Big Rigs Talk about other Cummins powered vehicles here. As a matter of fact, it doesn't even have to be Cummins, but it will be diesel! :)

Detroit Diesel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2009 | 12:21 PM
  #1  
megacabdad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 0
From: Erie, PA
Arrow Detroit Diesel

You can't have a Big Rig forum without some discussion of everyone's favorite diesel engine! SARCASM


Reply
Old May 17, 2009 | 12:55 PM
  #2  
Jfaulkner's Avatar
Muted User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
I think "everyones" favorite is a bit much. The 2 strokes are by far the best at turning diesel into noise. 200 hp and 5 ft lbs of torque.

Everyone knows Diesel engines are like Bananas, They aren't any good until they turn yellow.
Reply
Old May 17, 2009 | 12:59 PM
  #3  
megacabdad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 0
From: Erie, PA
It's hard to be sarcastic while typing!
Reply
Old May 17, 2009 | 06:25 PM
  #4  
rich's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,308
Likes: 1
From: Kerrville eastern new mexico, west texas
yellow nice but i still prefer a red top
Reply
Old May 18, 2009 | 12:01 AM
  #5  
Russ Roth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 669
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver, WA
Originally Posted by Jfaulkner
The 2 strokes are by far the best at turning diesel into noise. 200 hp and 5 ft lbs of torque.
Now that's a true enough statement.
Reply
Old May 18, 2009 | 07:19 AM
  #6  
Hvytrkmech's Avatar
Administrator ........ DTR's puttin fires out and workin on big trucks admin
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,013
Likes: 3
You guys are way wrong. The silver 92's made 475-500 hp and 10#'s tq.



Yellow was the way to go until the accerts, then it was a crap shoot.



Tim
Reply
Old May 18, 2009 | 08:41 AM
  #7  
Russ Roth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 669
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver, WA
Originally Posted by Hvytrkmech
You guys are way wrong. The silver 92's made 475-500 hp and 10#'s tq. Tim

LOL. Now that's just plain funny. I never drove an 8 but our engine company was a 6V92 T/A. Wasn't all that great although it would eat up the 8V71 I drove in the truck.
Reply
Old May 18, 2009 | 04:36 PM
  #8  
MDLP412's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Galway, NY
anyone care to explain to me why these motors didnt make power? big turbos and blowers with twice as many power strokes as a 4 stroke.... please explain
Reply
Old May 18, 2009 | 05:32 PM
  #9  
wannadiesel's Avatar
Adminstrator-ess
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 19
From: New Holland, PA
Originally Posted by Jfaulkner
The 2 strokes are by far the best at turning diesel into noise.
But what sweet noise it is!
Reply
Old May 18, 2009 | 07:51 PM
  #10  
dieselcamp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
Originally Posted by MDLP412
anyone care to explain to me why these motors didnt make power? big turbos and blowers with twice as many power strokes as a 4 stroke.... please explain
Because of the need to scavenge the cylinder. You see the piston was coming up but the port is open quite a ways up the cylinder before it started to compress the air. They needed the blower to clear the cylinder they were not supercharged until they used a turbo. Also not much low end torque as compared to a 4 stroke, hard on fuel too.
Reply
Old May 22, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #11  
RollinCoalSmoke's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: H'ville Tx.
I ran an old 12v71 in a truck that was set up way way hot. Flat land running it would do the roll but if it saw a hill it turned coward of the county. You could get passed by a wore out VW microbus on a very slight grade. But with twin straights and a 13sp you had a ride that sounded like it would pull heaven to the cross and had a sound that would wake the dead. Between this truck and a few 671s and 8v71s with straights is probably why I have to have the volume on the TV LOUD. LOL the best thing about the good ole days is they are gone.
Reply
Old May 24, 2009 | 01:05 PM
  #12  
chaikwa's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 2
From: Kalamazoo, Michigan
Originally Posted by Jfaulkner
200 hp and 5 ft lbs of torque.
I think you're being a bit generous on the horsepower.

Originally Posted by Hvytrkmech
You guys are way wrong. The silver 92's made 475-500 hp and 10#'s tq.
And you're being a LOT generous on horsepower. The key to horse power designations in the Detroits is their series numbers; 6V92= 6 HP, 92 leaks. 8V92= 8 HP & 92 leaks, and so on and so on.

Originally Posted by wannadiesel
But what sweet noise it is!
Especially when it stops! For the life of me I cannot understand why anyone who was familiar with these engines would willingly buy one, knowing that they were going to have to listen to it scream 8 to 10 hours a day, not to mention that your hands felt like you had held onto a hammer-drill all day when you were done driving.

Boat anchors.

chaikwa.
Reply
Old May 24, 2009 | 01:35 PM
  #13  
Russ Roth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 669
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver, WA
Originally Posted by chaikwa
I think you're being a bit generous on the horsepower.

And you're being a LOT generous on horsepower. The key to horse power designations in the Detroits is their series numbers; 6V92= 6 HP, 92 leaks. 8V92= 8 HP & 92 leaks, and so on and so on.

Especially when it stops! For the life of me I cannot understand why anyone who was familiar with these engines would willingly buy one, knowing that they were going to have to listen to it scream 8 to 10 hours a day, not to mention that your hands felt like you had held onto a hammer-drill all day when you were done driving.

Boat anchors.

chaikwa.
LOL. Having not driven one at a point early in my life I thought some of those guys had stereo headphones on since they were driving pretty nice rigs. Until I worked for an outfit that ran 8V71's. I was at Sanderson Safety the very next morning for a pair of muffs. Summer time and a tanker with twin short stacks was NOT a good thing with no AC. They sounded and ran like a hot rod on the flats but fell on their face on a hill. Would get passed by triples on Cabbage hill.
Reply
Old May 24, 2009 | 06:04 PM
  #14  
rebal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,899
Likes: 3
From: Yuba city Kalifornia
My first 10 wheeler was a 61 GMC with a 401v6 gas motor ....you want to talk slow then I stepped in to the BIG league with my first 8v71. then I learned there was real big power to be had...hence silver8V92TA. But my BIG CAM 400 would walk all over them
Reply
Old May 24, 2009 | 09:59 PM
  #15  
RollinCoalSmoke's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: H'ville Tx.
V6 GMC with huge cubic inches and nooooooo fuel mileage. But they didn't do a bad job. The younger generation will probably never know what a screamin jimmy 6 or double breasted yamaha 8v71 was really about. A/C on a "few" trucks when it worked, most had 2/60 a/c "2windows open at 60 mph". The good ole days-sure glad they are gone.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 AM.