General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

I'm done with Diesel Power Mag

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2006 | 11:23 PM
  #31  
Red3quarter's Avatar
DTR's Locomotive Superhero and the DTR Sweet Tea Specialist
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 0
From: Valparaiso, IN
There is a reason why Diesel Power resides next to my toilet now. All it's used for is something to glance though for a few minutes.
matt
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2006 | 11:28 PM
  #32  
mulepackin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
No Perkins industrials either?!
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2006 | 04:23 AM
  #33  
streetsmoker's Avatar
Chapter President
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 0
From: Tupelo, MS
The biggest failure in that article, and ask any Detroit mechanic if you want. The series 71 Detriot was barely mention as a side note when naming the 60. Heck, without the 71, the 60, nor any other diesel we have today would be arround or even thought of as a way to transport goods. Until the 71 came out, most all heavy trucks used large gasoline engines, with only a few diesels scatttered here and there. It was the 1st widely used and accepted diesel engine in use by all forms of industrial, agricultural, and commercial haulers, and made diesel a viable, cheaper, and better design than gas in heavy applications.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2006 | 03:14 PM
  #34  
Beamwalker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Western n.c
i havent driven a series 60 but ive drove the others and you know why they are green? so they can hide amongst the weeds when everyone else goes by. them old oil leakers are junk in my opinion. but thats my view.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2006 | 10:06 PM
  #35  
inline6359's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Well as far as the new series 60 not many people i know even like those motors. but that is not the problem. I have had several problems with the mag. I actually wrotye them a letter about the 1000hp cummins. they said it made 1000hp on #2 only but in the article they said it was N2O injected. Wat gives. I started reading diesel world mag and i havent looked back. .02
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 12:40 AM
  #36  
pizzaboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Reno
i definately did scratch my head wondering why the cummins was NUMBERED as <10>

the above statements about bias in mags is 100% true. its completely run off of sponsors and THEN the people who read them.

on a side note, i would like the #8 diesel engine- wartsila-sulzer (25k liter displacement)(5.6mil ft/lb torque!!!!) all at only 102RPM..... AWESOME!!!!
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 06:55 PM
  #37  
ENGINENUT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: middle Tennessee
Originally Posted by streetsmoker
The biggest failure in that article, and ask any Detroit mechanic if you want. The series 71 Detriot was barely mention as a side note when naming the 60. Heck, without the 71, the 60, nor any other diesel we have today would be arround or even thought of as a way to transport goods. Until the 71 came out, most all heavy trucks used large gasoline engines, with only a few diesels scatttered here and there. It was the 1st widely used and accepted diesel engine in use by all forms of industrial, agricultural, and commercial haulers, and made diesel a viable, cheaper, and better design than gas in heavy applications.
Streetsmoker you got that right about the Jimmy (AKA Detroit) as a historically important design.It came along at a time when user friendly diesels were rare(in the US) and with the great manufacturing ability of the General and the need for engines in the war effort which exposed them to a large number of semi-skilled engine operators, they became well known and respected by the boys that came back to need diesel power in the trucks and equipment they used to build a post war America.The diesels of pre war era were heavy,labor intensive to keep in proper order, and fostered a special mechanical skill called "diesel mechanic".The Cummins and Cat of the day was too big and unresponsive to change in speed for road use and the light "high speed" Dodge, Hercules,Buda,and Waukesha Hesselmann were harder to start and manage by the driver and mechanic found in the average town.Mack developed an enviable reputation and the Cummins came along quick enough but the Jimmy was anybodys engine that would start and run when worn beyond a reasonable point.(got to go now more later)
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 06:56 PM
  #38  
Brock's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Charleston SC
Originally Posted by Jfaulkner
Aparently you guys missed the part of the article that said "In no specific order"


I did to at first until I read it again.....but thinking them putting the Cummins on opening shot was their way of saying it was THE BEST without showing partiality to the others...
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 08:30 PM
  #39  
extremeshot's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Southern, California
Just to let you know that the article does say "IN NO SPECIFIC ORDER. " I have the mag. read the article.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 08:40 PM
  #40  
Begle1's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by extremeshot
Just to let you know that the article does say "IN NO SPECIFIC ORDER. " I have the mag. read the article.
So, I have to ask, does it say "NO SPECIFIC ORDER" in all caps like that?

I think that some people owe the magazine an apology...
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 09:00 PM
  #41  
Cummins Freak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: Williston, ND
Originally Posted by BigBlue
I quit having respect for them when they said that you need a chip before you need gauges.

thats is the last mag i bought i read the same thing and thought WOW now we'll have a bunch of idiots blowing/melting motors left and right
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 10:08 PM
  #42  
Buckshotmckee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
From: God's Country (Castle Rock, Co)
Originally Posted by Begle1
I think that some people owe the magazine an apology...
I think NOT Begle!
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 10:12 PM
  #43  
Begle1's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Buckshotmckee
I think NOT Begle!
Well, not youuu... You still have the right to complain about the inclusion of the VW Diesel on the list.

I was talking about, you know, the otheerr people...
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2006 | 09:28 AM
  #44  
cincydiesel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Muted one day, Banned the next....... Ah the life of a DTR 1%'er
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,187
Likes: 0
From: Ohio: Home of the disappointing sports teams
Originally Posted by Begle1
So, I have to ask, does it say "NO SPECIFIC ORDER" in all caps like that?

I think that some people owe the magazine an apology...
I agree that is was stated that "No specific order" but the D-Max does not deserve to be in the top ten many others come way before the 7.3 AND d-MAX AS well as the Cummins
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2006 | 03:53 PM
  #45  
squirlchasr919's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: virginia beach, va
Alright so I think this is a fairly hot issue here, not to add more coal to the fire, but..........
What do you guys think will be the field for the big challenge they have comming? I guess the contestants will be unvailed in the next issue. I'd imagine that you wouldn't even be considered for the challenge without your name on a receipt from banks.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM.