GDP Intake Horn Tested!
Easy, the dip was pretty much over by 2000rpm, you can draw a line to approximate the power curve without the dip. Even discounting the dip, the power gains elsewhere were consistent. Boost when the run started was the same for both runs and they finished approximately the same also (44ish psi)
I suggest you change your numbers or pull it down and retest.
Andy
I added another graph on the website of a run I chose not to use. Note the dip isnt there. I didnt use this one because it showed an unrealistic gain. Turns out the boost pressure was lower when the run started so it didnt peak like it did in the run we chose for running the final numbers. I chose the two "closest" runs.
Realsquash-I think it just did.
But really-
Neither I nor Erik are trying to hype up the manifold. It made a little peak power, a decent improvement in midrange power, and it looks good. period. I paid full price for the manifold from Rich, and was going to post results even if it lost power on the dyno. The graphs were presented with an explanation as to any abnormalities, and compared to stock, same truck, same day, etc. I wish I could have had a dyno graph for every part I've ever purchased for my truck! Keep in mind that there are so many variables to consider when dynoing a vehicle, that the results have to be taken for what they are. You can interpret the graph however you want, and um sorry you aren't happy with the testing methods or interpretations.
J.P.
But really-
Neither I nor Erik are trying to hype up the manifold. It made a little peak power, a decent improvement in midrange power, and it looks good. period. I paid full price for the manifold from Rich, and was going to post results even if it lost power on the dyno. The graphs were presented with an explanation as to any abnormalities, and compared to stock, same truck, same day, etc. I wish I could have had a dyno graph for every part I've ever purchased for my truck! Keep in mind that there are so many variables to consider when dynoing a vehicle, that the results have to be taken for what they are. You can interpret the graph however you want, and um sorry you aren't happy with the testing methods or interpretations.
J.P.
If the manifold really smoothed out that dip under 2000 rpm, that is truly a great thing, but what I'm reading here casts doubt on that. I've seen that dip in many a chart, but now I read that someone's foot slipped off the throttle during a run, and then that there were 3 runs, one that shows even more confusing results. Of course the run where the foot slipped also shows the best gains, and it would seem to me that the dyno operator would make another run if his foot slipped off. Something doesn't add up!
Andy
Andy
If we cut irregularities, the manifold averaged 20-25HP and 45-65tq from 1800-2300. They are pretty close from 2300-3000, then the gains are 13-20hp and 25-32tq.
Last edited by Erik@LCD; Jan 30, 2008 at 05:01 PM. Reason: mis type



