpler to perform.

No mouth-to-mouth required in new CPR rules

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23884566/

This should make it less intimidating.

Jim
Old 01-22-2011, 07:27 AM
  #2  
Administrator / Free Time Specialist
 
Totallyrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 7,707
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
rapid, deep presses on the victim’s chest until help arrives
100 a minute
WOW, it might encourage some folks to jump in but boy they better be in shape. That's a difficult pace to maintain.
Old 01-22-2011, 08:23 AM
  #3  
Administrator
 
chaikwa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Jim Lane
Now CPR has become even simpler to perform.

No mouth-to-mouth required in new CPR rules

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23884566/

This should make it less intimidating.

Jim
The 'new rules' are somewhat misleading. The only ones that are not required to give mouth to mouth breathing are those people who have not received training. Of course, no one but health care providers are 'required' to do anything. Even if you have a CPR card in your pocket, you are under NO obligation to provide any care what-so-ever.
Old 01-22-2011, 08:24 AM
  #4  
Administrator ........ DTR's puttin fires out and workin on big trucks admin
 
Hvytrkmech's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,013
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
They have been doing studies on this for years, unfortunately it has not been up channeled for professional rescuer protocol as of yet.
Old 01-22-2011, 08:48 AM
  #5  
Administrator
 
chaikwa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Hvytrkmech
They have been doing studies on this for years, unfortunately it has not been up channeled for professional rescuer protocol as of yet.
What it boiled down to was that "SOME CPR is better than NO CPR", hence the lack of rescue breathing for the untrained lay rescuer.
Old 01-22-2011, 09:37 AM
  #6  
Administrator ........ DTR's puttin fires out and workin on big trucks admin
 
Hvytrkmech's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,013
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The studies that we have seen have shown that the simple action of doing chest compressions actually perfused more oxygenated air then expelling reduced oxygenated air into a patients lungs. essentially the only thing that was better was using a BVM set at 100% or the ideal method, intubation. There were some very interesting studies presented to us over the years on possible changes and updates to procedures, but like everything else things got tied up in red tape.
Old 01-22-2011, 09:39 AM
  #7  
Administrator/Jarhead
 
madhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 14,965
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
The last class I took, it was 30 to two. They said that studies have shown that there is enough O2 in the blood stream for 5 minutes.

The old way did not get enough blood pressure up to transfer the blood.

I've performed CPR a few times, after 5 minutes I was getting a little winded. When there is two people, it's a lot easier.
Old 01-22-2011, 10:04 AM
  #8  
Administrator
 
chaikwa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by madhat
The last class I took, it was 30 to two. They said that studies have shown that there is enough O2 in the blood stream for 5 minutes.

The old way did not get enough blood pressure up to transfer the blood.

I've performed CPR a few times, after 5 minutes I was getting a little winded. When there is two people, it's a lot easier.
You must have had a good instructor because he was right on about the O2 and the blood pressure.
Old 01-22-2011, 10:34 AM
  #9  
Administrator/Jarhead
 
madhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 14,965
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Yeah. We get a 4 hour course every two years. Our last instructor was... drumroll... the fire chief for the base FD...

I want to take an instructor class, there is one coming up in a month or so, I think.
Old 01-22-2011, 10:40 AM
  #10  
I was banned per my own request for speaking the name Pelosi
 
Redleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bristol Michigan
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed, they believe there was more harm done than good during the compression to breath transition. Faster compressions are better than the old two-count method as well.
Old 01-22-2011, 01:35 PM
  #11  
Administrator
 
chaikwa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Hvytrkmech
The studies that we have seen have shown that the simple action of doing chest compressions actually perfused more oxygenated air then expelling reduced oxygenated air into a patients lungs. essentially the only thing that was better was using a BVM set at 100% or the ideal method, intubation.
Correct. But don't forget, for the most part we are dealing with the lay rescuer when we talk about the new changes. Lay rescuers don't normally have access to BVM's and tubes. And there aren't many changes for the health care provider level. We still have to check for a pulse and provide breaths. But now, instead of 'A,B,C', (Airway, Breathing & Circulation), it has changed to 'C,A,B', Circulation, Airway & Breathing.

Originally Posted by madhat
I want to take an instructor class, there is one coming up in a month or so, I think.
There's decent money to be made in it too if it's done right and you offer what the people want, when and where they want it.

Originally Posted by Redleg
Agreed, they believe there was more harm done than good during the compression to breath transition.
There is that, and there was also the consideration that the majority of people, even those trained in CPR, would not do anything due to the mouth to mouth aspect of the procedure. Hence, some is better than none.
Old 01-23-2011, 02:58 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
SIXSLUG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pacific NW, B'ham, Kalispell MT
Posts: 5,553
Received 148 Likes on 127 Posts
Most don't establish the airway and manage to keep it open. Even as trained professionals, we always managed to get air into the stomach, which can cause the victim to vomit more forcefully when they regain consciousness.

Thanks for the masks with the one-way valve! Don't ever leave home without it if you want to help.
Old 01-23-2011, 04:01 PM
  #13  
Administrator/Jarhead
 
madhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 14,965
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
I have a couple of one way sheets in my truck...
Old 01-23-2011, 04:45 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
annabelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NM
Posts: 2,613
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by madhat
The last class I took, it was 30 to two. They said that studies have shown that there is enough O2 in the blood stream for 5 minutes.

The old way did not get enough blood pressure up to transfer the blood.

I've performed CPR a few times, after 5 minutes I was getting a little winded. When there is two people, it's a lot easier.
X2 9 of 2010 by United Blood Bank.
Old 01-24-2011, 12:50 AM
  #15  
DTR Mom
 
Justwannabeme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: hills of cali forn ya
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

use to be on the national Board; Clara Barton Chapter # 1 was founded in Dansville, New York. can't quote the report but can tell ya that the majority of folks willing to help were in the 30-50 year old range.

societal issues were the biggest reason folks: stopped training, refused to get involved, felt it was not worth the chance, bristled at the professionals being paid to respond but not around, so why should the 'tax payer' get involved.
c'mon, you know this: biggest societal reason for not touching another human? AIDS, gay, drugs, fear of being sued.

I am happy the changes are made. just stick with them for more than a year.
35 years of Red Cross classes taught, quit after the tenth change in method.

just make sure the scene is safe- amazing how many times- it isn't.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Spooler
Other
5
10-13-2011 07:29 PM
chaikwa
Other
25
02-16-2011 08:15 AM
Redleg
Other
17
09-15-2009 10:17 PM
AJMartin0321
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
10
11-23-2007 09:27 PM



Quick Reply: New CPR Rules



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 AM.