Would you be jealous (scared) if GM, Ford or any other company announced CAT engines?
I understand the difference between the working diesel and the play diesel. My other post was driven mostly by the obserdity of the brand loyalist. I can see you;re not but Lots of people are. every brand has its own set of problems.
And Ford superduty class 6 and 7 trucks have offered Cats as an engine option for years, so dropping it down to the class 5 isn't that far feched.
And Ford superduty class 6 and 7 trucks have offered Cats as an engine option for years, so dropping it down to the class 5 isn't that far feched.
I will never take the advice of a mech. when it comes to operation cost and performance costs. They just don't know that stuff. They will only see problems and base opinions on that. That is a narrow view...too narrow for my taste. Now, if they run trucks as well, that is different. Actually running trucks and seeing the bottom line year after year is a lot different than seeing what the wrecker brings in.
The ACERT, while being touted as the best thing since sliced bread, has proven to be yet another problematic pile of junk. To the point where a certain manufacturer of highway trucks actually charges a premium on top of the regular selling price for putting the CAT in your truck. This is to help offset the cost of warranty repairs.
They run good but they constantly leak oil.
I've owned them all, (including Detroit sadly
) and currently own 1-N14, 1-3406E, 3-C15's, 1-C15(Bridge), and 1-C15 ACCERT. If the Cat was as expensive to maintain and operate and unreliable as some like to say, don't you think I would bought the Cummins? If the ACCERT turns out to be as bad as some like to say I'll look elsewhere, but it's been relatively problem free for the first 130,000 miles. Sure some people are brand loyal, on these "Cummins" forums there are people who would buy a Ford Pinto if you put a Cummins sticker on it. But when it comes to making money if I have a truck that can bring in around $5k a week each, I don't care what brand of engine it is as long as it does what it's designed to do. The best engines to me are the ones you never have to look at unless you’re doing routine maintaince. Would I buy a pickup with a Cat. Sure, I've never been disappointed with any of their products so far. I didn't buy my Dodge because it's a dodge, I bought it because I wanted a toy and they're easy to mod. A Cat C7 with CR fuel system in a King Ranch Ford F-450 with an Allison would be the "Golden ticket"; I probably couldn't get rid of this Dodge fast enough.
I agree. I never buy a truck that has been completely redesigned until it has been on the market for a few years and some bugs have been worked out. A Cat would be cool, especially to open the hood and see yellow! But, I'm sure the auto industry would make them paint them black and foo foo them up a little.
I have been in essentiallythe same machine. One had a 8.3? Cummins and the other was a CAT motor. The CAT motor had a bunch more power and lots of low end tq that never bogged down.
The machine was a new Bombi Snow Cat BR350. The CAT motor was awesome and could push a ton more snow up a hill w.o out slowing down.
Everything else was the same, same machine and same impments.
I know our truck are different then a snow cat but its just to inform you the CAT was better in that instance.
The machine was a new Bombi Snow Cat BR350. The CAT motor was awesome and could push a ton more snow up a hill w.o out slowing down.
Everything else was the same, same machine and same impments.
I know our truck are different then a snow cat but its just to inform you the CAT was better in that instance.
Ive driven similar sized loaders with cummins and cat motors.The 8.3 cummins could push through anything ,the cat was alright,but the cummins never seemed to run out of steam.As far as a truck with a cat motor,depending on the price it would be a good idea.I mean cat engines are reliable,theres no doubt about it.But I wouldnt buy anything new these days,not with the emmisions crap on there.I'll stick with a 12v anyday,something breaks-I fix it easily by myself.I'd much rather see a small series 60 in a truck than a cat
I guess, following that logic, one would not take heed when a ford dealership tech warns you away from the 6.0. After all, they only see the problems.
I gotta admit, it would seem to me that a mechanic that works on them every day could tell you which engines can be expected to run when you need to drive them. That being the case, I'd also think that an engine that won't run is somewhat detrimental to operation and performance costs? I dunno, I guess you also have to factor in the fuel the non-running engines don't use, so that would help offset not getting any work done.
No matter how I look at it, I can't get past thinking that running vs nonrunning vehicles plays a part in operation and performance costs. Surely a mechanic would know something about that?
I'd also venture to guess that there is WAY more money to be made making heavy equipment, industrial engines, gensets, and gas turbines than could ever be made by mass producing light duty truck engines. (and yes your pickup is light duty reguardless of what the tailgate says)
Yes, but ford techs with much time under their belt have seen the 7.3. It is not the 7.3 they're advising people to stay away from, only the 6.0.
As far as the cummins not being bulletproof, that's true. It's also totally irrelevant to what I was saying. My purpose was not another cummins/powerstroke comparison, it was to illustrate a case in which technicians, who know how badly and how often these things fail, say to avoid a certain one and not the other.
Ignore that at your own peril.
As far as the cummins not being bulletproof, that's true. It's also totally irrelevant to what I was saying. My purpose was not another cummins/powerstroke comparison, it was to illustrate a case in which technicians, who know how badly and how often these things fail, say to avoid a certain one and not the other.
Ignore that at your own peril.



