3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only) Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for third generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories. THIS IS FOR THE 5.9L ONLY!

GDP Intake Horn Tested!

Old Jan 30, 2008 | 03:06 PM
  #16  
Luvnacumns's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,194
Likes: 0
From: Twin Falls, Idaho
Yep I had this item on my "to order" list!!!!
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 03:09 PM
  #17  
realsquash's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
From: Southeast WI
Originally Posted by Erik@TVP
Easy, the dip was pretty much over by 2000rpm, you can draw a line to approximate the power curve without the dip. Even discounting the dip, the power gains elsewhere were consistent. Boost when the run started was the same for both runs and they finished approximately the same also (44ish psi)
I have to cry foul here! If the graph were trended out to cover the slip off the throttle you might see a increase of 20 lb-ft max, not 136 lb-ft like you posted.

I suggest you change your numbers or pull it down and retest.

Andy
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 03:16 PM
  #18  
Erik@LCD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 414
Likes: 2
I added another graph on the website of a run I chose not to use. Note the dip isnt there. I didnt use this one because it showed an unrealistic gain. Turns out the boost pressure was lower when the run started so it didnt peak like it did in the run we chose for running the final numbers. I chose the two "closest" runs.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 03:19 PM
  #19  
Erik@LCD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 414
Likes: 2
if that still doesnt work for you, put your hand over the graph below 2000. Still works from there on.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 03:28 PM
  #20  
silkywoods's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Would your gains be cut in half of you replace the manifold (with a GDP) and don't replace the heater grid with a grid delete??
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 03:37 PM
  #21  
Erik@LCD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 414
Likes: 2
no, I doubt it, the grid delete is only good for a few, the manifolds are making the largest difference.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 03:40 PM
  #22  
jlibert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, Ca
Originally Posted by realsquash
I have to cry foul here! If the graph were trended out to cover the slip off the throttle you might see a increase of 20 lb-ft max, not 136 lb-ft like you posted.

I suggest you change your numbers or pull it down and retest.

Andy
I have an idea! Realsquash, go buy all of the manifolds tested, rent a dyno for a couple of hours, and tell us how they perform on your truck.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 04:15 PM
  #23  
realsquash's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
From: Southeast WI
Originally Posted by jlibert
I have an idea! Realsquash, go buy all of the manifolds tested, rent a dyno for a couple of hours, and tell us how they perform on your truck.
Hopefully my foot doesn't slip off the throttle and into my mouth.

Andy
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 04:21 PM
  #24  
omaharam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 1
From: Nebraska
Well it looks to me also if you make that line smooth without the dip that it would be about 30hp at 2000rpms.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 04:27 PM
  #25  
jlibert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, Ca
Realsquash-I think it just did.


But really-

Neither I nor Erik are trying to hype up the manifold. It made a little peak power, a decent improvement in midrange power, and it looks good. period. I paid full price for the manifold from Rich, and was going to post results even if it lost power on the dyno. The graphs were presented with an explanation as to any abnormalities, and compared to stock, same truck, same day, etc. I wish I could have had a dyno graph for every part I've ever purchased for my truck! Keep in mind that there are so many variables to consider when dynoing a vehicle, that the results have to be taken for what they are. You can interpret the graph however you want, and um sorry you aren't happy with the testing methods or interpretations.

J.P.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 04:39 PM
  #26  
jmccart's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Does the CFM or GDP come with the 2 new gaskets for the heater delete?

Thanx.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 04:40 PM
  #27  
jlibert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, Ca
Originally Posted by jmccart
Does the CFM or GDP come with the 2 new gaskets for the heater delete?

Thanx.
mine came with 2 gaskets.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 04:42 PM
  #28  
realsquash's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
From: Southeast WI
If the manifold really smoothed out that dip under 2000 rpm, that is truly a great thing, but what I'm reading here casts doubt on that. I've seen that dip in many a chart, but now I read that someone's foot slipped off the throttle during a run, and then that there were 3 runs, one that shows even more confusing results. Of course the run where the foot slipped also shows the best gains, and it would seem to me that the dyno operator would make another run if his foot slipped off. Something doesn't add up!

Andy
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 04:43 PM
  #29  
BRT's Avatar
BRT
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Santa Teresa, New Mexico
Those ones winspeed has looks cool.
The rubber coated metal.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 04:45 PM
  #30  
Erik@LCD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 414
Likes: 2
If we cut irregularities, the manifold averaged 20-25HP and 45-65tq from 1800-2300. They are pretty close from 2300-3000, then the gains are 13-20hp and 25-32tq.

Last edited by Erik@LCD; Jan 30, 2008 at 05:01 PM. Reason: mis type
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 PM.