3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only) Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for third generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories. THIS IS FOR THE 5.9L ONLY!

what exactly is drive pressure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 10:05 AM
  #16  
ratsun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 1
From: Wet Coast, Canada
Originally Posted by Ace
Advanced timing raises cylinder pressure.
Absolutely
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 10:14 AM
  #17  
soulezoo's Avatar
DTR 1st Sergeant
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,530
Likes: 6
From: Applegate, CA
Originally Posted by no_6_oh_no
Darn soulzoo, who stole your user name and posted this rubbish. I know you know better than that!


A turbo's map has little to do with DP, it can be higher or lower when the compressor is in or out of its map. DP is a function of the hot side housing and size not the compressor. A large turbine turbo can be out of its efficieny map and still have relatively small DP in relation to boost.

Oh, one other thing, I really don't think a HG that is capable of containing 1500-2000 psi of cylinder combustion pressure is gonna be bothered by 60, 70, even 80 psi of drive pressure. Considering DP is not ever working directly on any part of the HG it simply amazes me people think it can effect it. Popping an HG is heat or combustion pressure not boost or DP.
Well, we agree/disagree at the same time... while I understand it, I also understand that my ability to convey that into words doesn't always work right. And I was trying to keep it simple. HG popping is a cause/effect thing. Absolutely it is too much cyl pressure that causes this. But then you you have to examine how this happened. There is more than one way to do this for sure. And it is my firm belief that boost/DP ratio can contribute to this. Why can some (stock headbolts and HG) engines survive multiple passes at 55-60 psi boost and the HG is fine while others pop at 45 psi?

I did oversimplify the use of the term MAP... but I am sure you understand this is why II offers the same turbo with three different turbines for example.

Anyway, I'll respectfully hold my position on this one even if I didn't state it correctly...
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 10:14 AM
  #18  
Ace's Avatar
Ace
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,421
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by no_6_oh_no
Just saying DP will cause HG failure is way too broad and misleading.
Unless you actually understand how it works.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 10:16 AM
  #19  
soulezoo's Avatar
DTR 1st Sergeant
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,530
Likes: 6
From: Applegate, CA
Originally Posted by no_6_oh_no
Darn soulzoo, who stole your user name and posted this rubbish. I know you know better than that!


A turbo's map has little to do with DP, it can be higher or lower when the compressor is in or out of its map. DP is a function of the hot side housing and size not the compressor. A large turbine turbo can be out of its efficieny map and still have relatively small DP in relation to boost.

Oh, one other thing, I really don't think a HG that is capable of containing 1500-2000 psi of cylinder combustion pressure is gonna be bothered by 60, 70, even 80 psi of drive pressure. Considering DP is not ever working directly on any part of the HG it simply amazes me people think it can effect it. Popping an HG is heat or combustion pressure not boost or DP.
Well, we agree/disagree at the same time... while I understand it, I also understand that my ability to convey that into words doesn't always work right. And I was trying to keep it simple for the simple question of the OP that didn't need an encyclopaedic response . HG popping is a cause/effect thing. Absolutely it is too much cyl pressure that causes this. But then you you have to examine how this happened. There is more than one way to do this for sure. And it is my firm belief that boost/DP ratio can contribute to this. Why can some (stock headbolts and HG) engines survive multiple passes at 55-60 psi boost and the HG is fine while others pop easily at 45 psi? And these numbers can vary greatly dependent on mods... for instance, with my first hx35/40 over 3b set up I could hit 60 psi boost with about 75 psi DP. That setup is only flowing about high 80's in lbs/min of air. My next setup was flowing 113 lbs/min from the primary at as high as 85psi boost with DP a little over 100psi (studs and stock HG) this would support your position except there are those that have had HG failure at a lot lower boost and DP levels. Now with a cam and porting, my primary flows in the low/mid 130's in lbs/min, my HP is up but I only see 60psi boost and 60psi DP... The point of that is.. a lot more air + a lot more fuel = a lot more power which typically is from more force on the pistons from more cylinder pressure. I have to say I have seen more HG failure from folks trying to get 45-50 psi from their stock turbo than I have from folks seeing 55 psi from a silver bullet. So you have to ask why?

I did oversimplify the use of the term MAP for the purpose of the OP... but I am sure you understand this is why II offers the same turbo with three different turbines for example. On the compressor side it doesn't change, but a turbine (and EH) changes the way the exhaust (well the amount anyway) flows and for the purposes of the user, how that turbo responds.

Anyway, I'll respectfully hold my position on this one even if I didn't state it correctly... I always reserve the right to be wrong... heck, Nathan Wright's always having to run around and clean up (correct) behind me. It wouldn't be the first time here either.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 10:40 AM
  #20  
ratsun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 1
From: Wet Coast, Canada
Originally Posted by CamperAndy
Reduced O2 from an incomplete exhaust cycle (due to high back pressure) may increase cylinder heat but will reduce peak cylinder pressure due to incomplete burn of the fuel charge.



Correct, if the light stayed static but that heat will light it sooner and increase expansion time raising pressure.



More fuel does not always mean more pressure.

I believe this.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 11:21 AM
  #21  
2007 5.9's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
As far as MAP goes...I know when I am out of the MAP of my turbo...at 45-48psi I see a 1:1 ratio...but at 50psi I see a 1.3:1 ratio. The MAP for the Super B Special is around 45-47psi, I can see it plain as day when I exceed that with boost, my DP starts to rise dramatically.

So I agree with soulezoo...ratio of DP/Boost is determined on the MAP of the turbo.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 02:25 PM
  #22  
no_6_oh_no's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 1
From: McDonough GA
Originally Posted by ratsun
Turbine inlet pressure once over 1-1 ratio will create timing, and yes timing will lift a head gasket.
Each cycle with a excessively high TIP causes a incomplete scavenging of the cyl, next stroke you pour same fuel but less air in (already some left over hot air in there) and this preheats the mix and that cyl now fires sooner. Read timing.
Ah, now I see where your going. Down the wrong road but the direction is clear.

Not gonna happen, mixing combusted exhaust with the incoming charge is a design to reduce cylinder pressures not increase them. Less oxygen in the charge results in less burn, less pressure, and less exhaust flow that lowers DP.

Again, excessive drive pressure CANNOT and WILL NOT increase cylinder pressures. It also CANNOT increase timing. If anything it has the opposite effect.

This scenario cannot happen in a DIRECT INJECTED fuel system. Until you have fuel you have no combustion. Combustion happens when the injection happens. It cannot happen any sooner so there is no ttiming advance by raising charge temps.

Diesel combustion is purely stoichiometric, you only get as much burn as you have oxygen. Once the oxidizer is gone combustuion temps cool and peak pressures drop. The more combusted charge you mix the less the temps and pressures and the less power you get, DP included.

Literally, the more drive pressure you have the LESS likely you are to pop an HG due to the lessed oxygen content in the air charge.

Again, at this point EGT's are much more of an issue the DP ever will be.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 02:30 PM
  #23  
no_6_oh_no's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 1
From: McDonough GA
Originally Posted by 2007 5.9
As far as MAP goes...I know when I am out of the MAP of my turbo...at 45-48psi I see a 1:1 ratio...but at 50psi I see a 1.3:1 ratio. The MAP for the Super B Special is around 45-47psi, I can see it plain as day when I exceed that with boost, my DP starts to rise dramatically.
As I pointed out previously, once you are out of the compressor map the boost to drive pressure will diverge. Doesn't mean the map defines the DP it just means the turbine size and design at its limits there.

Did you mean boost at 1 and DP at 1.3 or opposite? If boost is exceeding DP then you are not neccessarily out of the turbo's compressore map.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #24  
no_6_oh_no's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 1
From: McDonough GA
Originally Posted by soulezoo
Anyway, I'll respectfully hold my position on this one even if I didn't state it correctly... I always reserve the right to be wrong... heck, Nathan Wright's always having to run around and clean up (correct) behind me. It wouldn't be the first time here either.
I was just yanking your chain a bit. I knew where you were going but the original post just did not read right without further explanation.

I don't disagree with your explanantion and questions except on one small point, excessive drive pressure is a sympton not a cause.

Your statement about why some pop at 45 psi and other will hold 50 psi is dead on. I would hazard a guess if circumstances were examined closely fueling and reultant EGT's would be the largest contribution to failures. As to why do stock chargers see more failures is telling also, quality of the air supplied by a single cannot compete with even a small set of twins at the same boost. Less oxygen is gonna drive cylinder temps higher and probbaly reduce pressures but heat has its own dangers also.

The fact that one can stress a HG on VE engine at a lot less psi and drive pressure than a CR tells me there are other factors here that will contribute. Notably cylinder pressures and cylinder temps.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 06:02 PM
  #25  
ratsun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 1
From: Wet Coast, Canada
Originally Posted by no_6_oh_no
Ah, now I see where your going. Down the wrong road but the direction is clear.

Not gonna happen, mixing combusted exhaust with the incoming charge is a design to reduce cylinder pressures not increase them. Less oxygen in the charge results in less burn, less pressure, and less exhaust flow that lowers DP.

Again, excessive drive pressure CANNOT and WILL NOT increase cylinder pressures. It also CANNOT increase timing. If anything it has the opposite effect.

This scenario cannot happen in a DIRECT INJECTED fuel system. Until you have fuel you have no combustion. Combustion happens when the injection happens. It cannot happen any sooner so there is no ttiming advance by raising charge temps.
Been down the wrong road before....that's how I find new places LOL

Are you than saying the ignition doesn't take place at the injector tip and it still does it in the bowl of the piston in an super heated cyl?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 06:45 PM
  #26  
no_6_oh_no's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 1
From: McDonough GA
Originally Posted by ratsun
Been down the wrong road before....that's how I find new places LOL
For sure, the road not taken can lead to some interesting places.


Originally Posted by ratsun
Are you than saying the ignition doesn't take place at the injector tip and it still does it in the bowl of the piston in an super heated cyl?
If it did, how long do you think the injector tips would last?

What do you define as a super heated cylinder?


To understand the questions a little better let me throw some numbers and ideas out there for consideration.

1. Cylinder temps pre-combustion can easily reach 1200-1500 degrees BEFORE injection depending on load and fueling.

2. Max cylinder temps in the center of a combustion event can easily exceed 5000 degrees depending on fuel and air available.

3. What we are reading on EGT gauges is only 1/4 to 1/3 of actual cylinder temps.

4. Combustion events must occur in air without the fuel stream hitting any part of the engine and far enough away from the engine components to not super heat them.

The last one is extremely important to the question about where combustion starts. I guarantee if you put 3000 degrees to a tip it will disintergrate. Having combustion start that close to a tip is gonna cause a big BOOM! I think everyone has seen pictures of torched heads and pistons when spray patterns are not optimal and routed onto engine surfaces.

It doesn't happen that way for a couple of reasons. Diesel fuel needs to mix with ait to combust efficiently. Diesel will combust at the same rate irregardless of the charge temp as that is its nature. Given the fuel is leaving the nozzle at 23k psi and it has to spread a bit to mix with oxygen molecules combustion will be fairly far away from the tip irregardless of charge temp. We have all seen what happens when a cumbustible gas is shot form an orfice under pressure. Combustion does not start at the orfice but rather farther along the stream when enough oxygen has mixed to support ignition. Gas well fires are a good example.

How much preheating will you really get by mixing combusted gases with a cooler denser charge? This is a normal route to reduce cylinder temps and pressures in emissions engines so its really nothing new to an engine designed to run that way.

Since the exhaust gases are oxygen depleted and mixed with the fresh charge isn't more realistic that will retard combustion and limit the burn length rather than the other way around?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 07:41 PM
  #27  
CamperAndy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 1
From: Coeur d'Alene ID
No 6 oh no - Agree with everything but stoichiometric combustion of diesel results in a little bit lower peak temp of 4100 degree F (2550 Kelvin).

Good overall comments on the subject though.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 08:39 PM
  #28  
no_6_oh_no's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 1
From: McDonough GA
Originally Posted by CamperAndy
No 6 oh no - Agree with everything but stoichiometric combustion of diesel results in a little bit lower peak temp of 4100 degree F (2550 Kelvin).
Yep, it will. That plus multiple events and in-cylinder EGR are the solution Cummins uses to control high cylinder temps and pressures for emissions purposes.

However, its pretty clear that pushing into higher drive pressure areas it is gonna be a fuel rich environment not stoichiometric. Hence my comment temps could run to 5000 degrees depending.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 08:55 PM
  #29  
ratsun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 1
From: Wet Coast, Canada
Originally Posted by no_6_oh_no
For sure, the road not taken can lead to some interesting places.




I'm with you on much of the stuff but heres were I go down the other road.


It doesn't happen that way for a couple of reasons. Diesel fuel needs to mix with ait to combust efficiently. Diesel will combust at the same rate irregardless of the charge temp as that is its nature. Given the fuel is leaving the nozzle at 23k psi and it has to spread a bit to mix with oxygen molecules combustion will be fairly far away from the tip irregardless of charge temp. We have all seen what happens when a cumbustible gas is shot form an orfice under pressure. Combustion does not start at the orfice but rather farther along the stream when enough oxygen has mixed to support ignition. Gas well fires are a good example.
The air is already in the cyl so I dont understand the point?
Nothing can combust until heated to a gaseous state there for higher temps will result in sooner combustion. Agreed?
We are not mixing the fuel with the air as much as heating it to a gas with-in a controlled temperature for its ignition. Agreed?
The O2 in a cyl transfers the heat to the fuel there for higher temps will transfer the required heat faster. Agreed
Did I loose you or are still following where I'm going LOL
I may have oversimplified my statement that the TIP will in itself blow a HG.
I believe it is a huge factor in how much heat is left in the cyl.
My personal experiences are limited to just 5 of my own HG failures between the three trucks (P-pump , VP and CR) but there has always been the same common denominator, excessive DP and EGTs. I have never had high EGTs without high DP but I have yet to have a DP gauge hooked up to my CR so....
I have seen a CR go many pulls over 650hp with its DP and EGTs with-in check without spitting a HG yet watched countless stock turbo 12vs chunk a HG at less than 350hp but screaming DP and EGTS
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 09:27 PM
  #30  
no_6_oh_no's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 1
From: McDonough GA
Originally Posted by ratsun
The air is already in the cyl so I dont understand the point?
Nothing can combust until heated to a gaseous state there for higher temps will result in sooner combustion. Agreed?
We are not mixing the fuel with the air as much as heating it to a gas with-in a controlled temperature for its ignition. Agreed?
The O2 in a cyl transfers the heat to the fuel there for higher temps will transfer the required heat faster. Agreed
The air is present but the fuel is in a solid stream on injection. Fuel cannot combust unless an oxidizer is present. If the fuel molecules are too close together there are not enough oxygen molecules to support combustion. There is a time lag as the fuel spray disburses and mixes with oxygen molecules to support continued combustion.

It really doesn't matter how hot the charge is. If there is insufficient oxygen to support combustion it doesn't happen. Diesel fuel does not vaporize like gasoline so you really don't convert it to gas for combustion but force the state change of the fuel and oxygen into something else. Combustion actually starts on the edges and proceeds thru the denser center as a flame front with the center having the highest temps.

Originally Posted by ratsun
My personal experiences are limited to just 5 of my own HG failures between the three trucks (P-pump , VP and CR) but there has always been the same common denominator, excessive DP and EGTs. I have never had high EGTs without high DP but I have yet to have a DP gauge hooked up to my CR so....
I have seen a CR go many pulls over 650hp with its DP and EGTs with-in check without spitting a HG yet watched countless stock turbo 12vs chunk a HG at less than 350hp but screaming DP and EGTS
Not disagreeing with any of this. Just saying DP is more a symptom of other problems, chiefly EGT's, than a direct cause for he HG going. Cylinder pressures and temps are the direct cause, high DP is the result of too small turbine design and quite likely a lot of fuel being exhausted still expanding in the exhaust track.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM.