Super Single Question
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, Pa. & Columbus, OH.
I almost fell off my chair when I looked on Bridgestone's Truck Tire website and saw a 445/50/22.5 tire that is only 40" tall!
It is 17.4" wide (18.5" loaded), and goes on a 14" wide rim. I would save probably 200 lbs. in wheel and tire weight between the left and right side. Obviously I would change the front tire to something like a 295/75/22.5 to keep the overall size within 1/2".
My question is, do you think the weight savings would be worth it in the long run? This tire, according to the site, can handle more weight, has the same tread depth, and can go 10 MPH faster (from 65 to 75).
What do you guys think?
It is 17.4" wide (18.5" loaded), and goes on a 14" wide rim. I would save probably 200 lbs. in wheel and tire weight between the left and right side. Obviously I would change the front tire to something like a 295/75/22.5 to keep the overall size within 1/2".
My question is, do you think the weight savings would be worth it in the long run? This tire, according to the site, can handle more weight, has the same tread depth, and can go 10 MPH faster (from 65 to 75).
What do you guys think?
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, Pa. & Columbus, OH.
And yes, 75mph. That is better than the 65 mine are rated for. Don't forget, they are talking about being on an 80,000LB. Semi @ 75MPH. A little different then our little 1 tons, LOL!
seen a gen 1 ram that was lifted and on a 22.5 super single.... it definitly stands out seeing 2 super wide single tires compared to the 4 tires that are normally seen
the only downside would be if you ever got a flat or a blowout.. no 2nd tire to support the truck while you pulled over
the only downside would be if you ever got a flat or a blowout.. no 2nd tire to support the truck while you pulled over
Don't worry about the slight difference in inflated loaded diameter - I sometimes run for many thousands of miles w/o rotating tires, and can easily get up to 1" difference in tire diameter.
Besides, 4WD is for slippery conditions, when the front & rear will be able to turn at different tread speeds.
Besides, 4WD is for slippery conditions, when the front & rear will be able to turn at different tread speeds.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, Pa. & Columbus, OH.
Don't worry about the slight difference in inflated loaded diameter - I sometimes run for many thousands of miles w/o rotating tires, and can easily get up to 1" difference in tire diameter.
Besides, 4WD is for slippery conditions, when the front & rear will be able to turn at different tread speeds.
Besides, 4WD is for slippery conditions, when the front & rear will be able to turn at different tread speeds.
The speed rating is for tire temperature and balance. The faster you spin the tire the more balanced the tire must be....Sounds like a win win situation. If you get a flat with those tires you'd have to stop to check on the econocar you just ran over anyway
ks
ks
I doubt you'll have any clearance problems in the rear at all; I recently measured my truck for 37s all around and there was lots of room in the rear.
I have no lift at all and it'd be easier to get 40" in the rear than 37" in the front.
With the 3" rear lift you're planning, they'll fit fine... have you checked the backspacing yet? I like to see the inboard of the tire within 1" of the frame/suspension for the "tucked under" look.
I have no lift at all and it'd be easier to get 40" in the rear than 37" in the front.
With the 3" rear lift you're planning, they'll fit fine... have you checked the backspacing yet? I like to see the inboard of the tire within 1" of the frame/suspension for the "tucked under" look.


