Other Everything else not covered in the main topics goes here. Please avoid brand and flame wars. Don't try and up your post count. It won't work in here.

i have alot of torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 11:36 AM
  #1  
getblown5.9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
i have alot of torque

i made a comment on my local forum about a 826hp EVO 8 that only put down 597tq...saying that compared to the HP its not alot of tq...next thing i know this guy is telling me that the EVO puts down 3800lb-ft of tq in a certain gear at a certain rpm, and thats way more than my truck puts down.

so now he says that if my truck were to dyno 800tq, then im really putting down 800x3.54 (gear ratio)=2,832tq to the ground...

who'da thunk it?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 11:47 AM
  #2  
derek840378's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
From: Crosby, TEXAS
lets see... 250x2.73=682.5 and the 250 is a factory # so im prolly lookin at about 200 lb/ft
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 12:02 PM
  #3  
signature600's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 0
From: Jeffersonville, Ohio
Yeah, but you're also forgetting that 0.73 6th gear, so that actually takes some of the torque away, right

These ricers scare me sometimes!
Chris

On edit!!! I also forgot tire size...you need to add that in too!!
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 12:11 PM
  #4  
RustyJC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 4
From: Cypress, TX
Multiply your flywheel torque by 1st gear ratio times rear axle ratio. That'll blow him away!!

Rusty
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 12:13 PM
  #5  
TAS05CTD610's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: West Warwick, RI
Isn't that backwards. I mean your turning 3.73 to 1. So it would actualy decrease your torque.

I mean if you had 500lbs of torque and you had a 1. to 3.73 ratio, then yes you would amplify the torque rating. However not the other way around.

No way a ricer has that much torque, i don't even think it weighs that much.

It's amazing the caculations people come up with. Next thing you know my truck has 30lbs of thrust comming out of the jet engine turbo
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 12:25 PM
  #6  
RustyJC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 4
From: Cypress, TX
Let's assume my truck is stock with 505 lb-ft of torque.

1st gear ratio in the NV5600 is 5.63:1

Rear axle ratio is 4.10:1

Therefore, maximum theoretical torque delivered to the rear wheels is:

505 x 5.63 x 4.10 = 11656 lb-ft

Compare that to the ricer's 3800 lb-ft!

The transmission and rear axle multiply torque but cannot multiply horsepower.

Rusty
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 12:45 PM
  #7  
getblown5.9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
that 3800 number of the evo came from a 4th or 5th gear direct drive dyno pull...so no tranny gearing to mutiply, just 597x(rear end ratio)

i just found this funny that he wanted to trick me by getting super technical on me
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 01:25 PM
  #8  
RustyJC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 4
From: Cypress, TX
3800 lb-ft / 597 lb-ft = 6.37:1 final drive ratio? Sounds pretty low to me for a car with short tires, a 7000 RPM redline and an advertised 155 MPH top speed!

At any rate, he's just playing a gearing game. That being the case, I'll submit my puny 762 lb-ft (dyno) x 5.63 first gear x 4.10 rear axle = 17589 lb-ft for him to beat.

Rusty
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 01:27 PM
  #9  
TAS05CTD610's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: West Warwick, RI
Couldn't you just ask him to hook up via a heavy duty chain, and see which one really does have more power??? I mean a nice little love bump should pretty much destroy the huge race wing, plastic ground efects, and pretty much crumple the frame.....
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 02:11 PM
  #10  
getblown5.9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
i offered to get the chains and hook them up...i figure the evo is AWD, has more HP and technically more tq than me (depending on gear) so it should pull me, ill even be in 2wd
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 02:45 PM
  #11  
banshee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
I'll hook up to the Evo!!

1189 lb-ft @ flywheel X 3.73:1 Axle ratio X 5.63:1 1st gear X 2.72:1 low range 4X4

= 67,915 lb-ft of torque @ the rear hub
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 03:56 PM
  #12  
durasmack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: Maineville, Ohio
I will hook a couple of em at the same time.......
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 04:27 PM
  #13  
mainer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: fryeburg maine
grandpa always said there is no replacement for displacement. The 'ol evo and its 2.2L 4 banger aint got nothing on the 5.9. Hooking chains you also gotta look at hitch hight and total vechial weight. Maybe even tire surface aera on the ground, if he has wicked wide tires there is more friction there making it harder for you to pull him? The last one is just a shot in the dark, does it make sence?


COop
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 04:34 PM
  #14  
BigBlue's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Shoot, I'll drop my hitch down to their level and put skinny's on my truck if that's what it takes.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 05:05 PM
  #15  
signature600's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 0
From: Jeffersonville, Ohio
Spinners...the momentum of the spinnin' dubs will keep you going...even if you're stopped

Chris
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 AM.