General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

according to my Mechanic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 06:00 PM
  #31  
Hannibal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
From: west central Florida
I've owned a couple of Chevy vans way back. Then a Dodge 1-ton B300 Maxivan. Then an '84 Isuzu P'up diesel that I put 188k miles on when the speedo cable broke. Drove it two more years. Probably 250k~ miles. It was a good truck for a little fellow. Then my '94 Fraud. It was ok but the windshield wiper motor and mechanism was noisy as all haities. It took away from the tinniness of the rest of the truck. Less than a year later with a mere 28k I traded it for a '95 Dodge Cummins. The rest is in the sig. I like the Dodge part so much I'll take one with or without the Cummins. For the money, the Dodge can't be beat either way. Other than the a/c evaporators, I haven't had a trip stopping problem with any of our Dodges. Nothing about them is weak.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 05:10 AM
  #32  
killfast1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery AL
Granted this may be from the OLD school thinking, but from what I have seen it is mostly true.

This is a quote form my favorite uncle ( who died recently)

" you want a truck that looks OK and rides nice, get a chevy. You want a truck that looks nice and rides worse get a ford. You want a truck that just plain works and wont quit get a dodge."


As far as the old chevy gasser crowd goes. I was in that crowd. because of 1 reason $$$$$$.

Dodges charges/charger rt and duster and what not with the 440 was bad as could be but was real expensive to trick out

Fords were not as fast and didnt cost as much to tick out. and parts were easier to get also.

Chevies were a dime a dozen and cheap as could be. more bang for the buck.

my 2 cents
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 04:44 PM
  #33  
Haulin_in_Dixie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,199
Likes: 1
From: Branchville, Alabama
Originally posted by killfast1
Granted this may be from the OLD school thinking, but from what I have seen it is mostly true.

This is a quote form my favorite uncle ( who died recently)

" you want a truck that looks OK and rides nice, get a chevy. You want a truck that looks nice and rides worse get a ford. You want a truck that just plain works and wont quit get a dodge."


As far as the old chevy gasser crowd goes. I was in that crowd. because of 1 reason $$$$$$.

Dodges charges/charger rt and duster and what not with the 440 was bad as could be but was real expensive to trick out

Fords were not as fast and didnt cost as much to tick out. and parts were easier to get also.

Chevies were a dime a dozen and cheap as could be. more bang for the buck.

my 2 cents
You just never played with a Cleveland. Chevvy could not compete with it and had the power to kill factory racing. The Chevvy was early 1950's design and the Cleveland was 1960's. Chevvy had to choose between coming up with a new engine design or getting out of racing.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 06:30 PM
  #34  
jon96ctd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: california
if you want a car with a bed and a hitch get the chevy "hd". if you want a TRUCK get the dodge! The allison 1000 works awesome...as a boat anchor, seriously, if you're going to tow with it you will have problems with it. If you want to tow with a reliable truck that gets good mileage you won't be disappointed by the dodge unless you end up with a lemon. I'm a die-hard chevy v-8 fan and there's no way I'd take the durajunk over the cummins. My grandpa has an '03 D-max, yeah it's got a little smoother ride than the dodge but it's uncomfortable to me because it has a horrible road feel, no steering feedback makes it a supersensitive PITA to drive around curves. Since MercBenz bought DC the truck interiors have gotten A LOT nicer IMO.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 07:03 PM
  #35  
PeteRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Ridgecrest, CA
We've got almost 3000 miles on our company Duramax now. The Allison chokes the motor. It won't downshift unless you floor it. Sometimes it still won't downshift. The motor sings at 3000 rpm, but getting the trans to allow that rpm is tough. My supervisor is looking for a way to kill this motor so we can get a new Cummins. He hates this Chevy.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #36  
mikmaze's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,502
Likes: 0
From: Cedar Grove, New Jersey
gas n go should kill it....
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 08:47 PM
  #37  
phox_mulder's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,522
Likes: 4
From: Sandy, Utah
Ooops, did I put unleaded in there?




phox
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 08:56 PM
  #38  
PeteRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Ridgecrest, CA
Originally posted by phox_mulder
Ooops, did I put unleaded in there?




phox
You guys are bad. I don't have enough seniority in this company to be sabotaging $38k trucks. Looking the other way while he does it is another story altogether.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 11:54 PM
  #39  
Clunk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 1
From: Tenn.
"You just never played with a Cleveland. Chevvy could not compete with it and had the power to kill factory racing. The Chevvy was early 1950's design and the Cleveland was 1960's. Chevvy had to choose between coming up with a new engine design or getting out of racing."

Thatsa fact, the Cleveland head outflows a BBC by NHRA Superstock rules. Lighter & easier to work on too. I don't understand why no one really persues it since Wayne Hutton ran his in GT/C years ago.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2005 | 05:12 AM
  #40  
killfast1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery AL
Originally posted by Haulin_in_Dixie
You just never played with a Cleveland. Chevvy could not compete with it and had the power to kill factory racing. The Chevvy was early 1950's design and the Cleveland was 1960's. Chevvy had to choose between coming up with a new engine design or getting out of racing.

Haulin

I did play with them but for the parts cost more than the same parts for a chevy. So I could have more money to build with for a chevy than I could with the ford. Dodge parts were the most expensive.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2005 | 06:32 AM
  #41  
j-fox's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 1
Your mechanic wants you in a chevy because he is familiar with working on it. They are very common. Everyone with a chevy product must work on it to keep it going.

Dodges are less common and have fewer problems.

I grew up with the chevys and even as a kid--12 years old- I could take a motor out!!
By an odd chance I bought a Dodge van, a 77 and 10 years later with 133,000 miles everything still worked. Been buying them every since. Even bought a 87 chevy 1500 new. A year later it had trans touble, starter replaced, altewrnator replaced. Sold it to a friend who was dieing to have it!! Bought back into the Dodges and been very dependable. Up to this VP-44 pump failure. A Bosch product.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cowboy_Customs
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
34
Jun 8, 2007 08:02 AM
xp8103
General Diesel Discussion
23
Nov 5, 2004 06:08 PM
Suburbanite
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
3
Oct 24, 2003 10:02 AM
RottnRam
Other
12
Sep 19, 2003 02:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 AM.